On 8/18/23 07:27, Andre Przywara wrote:
Hi Andre,
So instead of trying to derive some pattern from where there is none, I'd
rather do: config SUNXI_CPU_HOTPLUG_ADDRESS
hex
default 0x01c000bc if MACH_SUN8I_R40
But the hotplug flag register is at 0x01c000b8 for R40?
..
On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 18:48:49 -0700
Sam Edwards wrote:
Hi Sam,
> On 8/15/23 15:59, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > Hi Sam,
>
> Hi Andre,
>
> > So that's a bit more nasty indeed. I don't even know if R_CPUCFG really
> > makes sense here, as the _R_ term typically refers to the management
> > process
On 8/15/23 15:59, Andre Przywara wrote:
Hi Sam,
Hi Andre,
So that's a bit more nasty indeed. I don't even know if R_CPUCFG really
makes sense here, as the _R_ term typically refers to the management
processor, which the D1/R528 don't have. Or at least the always-on power
domain, but then agai
On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 13:17:33 -0600
Sam Edwards wrote:
Hi Sam,
> On 8/14/23 08:16, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > Hi Sam,
> >
> >> This patch adds the necessary code to make nonsec booting and PSCI
> >> secondary core management functional on the R528/T113.
> >
> > Unfortunately this patch break
On 8/14/23 08:16, Andre Przywara wrote:
Hi Sam,
This patch adds the necessary code to make nonsec booting and PSCI
secondary core management functional on the R528/T113.
Unfortunately this patch breaks the build on older 32-bit SoCs, as
SUNXI_CPUX_BASE is not defined there. That's a typical p
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 18:30:55 -0600
Sam Edwards wrote:
Hi Sam,
> This patch adds the necessary code to make nonsec booting and PSCI
> secondary core management functional on the R528/T113.
Unfortunately this patch breaks the build on older 32-bit SoCs, as
SUNXI_CPUX_BASE is not defined there. Th
This patch adds the necessary code to make nonsec booting and PSCI
secondary core management functional on the R528/T113.
Signed-off-by: Sam Edwards
Tested-by: Maksim Kiselev
---
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/psci.c | 47 -
arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig | 2 ++
inc
7 matches
Mail list logo
