Dear Daniel,
In message <559532a4.30...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> > Why would that be the case? We do not use any floating point stuff in
> > U-Boot...
>
> the toolchain need to provide a binary libgcc.a for each combination of
> Endianess and FPU variant otherwise you will get errors on linkin
Dear Masahiro,
In message
you wrote:
>
> > And what do you do about user space with such a broken tool chain?
> >
> > It does not help to paper over problems.
>
> Some people might want to build only U-boot from source code
> and install a pre-built distribution, maybe ?
Yes, of course. And t
Dear Masahiro,
In message
you wrote:
>
> If I revert c3dd823, I get the following error on some boards
> and with some toolchains.
>
> /opt/crosstools/sh4-gentoo-linux-gnu/bin/sh4-gentoo-linux-gnu-ld.bfd:
> /opt/crosstools/sh4-gentoo-linux-gnu/libexec/gcc/sh4-gentoo-linux-gnu/4.7.1/../../../..
Dear Masahiro,
In message
you wrote:
>
> Instead of removing CONFIG_USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC,
> I think it is better to "select" it by Kconfig.
I think CONFIG_USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC should remain, and be selectable by
Kconfig (but only if CONFIG_HAVE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC is set, see below).
And my opinion is
Hello Masahiro,
On Thu, 2 Jul 2015 21:54:44 +0900, Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
> 2015-07-02 21:43 GMT+09:00 Albert ARIBAUD :
> If you think we should take our time for this discussion,
> will you send a pull-request with currently applied change sets?
> The 2015.07 will be released in 10 days.
I am
2015-07-02 21:43 GMT+09:00 Albert ARIBAUD :
> Hello Masahiro,
>
> On Thu, 2 Jul 2015 21:21:12 +0900, Masahiro Yamada
> wrote:
>> Hi Albert,
>>
>>
>> 2015-07-02 6:21 GMT+09:00 Albert ARIBAUD :
>> > On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:21:44 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD
>> > wrote:
>> >> Hello Masahiro,
>> >>
>> >> You
Am 02.07.2015 um 09:39 schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
> Dear Daniel,
>
> In message <55947a25.5020...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>>
>> CONFIG_USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC should be removed. If an architecture supports
>> a private libgcc, then it should always use it. I think for U-Boot it is
>> better and safer to ha
Hello Masahiro,
On Thu, 2 Jul 2015 21:21:12 +0900, Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
> Hi Albert,
>
>
> 2015-07-02 6:21 GMT+09:00 Albert ARIBAUD :
> > On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:21:44 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD
> > wrote:
> >> Hello Masahiro,
> >>
> >> Your patch clashes with Pavel's already committed
> >> break-
2015-07-02 16:39 GMT+09:00 Wolfgang Denk :
> Dear Daniel,
>
> In message <55947a25.5020...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>>
>> CONFIG_USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC should be removed. If an architecture supports
>> a private libgcc, then it should always use it. I think for U-Boot it is
>> better and safer to have all
2015-07-02 21:18 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada :
> 2015-07-02 8:39 GMT+09:00 Daniel Schwierzeck :
>>
>>
>> Am 02.07.2015 um 00:04 schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
>>> Hello Wolfgang,
>>>
>>> On Wed, 01 Jul 2015 23:50:17 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>>
Actually I think it is inherently wrong to enable
Hi Albert,
2015-07-02 6:21 GMT+09:00 Albert ARIBAUD :
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:21:44 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD
> wrote:
>> Hello Masahiro,
>>
>> Your patch clashes with Pavel's already committed
>> break-if-private-libgcc-and-thumb, causing many boards to fail building.
>>
>> I am putting your patch
2015-07-02 8:39 GMT+09:00 Daniel Schwierzeck :
>
>
> Am 02.07.2015 um 00:04 schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
>> Hello Wolfgang,
>>
>> On Wed, 01 Jul 2015 23:50:17 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>
>>> Actually I think it is inherently wrong to enable
>>> CONFIG_USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC by default.
>>>
>>> This opti
Hi Wolfgang,
2015-07-02 16:34 GMT+09:00 Wolfgang Denk :
> Dear Albert,
>
> In message <20150702000427.562195b4@lilith> you wrote:
>>
>> > CONFIG_USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC should only be an emergency-opt-in, but
>> > never ever a default setting.
>>
>> Well then, should we not revisit commits c3dd823 and
Dear Daniel,
In message <55947a25.5020...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> CONFIG_USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC should be removed. If an architecture supports
> a private libgcc, then it should always use it. I think for U-Boot it is
> better and safer to have all code under control instead of pulling in
> externa
Dear Albert,
In message <20150702000427.562195b4@lilith> you wrote:
>
> > CONFIG_USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC should only be an emergency-opt-in, but
> > never ever a default setting.
>
> Well then, should we not revisit commits c3dd823 and 7bfd5ee, which
> enable CONFIG_USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC for sh and mips
Hello Daniel,
(not sure how in my previous reply I managed to drop Masahiro off the
discussion; fixing that, and apologies)
On Thu, 02 Jul 2015 01:39:17 +0200, Daniel Schwierzeck
wrote:
>
>
> Am 02.07.2015 um 00:04 schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> > Hello Wolfgang,
> >
> > On Wed, 01 Jul 2015 23:50:
Am 02.07.2015 um 00:04 schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> Hello Wolfgang,
>
> On Wed, 01 Jul 2015 23:50:17 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>
>> Actually I think it is inherently wrong to enable
>> CONFIG_USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC by default.
>>
>> This option is intended as a workaround for broken toolchains, unt
Hello Wolfgang,
On Wed, 01 Jul 2015 23:50:17 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Actually I think it is inherently wrong to enable
> CONFIG_USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC by default.
>
> This option is intended as a workaround for broken toolchains, until
> these get fixed. By enabling this by default, we miss
Dear Albert,
In message <20150701234229.705fe4ce@lilith> you wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:21:44 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD
> wrote:
> > Hello Masahiro,
> >
> > Your patch clashes with Pavel's already committed
> > break-if-private-libgcc-and-thumb, causing many boards to fail building.
> >
> > I
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:21:44 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD
wrote:
> Hello Masahiro,
>
> Your patch clashes with Pavel's already committed
> break-if-private-libgcc-and-thumb, causing many boards to fail building.
>
> I am putting your patch in 'under review' state until I can have a look
> at what happe
Note: this is when applying the patch above current u-boot-arm/master.
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:21:44 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD
wrote:
> Hello Masahiro,
>
> Your patch clashes with Pavel's already committed
> break-if-private-libgcc-and-thumb, causing many boards to fail building.
>
> I am putting your patch in 'under review' state until I can have a look
> at what happe
Hello Masahiro,
Your patch clashes with Pavel's already committed
break-if-private-libgcc-and-thumb, causing many boards to fail building.
I am putting your patch in 'under review' state until I can have a look
at what happens with private libgcc and thumb.
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
_
Use the library code in the U-Boot source tree so we do not depend
on specific tool-chains.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada
---
arch/arm/Kconfig| 3 +++
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra-common/Kconfig | 3 ---
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ar
24 matches
Mail list logo
