On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 09:56:26AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Nishanth,
>
> On 12 November 2015 at 09:45, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > On 11/12/2015 10:22 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 09:16:00AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On 10 November 2015 at 08:34, Nis
Hi Nishanth,
On 12 November 2015 at 09:45, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 11/12/2015 10:22 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 09:16:00AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 10 November 2015 at 08:34, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 11/10/2015 08:55 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>
On 11/12/2015 10:22 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 09:16:00AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 10 November 2015 at 08:34, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>> On 11/10/2015 08:55 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 12:25-20151110, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> 2015-11-10 5:24 GMT+09:00 S
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 09:16:00AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10 November 2015 at 08:34, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > On 11/10/2015 08:55 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> >> On 12:25-20151110, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >>> 2015-11-10 5:24 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass :
> >> I am unhappy because I
Hi,
On 10 November 2015 at 08:34, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 11/10/2015 08:55 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> On 12:25-20151110, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>>> 2015-11-10 5:24 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass :
>> I am unhappy because I was hoping
>> we could stop creating symbolic links during building
>>
On 11/10/2015 08:55 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 12:25-20151110, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> 2015-11-10 5:24 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass :
> I am unhappy because I was hoping
> we could stop creating symbolic links during building
> in a long run.
>>>
>>> But how? I don't see that it is possi
On 12:25-20151110, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> 2015-11-10 5:24 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass :
> >>> I am unhappy because I was hoping
> >>> we could stop creating symbolic links during building
> >>> in a long run.
> >
> > But how? I don't see that it is possible if we want to have a sensible
> > prefix for
2015-11-10 5:24 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass :
>>> I am unhappy because I was hoping
>>> we could stop creating symbolic links during building
>>> in a long run.
>
> But how? I don't see that it is possible if we want to have a sensible
> prefix for each include.
[step 1] move SoC-specific headers to a
Hi Masahiro,
On 9 November 2015 at 09:37, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 11/09/2015 10:03 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> 2015-11-09 1:38 GMT+09:00 Tom Rini :
>>> On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 09:56:18AM -0600, menon.nisha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> C
On 11/09/2015 10:03 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> 2015-11-09 1:38 GMT+09:00 Tom Rini :
>> On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 09:56:18AM -0600, menon.nisha...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>>
Conceptually fine with me. Do we really need a config option for it
2015-11-09 1:38 GMT+09:00 Tom Rini :
> On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 09:56:18AM -0600, menon.nisha...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>
>> > Conceptually fine with me. Do we really need a config option for it
>> > tho?
>>
>> I was following the lines of CONFIG_CREAT
On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 09:56:18AM -0600, menon.nisha...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > Conceptually fine with me. Do we really need a config option for it
> > tho?
>
> I was following the lines of CONFIG_CREATE_ARCH_SYMLINK here. Is there
> some reason
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> Conceptually fine with me. Do we really need a config option for it
> tho?
I was following the lines of CONFIG_CREATE_ARCH_SYMLINK here. Is there
some reason why you'd not want it so?
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 03:58:17PM -0800, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 6 November 2015 at 10:23, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > On 11:10-20151106, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> >> On 11/05/2015 10:50 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >> > 2015-11-06 12:30 GMT+09:00 Nishanth Menon :
> >> >> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015
Hi,
On 6 November 2015 at 10:23, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 11:10-20151106, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> On 11/05/2015 10:50 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> > 2015-11-06 12:30 GMT+09:00 Nishanth Menon :
>> >> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>> On 5 November 201
On 11:10-20151106, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 11/05/2015 10:50 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > 2015-11-06 12:30 GMT+09:00 Nishanth Menon :
> >> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On 5 November 2015 at 00:32, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 11/05/2015 01:28 AM,
On 11/05/2015 10:50 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> 2015-11-06 12:30 GMT+09:00 Nishanth Menon :
>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 5 November 2015 at 00:32, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 11/05/2015 01:28 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> When the vendor common lib
2015-11-06 12:30 GMT+09:00 Nishanth Menon :
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 5 November 2015 at 00:32, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>> On 11/05/2015 01:28 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
When the vendor common libraries exists, then board should be able to
refere
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 5 November 2015 at 00:32, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> On 11/05/2015 01:28 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>> When the vendor common libraries exists, then board should be able to
>>> reference headers located there, rather than having to do
Hi,
On 5 November 2015 at 00:32, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 11/05/2015 01:28 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> When the vendor common libraries exists, then board should be able to
>> reference headers located there, rather than having to do weird logic
>> such as '#include "../common/xyz.h"'.
>>
>> S
On 11/05/2015 01:28 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> When the vendor common libraries exists, then board should be able to
> reference headers located there, rather than having to do weird logic
> such as '#include "../common/xyz.h"'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon
> ---
>
> Makefile
When the vendor common libraries exists, then board should be able to
reference headers located there, rather than having to do weird logic
such as '#include "../common/xyz.h"'.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon
---
Makefile| 1 +
board/ti/am57xx/board.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 i
22 matches
Mail list logo