On 08/02/2012 07:06, Govindraj wrote:
>>
>
> Looks like this is copy paste error from my side,
> (for port2/3 it should have been bypass for port2/3 rather its port1
> set in bypass mode)
>
> I will correct this part and repost the patch.
Thanks - only for info, I have already tested with these
Hi Stefano,
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> On 07/02/2012 16:13, Stefano Babic wrote:
>> This is a strange effect. I have tested setting OMAP_EHCI_PORT_MODE_PHY
>> (of course the phy is on another port), and everything works. However,
>> after setting port_mode[2] to OMAP_U
On 07/02/2012 16:13, Stefano Babic wrote:
> This is a strange effect. I have tested setting OMAP_EHCI_PORT_MODE_PHY
> (of course the phy is on another port), and everything works. However,
> after setting port_mode[2] to OMAP_USBHS_PORT_MODE_NONE, it does not
> work anymore and no storage are detec
On 06/02/2012 15:55, Igor Grinberg wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
Hi Igor,
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_USB_EHCI
>> +
>> +static struct omap_usbhs_board_data usbhs_bdata = {
>> +.port_mode[0] = OMAP_EHCI_PORT_MODE_PHY,
>> +.port_mode[1] = OMAP_EHCI_PORT_MODE_PHY,
>> +.port_mode[2] = OMAP_EHCI_PORT_MODE
Hi Stefano,
On 02/04/12 10:07, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Changed the EHCI interface using the ulpi framework.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic
> CC: Tom Rini
> ---
>
> This patch is based and tested on top of Govindraj's patches for EHCI omap:
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/139377/
>
Changed the EHCI interface using the ulpi framework.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic
CC: Tom Rini
---
This patch is based and tested on top of Govindraj's patches for EHCI omap:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/139377/
board/technexion/twister/twister.c | 32 +
6 matches
Mail list logo
