On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 10:56:18PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 September 2021 23:49:57 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Wednesday 01 September 2021 23:44:52 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 01 September 2021 17:33:57 Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 11:28:54PM +0200, Pali
On Wednesday 01 September 2021 23:49:57 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 September 2021 23:44:52 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Wednesday 01 September 2021 17:33:57 Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 11:28:54PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 01 September 2021 17:17:06 Tom Rin
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 11:44:52PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 September 2021 17:33:57 Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 11:28:54PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 01 September 2021 17:17:06 Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 11:05:45PM +0200, Pali
On Wednesday 01 September 2021 23:44:52 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 September 2021 17:33:57 Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 11:28:54PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 01 September 2021 17:17:06 Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 11:05:45PM +0200, Pali Ro
On Wednesday 01 September 2021 17:33:57 Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 11:28:54PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Wednesday 01 September 2021 17:17:06 Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 11:05:45PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 01 September 2021 16:59:09 Tom Rin
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 11:28:54PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 September 2021 17:17:06 Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 11:05:45PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 01 September 2021 16:59:09 Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 03:18:27PM +0200, Pali
On Wednesday 01 September 2021 17:17:06 Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 11:05:45PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Wednesday 01 September 2021 16:59:09 Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 03:18:27PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > >
> > > > Including timestamp.h (either directly o
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 11:05:45PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 September 2021 16:59:09 Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 03:18:27PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> >
> > > Including timestamp.h (either directly or transitionally) cause build
> > > system to recompile binaries a
On Wednesday 01 September 2021 16:59:09 Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 03:18:27PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> > Including timestamp.h (either directly or transitionally) cause build
> > system to recompile binaries at every 'make' run. This has disadvantage
> > in U-Boot development as
On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 03:18:27PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Including timestamp.h (either directly or transitionally) cause build
> system to recompile binaries at every 'make' run. This has disadvantage
> in U-Boot development as for every small change 'make' recompiles lot of
> other irrelevan
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 01:02:41PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 02 August 2021 15:18:27 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Including timestamp.h (either directly or transitionally) cause build
> > system to recompile binaries at every 'make' run. This has disadvantage
> > in U-Boot development as for ev
On Monday 02 August 2021 15:18:27 Pali Rohár wrote:
> Including timestamp.h (either directly or transitionally) cause build
> system to recompile binaries at every 'make' run. This has disadvantage
> in U-Boot development as for every small change 'make' recompiles lot of
> other irrelevant files w
Including timestamp.h (either directly or transitionally) cause build
system to recompile binaries at every 'make' run. This has disadvantage
in U-Boot development as for every small change 'make' recompiles lot of
other irrelevant files which were not touched / changed.
This patch series eliminat
13 matches
Mail list logo