On Sun, 26 Jan 2020 01:40:13 +0100
Soeren Moch wrote:
> >> Why do you define CONFIG_BOOTCOMMAND here instead of modifying the
> >> existing one?
> > I'm a bit confused with it: There seem to be many way to do the same
> > thing and I'm not sure which one is the best.
> >
> > Because of that, I
On 28.01.20 18:02, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jan 2020 01:40:13 +0100
> Soeren Moch wrote:
>>> Ahh ok, now I understand. That probably explains the repeated size
>>> issues.
>> Why? With SPL+u-boot proper it would be even worse, since then there
>> is a gap between SPL and u-boo
On Sun, 26 Jan 2020 01:40:13 +0100
Soeren Moch wrote:
> > Ahh ok, now I understand. That probably explains the repeated size
> > issues.
> Why? With SPL+u-boot proper it would be even worse, since then there
> is a gap between SPL and u-boot, u-boot starts at higher address in
> eMMC, and it would
On 26.01.20 00:15, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 20:52:36 +0100
> Soeren Moch wrote:
>
>> Hi Denis,
> Hi,
>
>> thanks for your patch. In general I think it could be a good idea to
>> support distroboot on this board, especially if we can maintain
>> compatibility with the exi
On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 20:52:36 +0100
Soeren Moch wrote:
> Hi Denis,
Hi,
> thanks for your patch. In general I think it could be a good idea to
> support distroboot on this board, especially if we can maintain
> compatibility with the existing boot procedure. However, since this
> board repeatedly
On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 08:56:12PM +0100, Soeren Moch wrote:
> On 25.01.20 17:24, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 02:42:40AM +0100, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote:
> >
> >> This keeps the compatibility with the old bootcmd.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
> > First, I hav
On 25.01.20 17:24, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 02:42:40AM +0100, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote:
>
>> This keeps the compatibility with the old bootcmd.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
> First, I have concerns about this increasing the size of the board.
>
>> ---
>> includ
Hi Denis,
thanks for your patch. In general I think it could be a good idea to
support distroboot on this board, especially if we can maintain
compatibility with the existing boot procedure. However, since this
board repeatedly has size problems with the u-boot binary, we carefully
need to check b
On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 02:42:40AM +0100, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote:
> This keeps the compatibility with the old bootcmd.
>
> Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
First, I have concerns about this increasing the size of the board.
> ---
> include/configs/tbs2910.h | 39 +++
This keeps the compatibility with the old bootcmd.
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
---
include/configs/tbs2910.h | 39 ++-
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/tbs2910.h b/include/configs/tbs2910.h
index b598fca1
10 matches
Mail list logo