> Bill,
>
> On 06/30/2011 04:54 PM, William C. Landolina wrote:
> > I start with Atmel's vanilla first stage boot from NAND. I have a
> > much hacked SDCard boot that works as well and that is where I want to
> > head. My target systems do not have NAND or Dataf
> Bill,
>
> On 06/30/2011 02:10 PM, William C. Landolina wrote:
> > Alex - If there is anything I can do to help please let me know. I've been
> roughly patching the various builds for a while and really would like to see
> this get back in the mainline.
>
> I
I need the AT91SAM9G45 port - if I need to bring it up to date to keep it
among the living I will volunteer, but if one of the usual AT91 maintainers is
already working on it I suspect they can do it more easily than I.
I can start work on the 9G45 update in early July if necessary.
Thanks,
Fatls prints negative numbers for file sizes larger than 2GiB because the
format statements where dentptr->size are referenced all use %ld rather than
%lu formats. There appear to be four places in fs/fat.c where this occurs.
- Bill.
___
U-Boot mailin
> Dear William C. Landolina,
>> UB-X1> mmcinfo
>> mci: setting clock 260416 Hz, block size 512
>> mci: setting clock 260416 Hz, block size 512
>> mci: setting clock 260416 Hz, block size 512
>> gen_atmel_mci: CMDR 1048 ( 8) ARGR 01aa (SR: 0c100025)
Reinhard - FYI, your 2010.09-rc1 SD/MMC patches work on an Atmel 9G45
evaluation kit. I customized the board and configuration files following the
directions in README.atmel_mci and everything works as expected. I included
the console output from a test boot below in case there is some informa
Running U-Boot from the SDCard on an Atmel 9G20 is certainly doable. I have
recently booted U-Boot and Linux from an SDCard on an Atmel AT91SAM9G45-EKES
with no other non-volatile memories and the process is the same with some minor
limitations.
The process I used:
1. SAM Boot loader loads "
What is the status of this patch for getting MCI working on SAM9 CPUs? I am
working on a new AT91SAM9G45 board and would like to incorporate it if it is
ready for prime time. It is not clear to me who should be signing off on this
patch and if they have done so.
If there is work to be done on
> -Original Message-
> From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On
> Behalf Of Albin Tonnerre
> Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 12:49 PM
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] RTC value corruption on QIL-A9G20 startup
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 0
9 matches
Mail list logo
