On 11/09/2015 10:03 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > 2015-11-09 1:38 GMT+09:00 Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com>: >> On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 09:56:18AM -0600, menon.nisha...@gmail.com wrote: >>> On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Conceptually fine with me. Do we really need a config option for it >>>> tho? >>> >>> I was following the lines of CONFIG_CREATE_ARCH_SYMLINK here. Is there >>> some reason why you'd not want it so? >> >> Masahiro? >> > > Is this an improvement? > > > I am unhappy because I was hoping > we could stop creating symbolic links during building > in a long run.
OK. what do we do? option 1: #include "..common/xyz.h" 141 something usage in board files do this for now.. option 2: -I...common (auto generated - original patch) #include "xyz.h" we dont like that since it does not tell us that xyz.h is a board-common header. option 3: #include <board-common/xyz.h> this needs a soft link which we dont like either. are there any other ways to do this? -- Regards, Nishanth Menon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
