Re: [U-Boot] [u-boot-release] [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: verify the localbus device tree address before booting the OS

2011-11-16 Thread Swarthout Edward L-SWARTHOU
> ... it's possible for the 'reg' property to be wrong. Instead of all this, why doesn't u-boot just fix it? I have the same annoyance with ccsrbar. U-boot controls the ccsrbar address via a user configured #define. So instead of having different dts's based on the u-boot ccsrbar, why can't u-bo

Re: [U-Boot] Problem with PCI Express connecting 2 MPC8544

2011-07-25 Thread Swarthout Edward L-SWARTHOU
From: sardamaxima > > In the first processor (configured as RC) I get the following ... > ...PCIE LTSSM=0x16, Negotiated link width=1 Good. >Scanning PCI bus 01 > PCIE1 on bus 00 - 01 ... > In the second processor (configured as EP) I get the > following output: > " >

Re: [U-Boot] PCIe Configuration on MPC8544 processor

2011-06-21 Thread Swarthout Edward L-SWARTHOU
From: António Silva > > I am trying to activate a PCIe link between two MPC8544 > processor's on a custom board. > One processor is configured as Root Complex > (cfg_host_agt[0:2] = '111') and > the other processor as endpoint (cfg_host_agt[0:2] = '101'). I've done this with many different conf

Re: [U-Boot] user-space ===>> U-Boot ====>> user-space ?

2010-10-12 Thread Swarthout Edward L-SWARTHOU
From: bosmith > > ... > The use-case is to have two kernel images, two root file > systems, and to let a user-space application specify which to > use and then force a reboot. The system will not lose power > during this reboot. > > This seems like a common enough problem. Has anyone solved

Re: [U-Boot] Question about PCIe configuration

2010-10-07 Thread Swarthout Edward L-SWARTHOU
From: Carlos Roberto Moratelli > > Rigth! I just enabled CONFIG_PCIE1 flag and the PCIE1 bus is detected. > Now I have this new log: > > > PCIE1 connected to Slot1 as Root Complex (base address ffe0a000) > Outbound memory range: f800:1 PCICSRBAR @ 0xf7f0 R0 > bus_start: 0

Re: [U-Boot] Question about PCIe configuration

2010-10-06 Thread Swarthout Edward L-SWARTHOU
From: Carlos Roberto Moratelli > > I am trying to map a PCIe peripherical on my MPC8536 custom board. > The peripherical is on PCIe1 port. Is this still an issue? >pci_init_board: devdisr=40900, sdrs2_io_sel=7, io_sel=7 > Serdes2 disalbed That is fine. > PCIE3: disabled > > P

Re: [U-Boot] 8/16 bit support for NAND at runtime

2010-03-22 Thread Swarthout Edward L-SWARTHOU
From: Wolfgang Denk > > Dear Vipin KUMAR, > > In message <4b908bc8.9030...@st.com> you wrote: > > > > > Why would that be needed? Do you really expect to see > > > both types of interfaces on the same piece of hardware? > > > > Yes, that's precisely the case with Spear SoC. It has an FSMC > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Testing netconsole fix

2010-01-28 Thread Swarthout Edward L-SWARTHOU
From: Peter Tyser > Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 12:44 PM > > This *seemed* to work, but I'm probably overlooking something obvious. > The other thing this patch doesn't do is ever shut down an interface, > eg prior to booting an OS. I'm also not sure how it would work if > using multiple i

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] Patch status update

2010-01-25 Thread Swarthout Edward L-SWARTHOU
From: Kumar Gala > > On Jan 25, 2010, at 4:44 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > > here is a list of e-mail messages / patches, which I have marked as > > "open" in my folder. It would we be really helpful if both submitters > > and responsible custodians could take a look at these and provide > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc/85xx: Fix bug in setup_mp code

2010-01-21 Thread Swarthout Edward L-SWARTHOU
From: Kumar Gala > Its possible that we try and copy the boot page code out of flash into > a DDR location that doesn't have a TLB cover it. For example, if we > have 3G of DDR we typically only map the first 2G. In the cases of > 4G+ this wasn't an issue since the reset page TLB mapping cove

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc85xx, mpc86xx: Fix gd->cpu pointer after relocation

2009-12-15 Thread Swarthout Edward L-SWARTHOU
From: Kumar Gala [mailto:ga...@kernel.crashing.org] > On Dec 15, 2009, at 12:10 PM, Peter Tyser wrote: > > > The gd->cpu pointer is set to an address located in flash when the > > probecpu() function is called while U-Boot is executing from flash. > > This pointer needs to be updated to point to

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] nfs: NfsTimeout() updates

2009-12-07 Thread Swarthout Edward L-SWARTHOU
From: Peter Tyser > Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 8:09 PM > Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] nfs: NfsTimeout() updates Tested on MPC8527DS. Tested by: Ed Swarthout ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/13] ppc: Fix relocation

2009-10-12 Thread Swarthout Edward L-SWARTHOU
From: Peter Tyser > >> From: Edward >> >> This patch fixes it: >> >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/48103 >> >> I still get this crash with latest head (u-boot >> 2009.08-00338-gcd77dd1). > > Thanks Ed, > To clarify, you're saying that the patch linked above > just

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/13] ppc: Fix relocation

2009-10-12 Thread Swarthout Edward L-SWARTHOU
From: Edward > Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 11:05 AM > To: Wolfgang Denk; Peter Tyser > > With -m relocatable, x86emu crashes because the op codes > tables are forced to GOT2 section: > > Video: ATI Radeon video card (1002, 5b60) found @(6:0:0) > videoboot: Booting PCI video card bus 6, fu

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/13] ppc: Fix relocation

2009-09-24 Thread Swarthout Edward L-SWARTHOU
From: Wolfgang Denk > > All patches applied to "reloc" branch. Thanks for all this work. With -m relocatable, x86emu crashes because the op codes tables are forced to GOT2 section: Video: ATI Radeon video card (1002, 5b60) found @(6:0:0) videoboot: Booting PCI video card bus 6, function 0, devic

Re: [U-Boot] U-boot level MPC8548 Ethernet internal/External Loop backtesting

2009-02-17 Thread Swarthout Edward L-SWARTHOU
From: Ajeesh Kumar > > We have a custom board with MPC8548E processor, please help > me in suggesting/sharing Ethernet Internal/External Loopback > testing code piece. Also any Phy level loop back too. If you have a typical phy and this commit applied, you can use the mii command to put the ph

[U-Boot] Image.c get_table_entry_name

2008-09-05 Thread Swarthout Edward L-SWARTHOU
The string pointers in uimage_{arch,os,type,comp}[] are not being relocated and still point to flash. If flash is erased (all f's), this causes bootm to trap on a bad pointer. This is for powerpc (mpc8572ds). How are they suppose to be relocated? -EdS => boot boot ## Booting kernel from Legacy