Hi Tom,
On 10 February 2015 at 15:07, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 09:48:32AM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>> Hello Tom,
>>
>> On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 13:56:57 -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
>>
>> > And (and this is being split into
>> > different email threads, sigh), it would be good, possibly
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 09:48:32AM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hello Tom,
>
> On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 13:56:57 -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > And (and this is being split into
> > different email threads, sigh), it would be good, possibly, if we have
> > something that means "very early init things,
Hi Albert,
On 5 February 2015 at 11:02, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hello Simon,
>
> On Thu, 5 Feb 2015 08:34:53 -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Albert,
>
>> >> reset - no stack, no RAM ( (except SPL can presumably access data section)
>> >
>> > More precisely: from a hardware viewpoint there would
Hello Simon,
On Thu, 5 Feb 2015 08:34:53 -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Albert,
> >> reset - no stack, no RAM ( (except SPL can presumably access data section)
> >
> > More precisely: from a hardware viewpoint there would be no DDR, but
> > there could be SRAM, and from a program viewpoint, no s
Hi Albert,
On 5 February 2015 at 08:14, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hello Simon,
>
> On Wed, 4 Feb 2015 20:00:48 -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Albert,
>>
>> On 4 February 2015 at 01:48, Albert ARIBAUD
>> wrote:
>> > Hello Tom,
>> >
>> > On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 13:56:57 -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
>> >
>>
Hello Simon,
On Wed, 4 Feb 2015 20:00:48 -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Albert,
>
> On 4 February 2015 at 01:48, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > Hello Tom,
> >
> > On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 13:56:57 -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> >> And (and this is being split into
> >> different email threads, sigh), it wo
Hi,
On 05-02-15 04:00, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Albert,
On 4 February 2015 at 01:48, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hello Tom,
On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 13:56:57 -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
And (and this is being split into
different email threads, sigh), it would be good, possibly, if we have
something that mea
Hi Albert,
On 4 February 2015 at 01:48, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hello Tom,
>
> On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 13:56:57 -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
>
>> And (and this is being split into
>> different email threads, sigh), it would be good, possibly, if we have
>> something that means "very early init things, but
Hello Tom,
On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 13:56:57 -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> And (and this is being split into
> different email threads, sigh), it would be good, possibly, if we have
> something that means "very early init things, but we can be written in
> C".
"Very early" -- and "early" too, BTW -- is wa
+Bin
Hi Tom,
On 2 February 2015 at 11:56, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 03:14:35PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On 31 January 2015 at 14:49, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 10:25:50PM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > > > Hello Tom,
> > > >
> >
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 03:14:35PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On 31 January 2015 at 14:49, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 10:25:50PM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > > Hello Tom,
> > >
> > > On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 09:23:47 -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 26,
Hi Tom,
On 31 January 2015 at 14:49, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 10:25:50PM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > Hello Tom,
> >
> > On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 09:23:47 -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 08:32:41PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 10:25:50PM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hello Tom,
>
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 09:23:47 -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 08:32:41PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 26-01-15 16:18, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > >On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 09:54:12
Hello Tom,
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 09:23:47 -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 08:32:41PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 26-01-15 16:18, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 09:54:12AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > >>Hi,
> > >>
> > >>On 22-01-15 22:03, Tom Rin
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 08:32:41PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 26-01-15 16:18, Tom Rini wrote:
> >On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 09:54:12AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>On 22-01-15 22:03, Tom Rini wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 08:10:06PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>
Hi,
On 26-01-15 16:18, Tom Rini wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 09:54:12AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 22-01-15 22:03, Tom Rini wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 08:10:06PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 22-01-15 17:20, Tom Rini wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 09:03:25PM +0100, Hans
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 09:54:12AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 22-01-15 22:03, Tom Rini wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 08:10:06PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>On 22-01-15 17:20, Tom Rini wrote:
> >>>On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 09:03:25PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>
Hi,
On 26-01-15 09:09, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hello Tom,
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:20:58 -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 09:03:25PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
On some SoCs / ARMv7 CPU cores we need to do some setup before enabling the
icache, etc. Add a soc_init hook with a weak
Hello Tom,
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:20:58 -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 09:03:25PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> > On some SoCs / ARMv7 CPU cores we need to do some setup before enabling the
> > icache, etc. Add a soc_init hook with a weak default which just calls
> > cpu_init
Hi,
On 22-01-15 22:03, Tom Rini wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 08:10:06PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 22-01-15 17:20, Tom Rini wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 09:03:25PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
On some SoCs / ARMv7 CPU cores we need to do some setup before enabling the
icache, etc
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 08:10:06PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 22-01-15 17:20, Tom Rini wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 09:03:25PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >
> >>On some SoCs / ARMv7 CPU cores we need to do some setup before enabling the
> >>icache, etc. Add a soc_init hook wit
Hi,
On 22-01-15 17:20, Tom Rini wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 09:03:25PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
On some SoCs / ARMv7 CPU cores we need to do some setup before enabling the
icache, etc. Add a soc_init hook with a weak default which just calls
cpu_init_cp15.
This way different implementat
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 09:03:25PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On some SoCs / ARMv7 CPU cores we need to do some setup before enabling the
> icache, etc. Add a soc_init hook with a weak default which just calls
> cpu_init_cp15.
>
> This way different implementations can be provided to do some e
>> On 21 Jan 2015, hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
>>
>>> On some SoCs / ARMv7 CPU cores we need to do some setup before
>>> enabling the icache, etc. Add a soc_init hook with a weak default
>>> which just calls cpu_init_cp15.
>>>
>>> This way different implementations can be provided to do some extra
Hi,
On 21-01-15 22:59, Bill Pringlemeir wrote:
On 21 Jan 2015, hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
On some SoCs / ARMv7 CPU cores we need to do some setup before
enabling the icache, etc. Add a soc_init hook with a weak default
which just calls cpu_init_cp15.
This way different implementations can be
On 21 Jan 2015, hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
> On some SoCs / ARMv7 CPU cores we need to do some setup before
> enabling the icache, etc. Add a soc_init hook with a weak default
> which just calls cpu_init_cp15.
>
> This way different implementations can be provided to do some extra
> work before or
On some SoCs / ARMv7 CPU cores we need to do some setup before enabling the
icache, etc. Add a soc_init hook with a weak default which just calls
cpu_init_cp15.
This way different implementations can be provided to do some extra work
before or after cpu_init_cp15, or completely replacing cpu_init_
27 matches
Mail list logo