On Wednesday 24 September 2008, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> > BTW: I fail to see what's really PPC specific about the pci code in
> > question. Nobuhiro, could you please elaborate what's the problem here?
>
> I wanted to remove CPU and baords of specific code from from PCI network
> driver. CONFIG_
Hi, all.
2008/9/23 Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Monday 22 September 2008, Andrew Dyer wrote:
>> >> I did a simple check.
>> >>
>> >> Only powerpc and i386 and sh seem to use PCI.
>> >> If powerpc does not have a problem, would you commit it?
>> >
>> > Do I have your "go" (or at least no
On Tuesday 23 September 2008, Andy Fleming wrote:
> >>> I did a simple check.
> >>>
> >>> Only powerpc and i386 and sh seem to use PCI.
> >>> If powerpc does not have a problem, would you commit it?
> >>
> >> Do I have your "go" (or at least no veto) to apply this patch?
>
> If some of that code is
On Monday 22 September 2008, Andrew Dyer wrote:
> >> I did a simple check.
> >>
> >> Only powerpc and i386 and sh seem to use PCI.
> >> If powerpc does not have a problem, would you commit it?
> >
> > Do I have your "go" (or at least no veto) to apply this patch?
>
> (forgot to reply all on this, a
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Andrew Dyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Dear Stefan, Kim, Andy, Jon & Kumar,
>>
>> in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
>>>
>>> I did a simple check.
>>>
>>> Only pow
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Stefan, Kim, Andy, Jon & Kumar,
>
> in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
>>
>> I did a simple check.
>>
>> Only powerpc and i386 and sh seem to use PCI.
>> If powerpc does not have a problem, would
Dear Stefan, Kim, Andy, Jon & Kumar,
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
>
> I did a simple check.
>
> Only powerpc and i386 and sh seem to use PCI.
> If powerpc does not have a problem, would you commit it?
Do I have your "go" (or at least no veto) to apply this patch?
Bes
Dear Wolfgang,
I'm doing some work on i386 at the moment and:
a) It seems PCI is already broken - see [PATCH 0/2] Update i386 code
(sc520_cdp) (http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2008-September/040099.html)
b) The board I'm porting to doesn't use PCI
c) I don't have a sc520 board with PCI to te
Hi, Wolfgang .
I did a simple check.
Only powerpc and i386 and sh seem to use PCI.
If powerpc does not have a problem, would you commit it?
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
2008/9/7 Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Dear Nobuhiro Iwamatsu,
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> A source cod
Dear Nobuhiro Iwamatsu,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> A source code of pci is written mainly on powerpc.
> Macro uses a pci source code of powerpc because other architecture
> (ex. SuperH) doesn't work.
>
> I made asm-ppc/pci.h and moved macro of pci.
> Other archtecture need to mak
A source code of pci is written mainly on powerpc.
Macro uses a pci source code of powerpc because other architecture
(ex. SuperH) doesn't work.
I made asm-ppc/pci.h and moved macro of pci.
Other archtecture need to make the following macro in asm-xxx/pci.h
#define pci_phys_to_mem(dev, addr) (ad
11 matches
Mail list logo
