[U-Boot] WTF (Re: [MailServer Notification]Web Reputation Notification)

Please Blacklist all mails from this domain "sypris.com" Thanks, AWG ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] ARM: fix build error with gcc-4.4.2 about inline function declared weak

Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Tom, > > In message <4af33815.4030...@windriver.com> you wrote: > >>>> Signed-off-by: Abdoulaye Walsimou Gaye >>>> >>> What is this? Are you sure this patch is properly attributed? Was >>> A

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: fix build error with gcc-4.4.2 about inline function declared weak

Tom wrote: > What is your > $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc -v > ? > Tom > This is a home made toolchain. With same options with gcc-4.3.4, gcc-4.4.1, no build error. armel-linux-gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: armel-unknown-linux-gnueabi Configured with: /usr/src/walsimou/embtoolkit-

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: fix build error with gcc-4.4.2 about inline function declared weak

From: Abdoulaye Walsimou Gaye This patch fix build error with gcc-4.4.2 about inline function declared weak, see below: board.c:96: error: inline function 'coloured_LED_init' cannot be declared weak board.c:98: error: inline function 'red_LED_on' cannot be declared wea

Re: [U-Boot] lowlevel_init.s for ARM920t/S3C2410

> > Alternatively, I have seen some unofficial u-boot ports for s3c24x0 cpu's that > do support u-boot booting from NAND flash but I don't have the source code > for them. > Kevin, I think this[1] is the code you are talking about. I just give it a try and it works like a charm when booting fro

Re: [U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-samsung/master

Tom Rix a écrit : > Minkyu Kang wrote: > >> Dear Tom, >> >> The following changes since commit 617da90c1dcf65428ddfb63fef897439950bc915: >> Tom Rix (1): >> Merge branch 't-next-marvell' into t-next-at91 >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> >> git://git.denx.de/u-boot-sams

Re: [U-Boot] ARM pull request v3

Tom Rix a écrit : > Wolfgang, > > I have cleaned up the commits to arm/master-sync. > > The cleanup is from doing a > git rev-list --reverse master..arm/master > Then working back from my notes to take only the commits > were either misc arm or other arm pull requests. > These were cherry picked on

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH-ARM 1/4, v2] Clean-up of cpu_arm920t and cpu_arm920t_s3c24x0 code

09-September/060111.html, > no comments as yet > - [U-Boot] [PATCH-ARM 3/4, v2] Clean-up of s3c24x0 drivers excluding nand > driver, http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-September/061583.html, > one comment by Gaye Abdoulaye Walsimou, fixed in v2 > - [U-Boot] [PATC

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH-ARM 4/4] Clean-up of s3c24x0 nand driver

Wolfgang Denk a écrit : > Dear Scott Wood, > > In message <20090911222349.ga26...@b07421-ec1.am.freescale.net> you wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 12:15:22AM +0100, >> kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk wrote: >> >>> This patch re-formats the arm920t s3c24x0 nand driver in preparati

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH-ARM 3/4] Clean-up of s3c24x0 drivers excluding nand driver

Kevin, This email seems to contain twice the same patch. Cheers, ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] boot linux data aboot for S3C2440A

fluke56512 wrote: > mini2440 is not cheap for a student in my country. > 2009-09-05 > > I just want to say sorry for this mistake Cheers, ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] boot linux data aboot for S3C2440A

fluke56512 a écrit : > what is wrong with me. > > [u-b...@s3c2440a]# nand read 0x30008000 0x0004 0x0020 > NAND read: device 0 offset 0x4, size 0x20 > 2097152 bytes read: OK > Hello fluke56512, IIRC board with S3C2440A does not exist in the official versions of u-boot. Few attem

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: compiler options cleanup - improve tool chain support

lp!! > > Note 3: Most ARM systems also define this: > PLATFORM_RELFLAGS +=$(call cc-option,-mshort-load-bytes,$(call > cc-option,-malignment-traps,)) > I guess this can be unified and moved to lib_arm/config.mk, too, but I > would like to handle this in a separate, later patch. This makes > testing (and bisecting) easier, and it is a non-critical problem. > > Tested-by: Gaye Abdoulaye Walsimou ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: compiler options cleanup - improve tool chain support

Dear Wolfgang Denk, I tested your patch against 7dedefdf749ff02c1086f7ddb8cb83a77b00d030 (latest revision at the moment of writing of u-boot.git). My toolchain is a home-made toolchain and contains gcc-4.4.1, binutils-2.19.1, eglibc-2.10.1, kernel headers 2.6.30.4, configured to generate binaries f

Re: [U-Boot] "raise" not defined, when compiler uses its own div0

Ulf Samuelsson wrote: > When trying to build U-Boot under Buildroot and OpenEmbedded, > I run into a problem: > > When linking u-boot the linker seems to use the div0 from > the C compiler libgcc instead of the u-boot div0. > Yes i had the same problem with a home made toolchain (eglibc-2.10, g

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH-ARM] Add support for Embest SBC2440-II Board 1/7

Hello list and Kevin, What about all these patches, did they apply with head? I have a s3c2440 based board and will be happy to test them. Thanks ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot