> "Kim" == Kim Phillips writes:
Hi,
>> Sure - But if we're adding _EARLY to all the configs, shouldn't we just
>> make _EARLY default (or simply get rid of the late variant?)
Kim> probably the latter. Thanks!
Great - I'll send an updated patch just doing that then instead.
>> Also fo
> "Kim" == Kim Phillips writes:
Hi,
Kim> ok let's leave it as _EARLY then. wrt boards in current u-boot, can
Kim> you add the _EARLY define in their default config files?
Sure - But if we're adding _EARLY to all the configs, shouldn't we just
make _EARLY default (or simply get rid of the
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 22:10:49 +0100
Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> > "Kim" == Kim Phillips writes:
> Kim> ok let's leave it as _EARLY then. wrt boards in current u-boot, can
> Kim> you add the _EARLY define in their default config files?
>
> Sure - But if we're adding _EARLY to all the configs,
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 21:27:30 +0100
Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> > "Kim" == Kim Phillips writes:
>
> Kim> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:42:43 +0100
> Kim> Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>
> >> E.G. on a 8347 board a bootup time increase of ~600ms has been observed:
>
> Kim> heh, even more on an 8313! Th
> "Kim" == Kim Phillips writes:
Kim> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:42:43 +0100
Kim> Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>> E.G. on a 8347 board a bootup time increase of ~600ms has been observed:
Kim> heh, even more on an 8313! Thanks for this - I hadn't realized the
Kim> difference was so large (or neg
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:42:43 +0100
Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> E.G. on a 8347 board a bootup time increase of ~600ms has been observed:
heh, even more on an 8313! Thanks for this - I hadn't realized the
difference was so large (or neglected it since the move to init_r was
done at the last moment).
Dear Kim,
In message <20091204185150.1e2939e8.kim.phill...@freescale.com> you wrote:
>
> > It seems Kim is on vacation or something like that.
>
> I was, but I'm back now.
I hope you had a good time. Welcome back.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfga
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 01:29:25 +0100
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Peter Korsgaard,
>
> In message <87pr7472vw@macbook.be.48ers.dk> you wrote:
> > > "Peter" == Peter Korsgaard writes:
> >
> > Peter> Commit c7190f02 (retain POR values of non-configured ACR, SPCR,
> > SCCR,
> > Peter> and
Dear Peter Korsgaard,
In message <87pr7472vw@macbook.be.48ers.dk> you wrote:
> > "Peter" == Peter Korsgaard writes:
>
> Peter> Commit c7190f02 (retain POR values of non-configured ACR, SPCR, SCCR,
> Peter> and LCRR bitfields) moved the LCRR assignment to after relocation
> Peter> to R
> "Peter" == Peter Korsgaard writes:
Peter> Commit c7190f02 (retain POR values of non-configured ACR, SPCR, SCCR,
Peter> and LCRR bitfields) moved the LCRR assignment to after relocation
Peter> to RAM because of the potential problem with changing the local bus
Peter> clock while executin
Commit c7190f02 (retain POR values of non-configured ACR, SPCR, SCCR,
and LCRR bitfields) moved the LCRR assignment to after relocation
to RAM because of the potential problem with changing the local bus
clock while executing from flash.
For some boards this isn't needed (E.G. when running from a
11 matches
Mail list logo
