On 24/10/17 03:31, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
Hi,
> 2017-10-24 11:03 GMT+09:00 Lokesh Vutla :
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday 24 October 2017 02:04 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:08:57AM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
On Tuesday 17 October 2017 02:43 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tu
Hi Andre,
2017-10-24 11:03 GMT+09:00 Lokesh Vutla :
>
>
> On Tuesday 24 October 2017 02:04 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:08:57AM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday 17 October 2017 02:43 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 02:29:14AM +0530, Jagan Tek
On Tuesday 24 October 2017 02:04 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:08:57AM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday 17 October 2017 02:43 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 02:29:14AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Simon Glass wro
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:08:57AM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday 17 October 2017 02:43 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 02:29:14AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> >>> Hi Andre,
> >>>
> >>> On 4 October 2017 at 17:24
On Tuesday 17 October 2017 02:43 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 02:29:14AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi Andre,
>>>
>>> On 4 October 2017 at 17:24, Andre Przywara wrote:
Newer versions of the device tree compiler (righ
Hi Andre,
On 16 October 2017 at 23:30, André Przywara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry Simon for dropping the ball earlier. I will try to answer both
> Jagan's and your concern below.
>
> On 16/10/17 21:59, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi Andre,
>>>
>>> On 4
Hi,
sorry Simon for dropping the ball earlier. I will try to answer both
Jagan's and your concern below.
On 16/10/17 21:59, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Andre,
>>
>> On 4 October 2017 at 17:24, Andre Przywara wrote:
>>> Newer versions of the devi
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 2:43 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 02:29:14AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> > Hi Andre,
>> >
>> > On 4 October 2017 at 17:24, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> >> Newer versions of the device tree compiler (right
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 02:29:14AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Andre,
> >
> > On 4 October 2017 at 17:24, Andre Przywara wrote:
> >> Newer versions of the device tree compiler (rightfully) complain about
> >> mismatches between attributed
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> On 4 October 2017 at 17:24, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> Newer versions of the device tree compiler (rightfully) complain about
>> mismatches between attributed node names (name@) and a missing
>> reg property in that node.
>> Adjust
Hi Andre,
On 4 October 2017 at 17:24, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Newer versions of the device tree compiler (rightfully) complain about
> mismatches between attributed node names (name@) and a missing
> reg property in that node.
> Adjust the FIT build script for 64-bit Allwinner boards to remove th
Newer versions of the device tree compiler (rightfully) complain about
mismatches between attributed node names (name@) and a missing
reg property in that node.
Adjust the FIT build script for 64-bit Allwinner boards to remove the
bogus addresses from the node names and avoid the warnings.
Signed-
12 matches
Mail list logo
