On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:23:36AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 04/25/2016 05:22 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > >Lawyers can argue, but projects have guidelines. I mean heck, I've see > >you remind people to fix the include order in new patches. Do they need > >to add an NVIDIA copyright notice too? No, of course not. > > Well honestly all patch review does contribute to the creative > process and affect the final result, so I don't actually think it'd > be that much of a stretch that a reviewer's copyright applies to the > final patch; they were involved in the creation of it. Perhaps > Reviewed-by tags or the mailing list history would be enough > evidence of this though, if such were needed later.
And this is why I love patchwork and hope that as it starts to handle series more directly it will also handle "For the series, ..." messages in addition to collecting up Acked/Reviewed/Tested by lines. These are important for history of changes to the codebase. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
