On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 01:16:33PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 03:52:00AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 10/2/22 01:57, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > > Any thoughts or comments ?
> > > > In our Docker container command
> > > >
> > > > tools/buildman/buildman -o b
On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 03:52:00AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
>
> On 10/2/22 01:57, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > Any thoughts or comments ?
> > > In our Docker container command
> > >
> > > tools/buildman/buildman -o build -w -E -W -e --board qemu-riscv32_spl
> > >
> > > leads to build/too
On 10/2/22 01:57, Tom Rini wrote:
Any thoughts or comments ?
In our Docker container command
tools/buildman/buildman -o build -w -E -W -e --board qemu-riscv32_spl
leads to build/toolchain with content
gcc /opt/gcc-11.1.0-nolibc/riscv64-linux/bin/riscv64-linux-gcc
path /opt/gcc-11.1.0-noli
On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 01:24:08AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 3/9/22 07:31, Leo Liang wrote:
> > Hi Alex,
> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 11:06:18AM +, Leo Liang wrote:
> > > Hi Alex,
> > > On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 03:21:56AM +, Leo Liang wrote:
> > > > Hi Alex,
> > > > On Mon, Feb 2
On 3/9/22 07:31, Leo Liang wrote:
Hi Alex,
On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 11:06:18AM +, Leo Liang wrote:
Hi Alex,
On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 03:21:56AM +, Leo Liang wrote:
Hi Alex,
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 05:42:41PM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 9:52 AM Leo Liang wrote:
Am Freitag, 28. Januar 2022, 14:47:13 CEST schrieb Alexandre Ghiti:
> The following description is copied from the equivalent patch for the
> Linux Kernel proposed by Aurelien Jarno:
>
> From version 2.38, binutils default to ISA spec version 20191213. This
> means that the csr read/write (csrr*/c
Hi Alex,
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 11:14:32AM +0200, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> Hi Leo,
> > A gentle ping.
> >
> > Any comments?
> > Or should we spin a patch for updating the toolchain used for 32 bit build?
>
> Sorry for being very slow here, if the patch is too much of a burden,
> maybe you should
Hi Leo,
On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 11:13 AM Leo Liang wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 09:03:08AM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> > Hi Leo,
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 7:31 AM Leo Liang wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Alex,
> > > On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 11:06:18AM +, Leo Liang wrote:
> > >
Hi Alex,
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 09:03:08AM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> Hi Leo,
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 7:31 AM Leo Liang wrote:
> >
> > Hi Alex,
> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 11:06:18AM +, Leo Liang wrote:
> > > Hi Alex,
> > > On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 03:21:56AM +, Leo Liang wrote:
>
Hi Leo,
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 7:31 AM Leo Liang wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 11:06:18AM +, Leo Liang wrote:
> > Hi Alex,
> > On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 03:21:56AM +, Leo Liang wrote:
> > > Hi Alex,
> > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 05:42:41PM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> > >
Hi Alex,
On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 11:06:18AM +, Leo Liang wrote:
> Hi Alex,
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 03:21:56AM +, Leo Liang wrote:
> > Hi Alex,
> > On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 05:42:41PM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 9:52 AM Leo Liang wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Al
Hi Alex,
On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 03:21:56AM +, Leo Liang wrote:
> Hi Alex,
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 05:42:41PM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 9:52 AM Leo Liang wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Alex,
> > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 11:28:46AM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> > > >
Hi Alex,
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 05:42:41PM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 9:52 AM Leo Liang wrote:
> >
> > Hi Alex,
> > On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 11:28:46AM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> > > Hi Leo,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 10:25 AM Leo Liang wrote:
> > > >
>
On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 9:52 AM Leo Liang wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 11:28:46AM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> > Hi Leo,
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 10:25 AM Leo Liang wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Alexandre,
> > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 02:47:13PM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
>
Hi Alex,
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 11:28:46AM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> Hi Leo,
>
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 10:25 AM Leo Liang wrote:
> >
> > Hi Alexandre,
> > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 02:47:13PM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> > > The following description is copied from the equivalent patch
Hi Leo,
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 10:25 AM Leo Liang wrote:
>
> Hi Alexandre,
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 02:47:13PM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> > The following description is copied from the equivalent patch for the
> > Linux Kernel proposed by Aurelien Jarno:
> >
> > From version 2.38, binutils
Hi Alexandre,
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 02:47:13PM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> The following description is copied from the equivalent patch for the
> Linux Kernel proposed by Aurelien Jarno:
>
> From version 2.38, binutils default to ISA spec version 20191213. This
> means that the csr read/wri
On 2022-01-28 19:19, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2022-01-28 19:03, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > On 1/28/22 14:47, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> > > The following description is copied from the equivalent patch for the
> > > Linux Kernel proposed by Aurelien Jarno:
> > >
> > > From version 2.38, binut
On 1/28/22 19:03, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 1/28/22 14:47, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
The following description is copied from the equivalent patch for the
Linux Kernel proposed by Aurelien Jarno:
From version 2.38, binutils default to ISA spec version 20191213. This
means that the csr read/wr
On 2022-01-28 19:03, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 1/28/22 14:47, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> > The following description is copied from the equivalent patch for the
> > Linux Kernel proposed by Aurelien Jarno:
> >
> > From version 2.38, binutils default to ISA spec version 20191213. This
> > mean
On 1/28/22 14:47, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
The following description is copied from the equivalent patch for the
Linux Kernel proposed by Aurelien Jarno:
From version 2.38, binutils default to ISA spec version 20191213. This
means that the csr read/write (csrr*/csrw*) instructions and fence.i
ins
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 9:47 PM Alexandre Ghiti
wrote:
>
> The following description is copied from the equivalent patch for the
> Linux Kernel proposed by Aurelien Jarno:
>
> From version 2.38, binutils default to ISA spec version 20191213. This
> means that the csr read/write (csrr*/csrw*) instr
The following description is copied from the equivalent patch for the
Linux Kernel proposed by Aurelien Jarno:
>From version 2.38, binutils default to ISA spec version 20191213. This
means that the csr read/write (csrr*/csrw*) instructions and fence.i
instruction has separated from the `I` extensi
23 matches
Mail list logo