Hi Simon and Quentin,
On 2023-02-04 23:23, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Quentin,
>
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 at 03:54, Quentin Schulz
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Kever,
>>
>> On 1/31/23 03:53, Kever Yang wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I think I do this modify for those soc not have TPL, or else it
>>> will cause the C
Hi Quentin,
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 at 03:54, Quentin Schulz
wrote:
>
> Hi Kever,
>
> On 1/31/23 03:53, Kever Yang wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I think I do this modify for those soc not have TPL, or else it
> > will cause the CI build error.
> >
> >
> > TPL/ddr binary is mandatory in all rockchip SoCs
Hi Kever,
On 1/31/23 03:53, Kever Yang wrote:
Hi
I think I do this modify for those soc not have TPL, or else it
will cause the CI build error.
TPL/ddr binary is mandatory in all rockchip SoCs now, but the mainline
U-Boot may not
able to provide the the available TPL, will need ddr
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 10:53:38AM +0800, Kever Yang wrote:
> Hi
>
> I think I do this modify for those soc not have TPL, or else it will
> cause the CI build error.
>
>
> TPL/ddr binary is mandatory in all rockchip SoCs now, but the mainline
> U-Boot may not
>
> able to provide the the ava
Hi
I think I do this modify for those soc not have TPL, or else it
will cause the CI build error.
TPL/ddr binary is mandatory in all rockchip SoCs now, but the mainline
U-Boot may not
able to provide the the available TPL, will need ddr init binary from
rockchip rkbin repository
ins
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 02:44:52AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2023 at 20:45, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 08:29:35PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 at 12:51, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This reverts commit f5315dd6290a588434e4f79bfd2886b
On Mon, 30 Jan 2023 at 20:45, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 08:29:35PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 at 12:51, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > >
> > > This reverts commit f5315dd6290a588434e4f79bfd2886bb7df9210d.
> > >
> > > [why]
> > > TPL is not mandatory for not all Rock
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 12:51:33PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> This reverts commit f5315dd6290a588434e4f79bfd2886bb7df9210d.
>
> [why]
> TPL is not mandatory for not all Rockchip SoCs, some SoCs like
> RK356x, and RK3588 still use mainline u-boot without TPL as
> their ddr init programs are access
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 08:29:35PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 at 12:51, Jagan Teki wrote:
> >
> > This reverts commit f5315dd6290a588434e4f79bfd2886bb7df9210d.
> >
> > [why]
> > TPL is not mandatory for not all Rockchip SoCs, some SoCs like
> > RK356x, and RK3588 still use main
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 at 12:51, Jagan Teki wrote:
>
> This reverts commit f5315dd6290a588434e4f79bfd2886bb7df9210d.
>
> [why]
> TPL is not mandatory for not all Rockchip SoCs, some SoCs like
> RK356x, and RK3588 still use mainline u-boot without TPL as
> their ddr init programs are accessed via bina
Hi Jagan,
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 at 12:52, Jagan Teki wrote:
>
> This reverts commit f5315dd6290a588434e4f79bfd2886bb7df9210d.
>
> [why]
> TPL is not mandatory for not all Rockchip SoCs, some SoCs like
> RK356x, and RK3588 still use mainline u-boot without TPL as
> their ddr init programs are access
This reverts commit f5315dd6290a588434e4f79bfd2886bb7df9210d.
[why]
TPL is not mandatory for not all Rockchip SoCs, some SoCs like
RK356x, and RK3588 still use mainline u-boot without TPL as
their ddr init programs are accessed via binaries provided by
Rockchip instead of ddr source code.
Marking
12 matches
Mail list logo