On 03/18/2018 03:41 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 03/18/2018 01:27 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 03/18/2018 01:25 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>> Assigning a value to ret if it is immediately overwritten does not make
>>> sense.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt
>>
>> Did you even
On 03/18/2018 03:41 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 03/18/2018 01:27 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 03/18/2018 01:25 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>> Assigning a value to ret if it is immediately overwritten does not make
>>> sense.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt
>>
>> Did you even
On 03/18/2018 01:27 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 03/18/2018 01:25 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>> Assigning a value to ret if it is immediately overwritten does not make
>> sense.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt
>
> Did you even compile-test this ? I have a feeling this file is not used
On 03/18/2018 01:25 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> Assigning a value to ret if it is immediately overwritten does not make
> sense.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt
Did you even compile-test this ? I have a feeling this file is not used
at all, so maybe we should remove this driver.
> -
Assigning a value to ret if it is immediately overwritten does not make
sense.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt
---
drivers/usb/host/ehci-faraday.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-faraday.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-faraday.c
index 821222
5 matches
Mail list logo