Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] v2 Linuxstamp II 9260 support

2009-11-05 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Paul Thomas, In message you wrote: > > > I have looked at about half of them. > > It looks like partition tables are identical. Right, and such duplication should be avoided. > > I am interested in a way to generalize this file > > and move it to the cpu layer so all the common > > or nea

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] v2 Linuxstamp II 9260 support

2009-11-04 Thread Tom
Paul Thomas wrote: >> Another partition.c... >> Looking for >> >> ugrep Ulf >> ./board/ronetix/pm9263/partition.c >> * Ulf Samuelsson >> ./board/ronetix/pm9261/partition.c >> * Ulf Samuelsson >> ./board/atmel/at91sam9261ek/partition.c >> * Ulf Samuelsson >> ./board/atmel/at91sam9260ek/partiti

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] v2 Linuxstamp II 9260 support

2009-11-04 Thread Paul Thomas
> > Another partition.c... > Looking for > > ugrep Ulf > ./board/ronetix/pm9263/partition.c >  * Ulf Samuelsson > ./board/ronetix/pm9261/partition.c >  * Ulf Samuelsson > ./board/atmel/at91sam9261ek/partition.c >  * Ulf Samuelsson > ./board/atmel/at91sam9260ek/partition.c >  * Ulf Samuelsson >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] v2 Linuxstamp II 9260 support

2009-11-04 Thread Tom
Paul Thomas wrote: > This adds CONFIG_AT91_ALT_EPINS to avoid using board configs in > at91sam9260_devices.c. > In adding this config at91sam9260ek.h afeb9260.h were changed, this should > probabbly be tested for those 2 boards. You are missing your signoff line. You can do this by doing a 'git

[U-Boot] [PATCH] v2 Linuxstamp II 9260 support

2009-11-03 Thread Paul Thomas
This adds CONFIG_AT91_ALT_EPINS to avoid using board configs in at91sam9260_devices.c. In adding this config at91sam9260ek.h afeb9260.h were changed, this should probabbly be tested for those 2 boards. --- MAINTAINERS |4 + MAKEALL