Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] at91: fixed 'esd gmbh' meesc and otc570 boards

2011-01-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Daniel Gorsulowski, In message <4d399177.4040...@esd.eu> you wrote: > > > Maybe there is a suitable SIZE_128MIB (didn't check) - would look more > > readable ;) > > AFAIK, Wolfgang wants to get rid of the sizes.h file. So I'll replace Correct. > that with something like (128*1024*1024) F

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] at91: fixed 'esd gmbh' meesc and otc570 boards

2011-01-21 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Reinhard Meyer wrote: > Dear Daniel Gorsulowski, >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski >> ... >> -gd->bd->bi_dram[0].start = PHYS_SDRAM; >> -gd->bd->bi_dram[0].size = get_ram_size((long *) PHYS_SDRAM, (1<< 27)); >> +gd->bd->bi_dram[0].start = CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_BASE; >> +gd->bd->bi_dr

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] at91: fixed 'esd gmbh' meesc and otc570 boards

2011-01-21 Thread Reinhard Meyer
Dear Daniel Gorsulowski, > Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski > --- > > There is still a bug in USART config. This patch is for reviewing only! I am really at a loss how that can be, since you correctly pass the DBGU address to the driver. > > board/esd/meesc/config.mk |1 - > board/esd/me

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] at91: fixed 'esd gmbh' meesc and otc570 boards

2011-01-21 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- There is still a bug in USART config. This patch is for reviewing only! board/esd/meesc/config.mk |1 - board/esd/meesc/meesc.c| 39 +- board/esd/otc570/config.mk |1 - board/esd/otc570/otc570.c | 51 +++-- boards.cfg