On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 22:10:49 +0100 Peter Korsgaard <jac...@sunsite.dk> wrote:
> >>>>> "Kim" == Kim Phillips <kim.phill...@freescale.com> writes: > Kim> ok let's leave it as _EARLY then. wrt boards in current u-boot, can > Kim> you add the _EARLY define in their default config files? > > Sure - But if we're adding _EARLY to all the configs, shouldn't we just > make _EARLY default (or simply get rid of the late variant?) probably the latter. Thanks! > Kim> I'm trying to extend the benefit of the patch to existing boards, > Kim> not only out-of-tree boards. Speaking of which, new board patches > Kim> are welcome. > > Also for specialized (E.G. non-evaluation boards / consumer products) > boards? I have no problem submitting them, I just see very limited added > value for others. sure, why not? It allows me and others to see and allow for such real use-cases, plus you get the benefit of not having to maintain patches externally. Kim _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
