Hi Tom,
>> I need the tests to run on the test.dts and not the default sandbox.dts.
>> The documentation states to use -T for that when doing the checks
>> locally. Unfortunately, the Azure pipelines do use the default sandbox
>> DT. I can add few mostly useless nodes to the default DTS for the te
>> > I see that the Azure failure is:
>> > https://dev.azure.com/u-boot/u-boot/_build/results?buildId=10824&view=results
>> > which was the unfortunate "next is broken because master has a fix and
>> > next has a test that needed updating now" that happened this week with
>> > -rc5 being merged. So
On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 09:39:23AM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> On 27/03/2025 at 08:14:42 -06, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 10:31:18AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> >> Hi Miquel,
> >>
> >> On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 12:01 PM Miquel Raynal
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I rebased this w
On 27/03/2025 at 08:14:42 -06, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 10:31:18AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>> Hi Miquel,
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 12:01 PM Miquel Raynal
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I rebased this work on the latest next, fixed the conflicts, adapted my
>> > changes to use Svyat
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 10:31:18AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Miquel,
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 12:01 PM Miquel Raynal
> wrote:
>
> > I rebased this work on the latest next, fixed the conflicts, adapted my
> > changes to use Svyatoslav's work, fixed the CI.
>
> v5 still fails in CI:
>
Hi Miquel,
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 12:01 PM Miquel Raynal
wrote:
> I rebased this work on the latest next, fixed the conflicts, adapted my
> changes to use Svyatoslav's work, fixed the CI.
v5 still fails in CI:
https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-imx/-/pipelines/25364
> Then I pus
Hi Fabio,
On 13/03/2025 at 15:26:30 -03, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Miquel,
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 2:15 PM Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
>
>> If seems that we are working on the same OF graph stuff
>
> Yes, there is a conflict in next when I try to apply your series due
> to recent commits from Sv
Hi Miquel,
On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 2:15 PM Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> If seems that we are working on the same OF graph stuff
Yes, there is a conflict in next when I try to apply your series due
to recent commits from Svyatoslav.
Please rebase against the latest next, run it through CI, and subm
On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 3:17 PM Tom Rini wrote:
> The series is delayed until someone has a chance to look harder at
> what's causing the handoff test to now fail.
Ok, I marked this series as "Changes Requested" in patchwork.
Miquel, please make sure the next version passes CI.
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 10:00:11AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Miquel,
>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 9:51 AM Miquel Raynal
> wrote:
>
> > Why not just waiting for someone to tackle this issue with the CI? The
> > handoff test is failing, there is nothing that can go through any tree
> > at th
Hi Miquel,
On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 9:51 AM Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Why not just waiting for someone to tackle this issue with the CI? The
> handoff test is failing, there is nothing that can go through any tree
> at the moment, no? It is not just blocking this series in particular, I
> guess?
Wit
Hi Fabio,
On 06/03/2025 at 09:38:29 -03, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 3:17 PM Tom Rini wrote:
>
>> The series is delayed until someone has a chance to look harder at
>> what's causing the handoff test to now fail.
>
> Ok, I marked this series as "Changes Requested" in patchwork
On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 03:12:09PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 2:06 PM Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > It's a tangential failure. Svyatoslav reported this with a series he's
> > working on and Simon wonders if bloblist support got broken but hasn't
> > had time to look at it.
>
>
On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 2:06 PM Tom Rini wrote:
> It's a tangential failure. Svyatoslav reported this with a series he's
> working on and Simon wonders if bloblist support got broken but hasn't
> had time to look at it.
Please let me know how to proceed with this error.
Because of this error, I
You may try this if you wish to simplify your uclass wrapper
https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-tegra/-/commits/graph?ref_type=heads
пн, 3 бер. 2025 р. о 19:06 Tom Rini пише:
>
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 09:31:37AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > Hi Miquel,
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 7:22 AM Miquel Raynal
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > In order to display a boot picture or an error message, the i.MX8MP
> > > display pipeline must
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 09:31:37AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Miquel,
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 7:22 AM Miquel Raynal
> wrote:
> >
> > In order to display a boot picture or an error message, the i.MX8MP
> > display pipeline must be enabled. The SoC has support for various
> > interfaces
Hi Miquel,
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 7:22 AM Miquel Raynal wrote:
>
> In order to display a boot picture or an error message, the i.MX8MP
> display pipeline must be enabled. The SoC has support for various
> interfaces (LVDS, HDMI, DSI). The one supported in this series is the
> standard 4-lane LVD
In order to display a boot picture or an error message, the i.MX8MP
display pipeline must be enabled. The SoC has support for various
interfaces (LVDS, HDMI, DSI). The one supported in this series is the
standard 4-lane LVDS output. The minimal setup is thus composed of:
* An LCD InterFace (LCDIF)
19 matches
Mail list logo
