Hi Richard,
On Thursday 19 March 2009, Richard Retanubun wrote:
> Just following up on this patch, the only other action I've seen on with
> regards to this is to fake the device identification from top-boot to
> bottom boot, but I think this is more 'masking' the problem and I don't
> have enough
Hi Stefan,
Just following up on this patch, the only other action I've seen on with
regards to this is to fake the device
identification from top-boot to bottom boot, but I think this is more 'masking'
the problem and
I don't have enough visibility to see if it is a safe thing to do.
In any cas
On Friday 06 March 2009, Richard Retanubun wrote:
> >> My baseline is 2009.03-rc1. If there are STMicro/Numonyx guys on
> >> this mailing list, can you help provide a more 'generic' way of
> >> detection? this way the exception list does not have to grow a lot.
> >
> > Did you take a look at the Li
Stefan Roese wrote:
> On Friday 06 March 2009, Richard Retanubun wrote:
>> Follow up to the flash_fixup_stm to fix geometry reversal
>> on STMicro M29W320ET flash chip. The M29W320DT has 4 erase region.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Retanubun
>>
>> ---
>> My baseline is 2009.03-rc1. If there are ST
On Friday 06 March 2009, Richard Retanubun wrote:
> Follow up to the flash_fixup_stm to fix geometry reversal
> on STMicro M29W320ET flash chip. The M29W320DT has 4 erase region.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Retanubun
>
> ---
> My baseline is 2009.03-rc1. If there are STMicro/Numonyx guys on
> this
Follow up to the flash_fixup_stm to fix geometry reversal
on STMicro M29W320ET flash chip. The M29W320DT has 4 erase region.
Signed-off-by: Richard Retanubun
---
My baseline is 2009.03-rc1. If there are STMicro/Numonyx guys on
this mailing list, can you help provide a more 'generic' way of
detec
6 matches
Mail list logo
