On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 03:21:15PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Tom,
>
> In message <20170815113952.GE20467@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
> >
> > What CONFIG_STANDALONE_LOAD_ADDR is, is the location that we want
> > hello_world, or other example stand alone applications loaded into
> > memory at
Dear Max,
In message <1502799746.3076.16.ca...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> Wolfgang says that a board needs to decide on what image type to
> use for the standalone application and then from that set an
No, I did not say this. On contrary, this is not up to the "board"
to decide. This is a decis
Dear Tom,
In message <20170815113952.GE20467@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>
> What CONFIG_STANDALONE_LOAD_ADDR is, is the location that we want
> hello_world, or other example stand alone applications loaded into
> memory at. CONFIG_LOADADDR is the safe default location to load things
> into memory
Hello all
Am Dienstag, den 15.08.2017, 07:39 -0400 schrieb Tom Rini:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 09:32:30AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> >
> > Dear Tom,
> >
> > In message <20170814211300.GM20467@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > But we're talking about CONFIG_STANDALONE_LOAD_ADDR not
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 09:32:30AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Tom,
>
> In message <20170814211300.GM20467@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
> >
> > But we're talking about CONFIG_STANDALONE_LOAD_ADDR not
> > CONFIG_STANDALONE_ENTRY_POINT. What we've been doing in
> > arch/arm/config.mk has been o
Dear Tom,
In message <20170814211300.GM20467@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>
> But we're talking about CONFIG_STANDALONE_LOAD_ADDR not
> CONFIG_STANDALONE_ENTRY_POINT. What we've been doing in
> arch/arm/config.mk has been on my to fix list for a long time, because
> it's been wrong for so many board
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 09:36:35PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Max,
>
> In message <1502572898.17070.11.ca...@gmail.com> you wrote:
> >
> > Ok, will do. The issue is that linking the standalone application
> > to have its text segment at a hardcoded address is less
> > likely to work than
Dear Max,
In message <1502572898.17070.11.ca...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> Ok, will do. The issue is that linking the standalone application
> to have its text segment at a hardcoded address is less
> likely to work than using an address provided by the board
This may (or may not) be the case - b
Dear Wolfgang
Am Samstag, den 12.08.2017, 20:29 +0200 schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
> Dear Max,
>
> In message <20170812090346.7887-2-max.krummenac...@toradex.com> you wrote:
> >
> > Different SoCs have different RAM layouts, so providing
> > $(CONFIG_LOADADDR) instead of the constant 0xc10 for
> >
Dear Max,
In message <20170812090346.7887-2-max.krummenac...@toradex.com> you wrote:
> Different SoCs have different RAM layouts, so providing
> $(CONFIG_LOADADDR) instead of the constant 0xc10 for
> CONFIG_STANDALONE_LOAD_ADDR is probably more appropriate.
At least the wording of the Subject
Different SoCs have different RAM layouts, so providing
$(CONFIG_LOADADDR) instead of the constant 0xc10 for
CONFIG_STANDALONE_LOAD_ADDR is probably more appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Max Krummenacher
---
arch/arm/config.mk| 4
doc/README.standalone | 2 +-
2 files changed, 5 inserti
11 matches
Mail list logo
