Well, you tell me! At the moment I don't see much preventing people from
> enabling it on the S900, and your compatible string listing in the
> driver includes the S900 one.
>
I just checked, it's DMA descriptor structure that differs between two but
I think
This is not relevant here.
Only thing
On 23/12/2020 12:29, Amit Tomar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks again for the detailed review
>
> +
>
> > 3 files changed, 407 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/mmc/owl_mmc.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/Kconfig b/drivers/m
Hi,
Thanks again for the detailed review
+
> > 3 files changed, 407 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/mmc/owl_mmc.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/Kconfig b/drivers/mmc/Kconfig
> > index 14d7913..61f9c67 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/
On 23/12/2020 04:25, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> On 12/23/20 11:22 AM, Amit Tomer wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 5:57 AM André Przywara
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 19/12/2020 14:51, Amit Singh Tomar wrote:
From: Amit Singh Tomar
This commit adds support for MMC controllers found on Actions
Thanks for Cc.
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] mmc: actions: add MMC driver for Actions OWL
> S700
>
> Hi Amit,
>
> On 12/23/20 2:59 PM, Amit Tomar wrote:
> > Hi Jaehoon
> >
> > I had already mentioned about making more readable than now.
> >
> >&
Hi Amit,
On 12/23/20 2:59 PM, Amit Tomar wrote:
> Hi Jaehoon
>
> I had already mentioned about making more readable than now.
>
>>
>> if (rate <= 100) {
>> rdelay = wdelay = OWL_SD_DELAY_LOW_CLK;
>> } else if ( ...) {
>> rdelay = wdelay = OWL_SD_DELAY_MID_CLK;
>> } else if (.
Hi Jaehoon
I had already mentioned about making more readable than now.
>
> if (rate <= 100) {
> rdelay = wdelay = OWL_SD_DELAY_LOW_CLK;
> } else if ( ...) {
> rdelay = wdelay = OWL_SD_DELAY_MID_CLK;
> } else if () {
> rdelay = OWL_SD_RDELAY_HIGH;
> wdelay
On 12/23/20 11:22 AM, Amit Tomer wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 5:57 AM André Przywara wrote:
>>
>> On 19/12/2020 14:51, Amit Singh Tomar wrote:
>>> From: Amit Singh Tomar
>>>
>>> This commit adds support for MMC controllers found on Actions OWL
>>> S700 SoC platform.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ami
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 5:57 AM André Przywara wrote:
>
> On 19/12/2020 14:51, Amit Singh Tomar wrote:
> > From: Amit Singh Tomar
> >
> > This commit adds support for MMC controllers found on Actions OWL
> > S700 SoC platform.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Amit Singh Tomar
> > ---
> > Changes since pre
On 19/12/2020 14:51, Amit Singh Tomar wrote:
> From: Amit Singh Tomar
>
> This commit adds support for MMC controllers found on Actions OWL
> S700 SoC platform.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Singh Tomar
> ---
> Changes since previous version
> * Corrected block count to 512.
> * Changed t
On 22/12/2020 23:37, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> On 12/19/20 11:51 PM, Amit Singh Tomar wrote:
>> From: Amit Singh Tomar
>>
>> This commit adds support for MMC controllers found on Actions OWL
>> S700 SoC platform.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amit Singh Tomar
>> ---
>> Changes since previous version
>>
On 12/19/20 11:51 PM, Amit Singh Tomar wrote:
> From: Amit Singh Tomar
>
> This commit adds support for MMC controllers found on Actions OWL
> S700 SoC platform.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Singh Tomar
> ---
> Changes since previous version
> * Corrected block count to 512.
> * Changed
From: Amit Singh Tomar
This commit adds support for MMC controllers found on Actions OWL
S700 SoC platform.
Signed-off-by: Amit Singh Tomar
---
Changes since previous version
* Corrected block count to 512.
* Changed the command timeout value to 30ms.
* Used readl_poll_t
13 matches
Mail list logo
