On 07/15/2013 08:33 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi Eric,
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Eric Nelson
wrote:
Thanks for pointing it out. I had missed this.
rename board/{freescale/mx6qsabrelite/README =>
boundary/nitrogen6x/README.mx6qsabrelite} (100%)
I also have to admit not having read
Hi Eric,
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Eric Nelson
wrote:
> Thanks for pointing it out. I had missed this.
>
>
>> rename board/{freescale/mx6qsabrelite/README =>
>> boundary/nitrogen6x/README.mx6qsabrelite} (100%)
>
>
> I also have to admit not having read this README.
>
> It appears to give
Hi Fabio,
On 07/14/2013 09:23 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi Eric,
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Eric Nelson
wrote:
Agreed :-)
Reviewed-by: Otavio Salvador
+1
We should also add something to the README file though.
In this patch I am still using the original README's:
Thanks for p
Hi Fabio,
On 15/07/2013 04:40, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> From: Fabio Estevam
>
> mx6qsabrelite and nitrogen6q boards are hardware compatible, so let's avoid
> the
> code duplication and only use the nitrogen6x source code to make board code
> maintainance easier.
>
> Tested booting a mainline dev
Hi Eric,
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Eric Nelson
wrote:
>> Agreed :-)
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Otavio Salvador
>>
>
> +1
>
> We should also add something to the README file though.
In this patch I am still using the original README's:
rename board/{freescale/mx6qsabrelite/README =>
boundary/ni
On 07/14/2013 07:58 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi Otavio,
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Otavio Salvador
wrote:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 11:40 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
From: Fabio Estevam
mx6qsabrelite and nitrogen6q boards are har
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Otavio,
>
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Otavio Salvador
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 11:40 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>>> From: Fabio Estevam
>>>
>>> mx6qsabrelite and nitrogen6q boards are hardware compatible, so let's avoi
Hi Otavio,
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Otavio Salvador
wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 11:40 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>> From: Fabio Estevam
>>
>> mx6qsabrelite and nitrogen6q boards are hardware compatible, so let's avoid
>> the
>> code duplication and only use the nitrogen6x source co
From: Fabio Estevam
mx6qsabrelite and nitrogen6q boards are hardware compatible, so let's avoid the
code duplication and only use the nitrogen6x source code to make board code
maintainance easier.
Tested booting a mainline device tree kernel on a mx6qsabrelite board.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Esteva
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 11:40 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> From: Fabio Estevam
>
> mx6qsabrelite and nitrogen6q boards are hardware compatible, so let's avoid
> the
> code duplication and only use the nitrogen6x source code to make board code
> maintainance easier.
>
> Tested booting a mainline de
10 matches
Mail list logo