On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 02:44:24PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 04/26/2016 12:15 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:18:06AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >>On 04/25/2016 05:22 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >>...
> >>>I know company lawyers come up with various policies and some are mor
On 04/26/2016 12:15 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:18:06AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 04/25/2016 05:22 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
...
I know company lawyers come up with various policies and some are more
restrictive than others. Anything about the exact guidelines you can
share
In message <20160426181301.92f78100...@atlas.denx.de> I wrote:
> Dear Stephen,
>
> In message <571f94be.2030...@wwwdotorg.org> you wrote:
> >
> > Guidance on "non-trivial" isn't given. I would take it to mean anything
> > other than typos and whitespace fixes.
>
> recommended search term: Copyri
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:18:06AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 04/25/2016 05:22 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> ...
> >I know company lawyers come up with various policies and some are more
> >restrictive than others. Anything about the exact guidelines you can
> >share would be appreciated.
>
> They
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:23:36AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 04/25/2016 05:22 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> >Lawyers can argue, but projects have guidelines. I mean heck, I've see
> >you remind people to fix the include order in new patches. Do they need
> >to add an NVIDIA copyright notice to
Dear Stephen,
In message <571f94be.2030...@wwwdotorg.org> you wrote:
>
> Guidance on "non-trivial" isn't given. I would take it to mean anything
> other than typos and whitespace fixes.
recommended search term: Copyright Creativity Requirement
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Eng
On 04/25/2016 05:22 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
Lawyers can argue, but projects have guidelines. I mean heck, I've see
you remind people to fix the include order in new patches. Do they need
to add an NVIDIA copyright notice too? No, of course not.
Well honestly all patch review does contribute to
On 04/25/2016 05:22 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
...
I know company lawyers come up with various policies and some are more
restrictive than others. Anything about the exact guidelines you can
share would be appreciated.
They're simple and I would assume quite standard:
1) When creating a new file, ad
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:59:39PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Stephen,
>
> In message <571e75e2.6020...@wwwdotorg.org> you wrote:
> >
> > >> /*
> > >>* (C) Copyright 2013
> > >>* Avionic Design GmbH
> > >> + * Copyright (c) 2016, NVIDIA CORPORATION. All rights reserved.
> > >>
Dear Stephen,
In message <571e75e2.6020...@wwwdotorg.org> you wrote:
>
> >> /*
> >>* (C) Copyright 2013
> >>* Avionic Design GmbH
> >> + * Copyright (c) 2016, NVIDIA CORPORATION. All rights reserved.
> >>*
> >>* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> >>*/
> >>
> >> #incl
On 04/24/2016 04:20 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Stephen,
In message <1461099580-3866-14-git-send-email-swar...@wwwdotorg.org> you wrote:
--- a/board/avionic-design/common/tamonten-ng.c
+++ b/board/avionic-design/common/tamonten-ng.c
@@ -1,18 +1,19 @@
/*
* (C) Copyright 2013
* Avionic
Dear Stephen,
In message <1461099580-3866-14-git-send-email-swar...@wwwdotorg.org> you wrote:
>
> --- a/board/avionic-design/common/tamonten-ng.c
> +++ b/board/avionic-design/common/tamonten-ng.c
> @@ -1,18 +1,19 @@
> /*
> * (C) Copyright 2013
> * Avionic Design GmbH
> + * Copyright (c) 201
On 19 April 2016 at 14:58, Stephen Warren wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren
>
> The order is general includes, general asm includes, arch asm includes,
> local files.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren
> ---
> board/avionic-design/common/tamonten-ng.c | 5 +++--
> board/nvidia/cardhu/cardhu.c
From: Stephen Warren
The order is general includes, general asm includes, arch asm includes,
local files.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren
---
board/avionic-design/common/tamonten-ng.c | 5 +++--
board/nvidia/cardhu/cardhu.c | 6 +++---
board/nvidia/jetson-tk1/jetson-tk1.c | 4 +
14 matches
Mail list logo
