Hi, On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:37:36AM +0000, André Przywara wrote: > On 03/03/17 14:32, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > If we depend on the ARCH_SUNXI configuration option, the boards that do not > > have NAND support enabled (with the associated options) will not compile > > anymore. > > > > Depend on the NAND driver configuration option to make sure that is not the > > case. > > > > Reported-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <w...@csie.org> > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com> > > As I came up with an identical patch today to fix sunxi/master: > > Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@arm.com> > > > So this situation is a bit unfortunate: The sunxi/master branch was > updated apparently before even compile-testing it for more than one > sunxi board (it is broken for every sunxi board except Chip Pro at the > moment: buildman says 105/106). And even after reports and the > corresponding fixes appeared (thanks Chen-Yu and Maxime!) the branch is > _still_ broken as of today (10 days after the fix was posted). > > So can we please have both > a) a better quality assurance before merging patches into this custodian > branch and > b) quicker merging of fixes? > To my understanding u-boot-sunxi should be always a good and working > candidate for anyone interested in Allwinner boards. > > For a) it would already help to just simply build test sunxi: > $ tools/buildman/buildman sunxi > but probably extend this to cover at least all ARM boards.
Jagan usually takes the patches, but he seems to be off, and I was in holidays last week. I just pushed it, sorry for the breakage. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
