On 9/23/23 19:50, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 11:40 AM Eugen Hristev
wrote:
On 9/22/23 12:08, Alexander Dahl wrote:
Adapt behaviour to Linux kernel driver.
The return value of gpio_request_by_name_nodev() was not checked before,
and thus in case 'rb-gpios' was
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 11:40 AM Eugen Hristev
wrote:
>
> On 9/22/23 12:08, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> > Adapt behaviour to Linux kernel driver.
> >
> > The return value of gpio_request_by_name_nodev() was not checked before,
> > and thus in case 'rb-gpios' was missing in DT, rb.type was set to
> > A
On 9/22/23 12:08, Alexander Dahl wrote:
Adapt behaviour to Linux kernel driver.
The return value of gpio_request_by_name_nodev() was not checked before,
and thus in case 'rb-gpios' was missing in DT, rb.type was set to
ATMEL_NAND_GPIO_RB nevertheless, leading to output like this for
example (on
Adapt behaviour to Linux kernel driver.
The return value of gpio_request_by_name_nodev() was not checked before,
and thus in case 'rb-gpios' was missing in DT, rb.type was set to
ATMEL_NAND_GPIO_RB nevertheless, leading to output like this for
example (on sam9x60-curiosity with the line removed fr
4 matches
Mail list logo
