On Tuesday 17 October 2017 02:43 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 02:29:14AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: >>> Hi Andre, >>> >>> On 4 October 2017 at 17:24, Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@arm.com> wrote: >>>> Newer versions of the device tree compiler (rightfully) complain about >>>> mismatches between attributed node names (name@<addr>) and a missing >>>> reg property in that node. >>>> Adjust the FIT build script for 64-bit Allwinner boards to remove the >>>> bogus addresses from the node names and avoid the warnings. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@arm.com> >>>> --- >>>> board/sunxi/mksunxi_fit_atf.sh | 16 ++++++++-------- >>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >>> >>> It looks like we have this problem all over the place. The >>> documentation in doc/uImage now seems to have this problem too. >>> >>> I wonder if instead we should add reg / #address-cells / #size-cells >>> properties? >> >> If the update on dts, might be an another-overhead to maintain u-boot >> dts wrt Linux dts sync. > > Anything that DTC is warning about in a dts that we get from the kernel, > should be fixed in the kernel. The kernel dtc is what we're using, and > is/will/can also complain about it.
Kernel suppress these warning by default[1] and enables these warnings with W= compiler option. May be this should be included in u-boot as well? [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/scripts/Makefile.lib#n272 Thanks and regards, Lokesh _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
