Hello Wolfgang,

On Wed, 01 Jul 2015 23:50:17 +0200, Wolfgang Denk <[email protected]> wrote:

> Actually I think it is inherently wrong to enable
> CONFIG_USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC by default.
> 
> This option is intended as a workaround for broken toolchains, until
> these get fixed.  By enabling this by default, we miss do not notice
> the problems our tool chain has, and therefore these never get fixed,
> i. e. brokenness grows.  This cannot be good.
> 
> CONFIG_USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC should only be an emergency-opt-in, but
> never ever a default setting.

Well then, should we not revisit commits c3dd823 and 7bfd5ee, which
enable CONFIG_USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC for sh and mips respectively? Either
we allow it by default for all architectures, or we forbid it by
default for all architectures, but I don't like the idea of a
heterogeneous per-arch default setting.

> Best regards,
> 
> Wolfgang Denk

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to