Hi Michal, Heinrich,
On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 00:54, Michal Simek wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11. 12. 20 8:42, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > On 12/11/20 8:28 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
> >> Hi Simon,
> >>
> >> On 10. 12. 20 18:46, Simon Glass wrote:
> >>> Hi Michal,
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 10:33, Mi
On 11. 12. 20 8:42, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 12/11/20 8:28 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On 10. 12. 20 18:46, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi Michal,
>>>
>>> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 10:33, Michal Simek
>>> wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 10. 12. 20 18:27, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 10. 12. 20 18:46, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 10:33, Michal Simek wrote:
>>
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On 10. 12. 20 18:27, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi Michal,
>>>
>>> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 00:34, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi,
On 09. 12. 20 17:30
On 12/11/20 8:28 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 10. 12. 20 18:46, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Michal,
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 10:33, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 10. 12. 20 18:27, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Michal,
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 00:34, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi,
On 09. 12. 20 17:
Hi Michal,
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 10:33, Michal Simek wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 10. 12. 20 18:27, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Michal,
> >
> > On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 00:34, Michal Simek wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 09. 12. 20 17:30, Michael Walle wrote:
> >>> Hi Simon,
> >>>
> >>> Am 2020-12
Hi Simon,
On 10. 12. 20 18:27, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 00:34, Michal Simek wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 09. 12. 20 17:30, Michael Walle wrote:
>>> Hi Simon,
>>>
>>> Am 2020-12-09 17:23, schrieb Simon Glass:
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 15:52, Michael Walle wrote:
>
Hi Michal,
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 00:34, Michal Simek wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 09. 12. 20 17:30, Michael Walle wrote:
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > Am 2020-12-09 17:23, schrieb Simon Glass:
> >> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 15:52, Michael Walle wrote:
> >>> Am 2020-11-30 02:53, schrieb Simon Glass:
> >>> > At pre
Hi,
On 09. 12. 20 17:30, Michael Walle wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Am 2020-12-09 17:23, schrieb Simon Glass:
>> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 15:52, Michael Walle wrote:
>>> Am 2020-11-30 02:53, schrieb Simon Glass:
>>> > At present each device has two sequence numbers, with 'req_seq' being
>>> > set up at b
Hi Simon,
Am 2020-12-09 17:23, schrieb Simon Glass:
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 15:52, Michael Walle wrote:
Am 2020-11-30 02:53, schrieb Simon Glass:
> At present each device has two sequence numbers, with 'req_seq' being
> set up at bind time and 'seq' at probe time. The idea is that devices
> can
Hi Tom,
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 09:19, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 11:52:07PM +0100, Michael Walle wrote:
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > Am 2020-11-30 02:53, schrieb Simon Glass:
> > > At present each device has two sequence numbers, with 'req_seq' being
> > > set up at bind time and 'seq' a
Hi Michael,
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 15:52, Michael Walle wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> Am 2020-11-30 02:53, schrieb Simon Glass:
> > At present each device has two sequence numbers, with 'req_seq' being
> > set up at bind time and 'seq' at probe time. The idea is that devices
> > can 'request' a sequenc
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 11:52:07PM +0100, Michael Walle wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Am 2020-11-30 02:53, schrieb Simon Glass:
> > At present each device has two sequence numbers, with 'req_seq' being
> > set up at bind time and 'seq' at probe time. The idea is that devices
> > can 'request' a sequence
Hi Simon,
Am 2020-11-30 02:53, schrieb Simon Glass:
At present each device has two sequence numbers, with 'req_seq' being
set up at bind time and 'seq' at probe time. The idea is that devices
can 'request' a sequence number and then the conflicts are resolved
when
the device is probed.
This m
Hi Heinrich,
On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 at 01:32, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
> On 11/30/20 2:53 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> > At present each device has two sequence numbers, with 'req_seq' being
> > set up at bind time and 'seq' at probe time. The idea is that devices
> > can 'request' a sequence number
On 11/30/20 2:53 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
At present each device has two sequence numbers, with 'req_seq' being
set up at bind time and 'seq' at probe time. The idea is that devices
can 'request' a sequence number and then the conflicts are resolved when
the device is probed.
This makes things com
At present each device has two sequence numbers, with 'req_seq' being
set up at bind time and 'seq' at probe time. The idea is that devices
can 'request' a sequence number and then the conflicts are resolved when
the device is probed.
This makes things complicated in a few cases, since we don't re
16 matches
Mail list logo
