Hi Quentin,
On Mon, 24 Oct 2022 at 03:26, Quentin Schulz
wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 10/22/22 03:06, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Quentin,
> >
> > On Fri, 30 Sept 2022 at 17:49, Simon Glass wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 30 Sept 2022 at 08:37, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> >>>
> >>> From: Quentin Schulz
> >>
Hi Simon,
On 10/22/22 03:06, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Quentin,
On Fri, 30 Sept 2022 at 17:49, Simon Glass wrote:
On Fri, 30 Sept 2022 at 08:37, Quentin Schulz wrote:
From: Quentin Schulz
The binary is looked on the system by the suffix of the packer class.
This means binman was looking for
Hi Quentin,
On Fri, 30 Sept 2022 at 17:49, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> On Fri, 30 Sept 2022 at 08:37, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> >
> > From: Quentin Schulz
> >
> > The binary is looked on the system by the suffix of the packer class.
> > This means binman was looking for btool_gzip on the system and no
On Fri, 30 Sept 2022 at 08:37, Quentin Schulz wrote:
>
> From: Quentin Schulz
>
> The binary is looked on the system by the suffix of the packer class.
> This means binman was looking for btool_gzip on the system and not gzip.
>
> Since a btool can have its btool_ prefix missing but its module an
From: Quentin Schulz
The binary is looked on the system by the suffix of the packer class.
This means binman was looking for btool_gzip on the system and not gzip.
Since a btool can have its btool_ prefix missing but its module and
binary presence on the system appropriately found, there's no ne
5 matches
Mail list logo
