Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] openrd: Once again shrink binary size

2018-08-02 Thread Chris Packham
On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, 11:18 PM Tom Rini, wrote: > On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 08:40:18PM +1200, Chris Packham wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 11:59 PM Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > With some recent changes to relevant drivers here the openrd board > > > (openrd_client in this case) does not fit wit

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] openrd: Once again shrink binary size

2018-08-01 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 08:40:18PM +1200, Chris Packham wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 11:59 PM Tom Rini wrote: > > > > With some recent changes to relevant drivers here the openrd board > > (openrd_client in this case) does not fit within its size constraint. > > We can however drop the slight

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] openrd: Once again shrink binary size

2018-08-01 Thread Chris Packham
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 11:59 PM Tom Rini wrote: > > With some recent changes to relevant drivers here the openrd board > (openrd_client in this case) does not fit within its size constraint. > We can however drop the slightly extended baudrate table and then the > duplication of mtdparts/mtdids i

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] openrd: Once again shrink binary size

2018-07-27 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 07:59:31AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > With some recent changes to relevant drivers here the openrd board > (openrd_client in this case) does not fit within its size constraint. > We can however drop the slightly extended baudrate table and then the > duplication of mtdparts/m

[U-Boot] [PATCH] openrd: Once again shrink binary size

2018-07-27 Thread Tom Rini
With some recent changes to relevant drivers here the openrd board (openrd_client in this case) does not fit within its size constraint. We can however drop the slightly extended baudrate table and then the duplication of mtdparts/mtdids in the default environment. These defaults are set in the en