Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm: dts: k3-*-r5: Remove clocks from mcu_timer0

2025-05-15 Thread Manorit Chawdhry
Hi Francesco, On 12:18-20250515, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > Hello Manorit, > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 05:32:51PM +0530, Manorit Chawdhry wrote: > > Updated PLL driver sequencing requires us to use udelay in the PLL > > driver as there is no poll bit to get the status of operations. > > tick-time

Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm: dts: k3-*-r5: Remove clocks from mcu_timer0

2025-05-15 Thread Francesco Dolcini
Hello Manorit, On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 05:32:51PM +0530, Manorit Chawdhry wrote: > Updated PLL driver sequencing requires us to use udelay in the PLL > driver as there is no poll bit to get the status of operations. > tick-timer(mcu_timer0/main_timer0) setting up the clocks for itself is > somethi

[PATCH 1/3] arm: dts: k3-*-r5: Remove clocks from mcu_timer0

2024-11-21 Thread Manorit Chawdhry
Updated PLL driver sequencing requires us to use udelay in the PLL driver as there is no poll bit to get the status of operations. tick-timer(mcu_timer0/main_timer0) setting up the clocks for itself is something that won't work as the PLL driver will be using udelay and PLLs are configured during c