Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mkimage: Build signing only if board has CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE

On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:43:18AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > At present mkimage is set up to always build with image signing support. > This means that the SSL libraries (e.g. libssl-dev) are always required. > > Adjust things so that mkimage can be built with and without image signing, > contr

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mkimage: Build signing only if board has CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE

Hi Simon, On 28/06/13 10:02, Andreas Bießmann wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On 28.06.13 08:52, Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi Andreas, >> >> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Andreas Bießmann >> mailto:andreas.de...@googlemail.com>> wrote: > > > >> > +# TODO(s...@chromium.org

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mkimage: Build signing only if board has CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE

Hi Andreas, On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Andreas Bießmann < andreas.de...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On 28.06.13 08:52, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Andreas, > > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Andreas Bießmann > > mailto:andreas.de...@googlemail.com>> > wrote: > > > > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mkimage: Build signing only if board has CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE

Hi Simon, On 28.06.13 08:52, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Andreas Bießmann > mailto:andreas.de...@googlemail.com>> wrote: > > +# TODO(s...@chromium.org ): Is this > correct on Mac OS? > > I'll check it these days.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mkimage: Build signing only if board has CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE

Hi Andreas, On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Andreas Bießmann < andreas.de...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On 27.06.13 19:43, Simon Glass wrote: > > At present mkimage is set up to always build with image signing support. > > This means that the SSL libraries (e.g. libssl-dev) are alwa

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mkimage: Build signing only if board has CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE

Hi Simon, On 27.06.13 19:43, Simon Glass wrote: > At present mkimage is set up to always build with image signing support. > This means that the SSL libraries (e.g. libssl-dev) are always required. > > Adjust things so that mkimage can be built with and without image signing, > controlled by the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mkimage: Build signing only if board has CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE

On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:55:19PM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:43:18 -0700, Simon Glass > wrote: > > > If CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE is not enabled, then mkimage will report a warning > > that signing is not supported. > > Not sure I understand this scenario. C

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mkimage: Build signing only if board has CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE

Hi Simon, On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:43:18 -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > If CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE is not enabled, then mkimage will report a warning > that signing is not supported. Not sure I understand this scenario. Can you develop? Amicalement, -- Albert.

[U-Boot] [PATCH] mkimage: Build signing only if board has CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE

At present mkimage is set up to always build with image signing support. This means that the SSL libraries (e.g. libssl-dev) are always required. Adjust things so that mkimage can be built with and without image signing, controlled by the presence of CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE in the board config file.