Hi Stephen,
On 16 February 2016 at 16:43, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 02/14/2016 07:16 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> Recent additions of the MMC and DISK uclasses have indicated that it is
>> time
>> to look at adding a uclass for block devices. This series does this and
>> includes a few clean-ups
Hi Tom,
On 15 February 2016 at 15:37, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 07:16:29PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>
>> Recent additions of the MMC and DISK uclasses have indicated that it is time
>> to look at adding a uclass for block devices. This series does this and
>> includes a few clean
On 02/14/2016 07:16 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Recent additions of the MMC and DISK uclasses have indicated that it is time
to look at adding a uclass for block devices. This series does this and
includes a few clean-ups to the partition code also.
A block device is typically a child device of its s
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 07:16:29PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Recent additions of the MMC and DISK uclasses have indicated that it is time
> to look at adding a uclass for block devices. This series does this and
> includes a few clean-ups to the partition code also.
>
> A block device is typica
Recent additions of the MMC and DISK uclasses have indicated that it is time
to look at adding a uclass for block devices. This series does this and
includes a few clean-ups to the partition code also.
A block device is typically a child device of its storage parent. For
example an MMC device will
5 matches
Mail list logo
