Paul Thomas wrote: >> Another partition.c... >> Looking for >> >> ugrep Ulf >> ./board/ronetix/pm9263/partition.c >> * Ulf Samuelsson <u...@atmel.com> >> ./board/ronetix/pm9261/partition.c >> * Ulf Samuelsson <u...@atmel.com> >> ./board/atmel/at91sam9261ek/partition.c >> * Ulf Samuelsson <u...@atmel.com> >> ./board/atmel/at91sam9260ek/partition.c >> * Ulf Samuelsson <u...@atmel.com> >> ./board/atmel/at91sam9263ek/partition.c >> * Ulf Samuelsson <u...@atmel.com> >> ./board/atmel/at91sam9rlek/partition.c >> * Ulf Samuelsson <u...@atmel.com> >> ./board/atmel/at91cap9adk/partition.c >> * Ulf Samuelsson <u...@atmel.com> >> ./board/atmel/at91rm9200dk/partition.c >> * Ulf Samuelsson <u...@atmel.com> >> ./board/atmel/at91rm9200ek/led.c >> * Ulf Samuelsson <u...@atmel.com> >> ./board/esd/meesc/partition.c >> * Ulf Samuelsson <u...@atmel.com> >> ./include/configs/at91rm9200ek.h >> * Ulf Samuelsson <u...@atmel.com> >> >> Why do we need another copy? >> Please move this to arm926ejs/at91/ >> If you are feeling adventurous, move the others, else I will take >> care of it once this change is committed >> > > I think the partition.c file should stay with the board and not move > to arm926ejs/at91/. It's probably the case that most of the boards are > using the 8MB dataflash with the same partition table, but it is still > a board specific configuration. >
I have looked at about half of them. It looks like partition tables are identical. The difference is more entries in the CS table. I am interested in a way to generalize this file and move it to the cpu layer so all the common or nearly common files can be reduced to 1 file Tom > thanks, > Paul _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
