ichel
> wrote:
> > From: Rick Bronson
> >
> > Allow higher UART baud rates for communications to ACHC at 13.5 MBaud
>
> What does ACHC mean?
ACHC is an product acronym, probably should change that sentence to:
Allow higher UART baud rates for communications up t
Hi Kever and Simon,
Thanks very much for the help. Really appreciate it.
> I didn't see your detail steps for getting u-boot-dtb.bin, does it
> include SPL here?
I'm using this method:
> 2. with "CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_SPL_BACK_TO_BROM", which is default setting
...
> I'm confusing with this inc
Hi All,
I updated one of my two RK3288 boards (Viewsonic) with newer Android
factory firmware (using Windows) and now it won't boot mainline u-boot
when I use the same exact recipe that worked previously:
sudo ${UPGD} db rkbin/rk32/rk3288_boot.bin
sudo ${UPGD} wl 0x40 tftpboot/u-boot-dtb.bin
Hi Simon,
I'm not sure what to do about (in drivers/power/regulator/rk808.c):
static const struct rk808_reg_info rk808_ldo[] = {
{ 100, 10, LDO1_ON_VSEL, 5, },
...
I had to change this table as my LDO values are different for this
board. I'd like to fix it to take values fro
Hi Simon,
>
> On 9 December 2016 at 18:12, Rick Bronson wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > How do I enable a particular regulator upon boot? I have two
> > identically set LDO entries:
> >
> > vccio_en: LDO_REG1 {
> >
Hi All,
How do I enable a particular regulator upon boot? I have two
identically set LDO entries:
vccio_en: LDO_REG1 {
regulator-always-on;
regulator-boot-on;
regulator-min-m
Hi Heiko,
Thanks again for the help.
Been testing the RK3288 Ethernet and it works pretty good. One
thing I was wondering about was that I seemed to have to have:
CONFIG_NET_RANDOM_ETHADDR=y
or I get:
Error: ethernet@ff29 address not set.
Is there a better way?
Another issue w
Hi Heiko,
Thanks very much for the link. I got it, went to the branch,
applied my patches from main denx u-boot and got it to work!
The only odd thing is, I have to do this:
regulator dev vcc_lan
regulator enable
Or else I can't use the networking.
When I boot up I see:
=> regulator
Hi Heiko,
> I'm currently testing Simon's network patches and this option works
> quite nicely.
Speaking of networking, I noticed that rk3288 networking is not quite
merged yet. I would very much like to have networking so if you could
point me to any rk3288 networking patches, I'd appreciate
=> md 0xFF79 4
ff79: ....
=>
> Hi Rick,
>
> On 29 November 2016 at 11:22, Rick Bronson wrote:
> > Hi Heiko and Simon,
> >
> > Thank you both for your help, I really appreciate it.
> >
Makefile is here if you are so inclined:
http://members.efn.org/~rick/pub/Makefile See the targets u-boot-denx
and uboot_new_flash to see what I've tried.
>
> From he...@sntech.de Tue Nov 29 08:45:02 2016
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: Simon Glass , Rick Bronson ,
"eddie.cai" ,
li
into the resource file and then again at the end of the
kernel via CONFIG_ARM_APPENDED_DTB. Do I need both? When I do both
I get things like:
Unknow param: MACHINE_MODEL:rk30sdk!
Unknow param: MACHINE_ID:007!
Thanks much for any help.
Rick Br
Hi All,
I've got nsupported RK3288 hardware running the latest git u-boot to SPL
as explained in
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=blob;f=doc/README.rockchip. My goal
is to run the mainline (ie. not Android) Linux kernel on this hardware
and wondered:
- Do I need to get the latest git u-boot
Hi Reinhard,
Okay, it may be awhile before I get to this... Kinda busy at the
moment.
Cheers,
Rick
> Dear Rick Bronson,
>
> Am 03.08.2011 18:10, schrieb Rick Bronson:
> > Hi Reinhard,
> >
> > Did you ever get the email below? I never heard back from any
Hi Reinhard,
Did you ever get the email below? I never heard back from anyone on
this.
Cheers,
Rick
>From rick Tue Jan 18 22:32:15 -0800 2011
To: Reinhard Meyer
CC: alb...@aribaud.net, reinhard.me...@emk-elektronik.de
In-reply-to: <4d34a61f.1030...@emk-elektronik.de> (message from Reinh
vailable hardware?
>
> Sandeep,
> can you please, take a look at this?
>
> [1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/76803/
>
>
> On 06/16/11 22:52, Rick Bronson wrote:
> > Hi Igor,
> >
> > Yes, I have tested this on the AM3715 but not on any other parts.
&
Hi Igor,
Yes, I have tested this on the AM3715 but not on any other parts.
Cheers,
Rick
> On 05/17/11 00:52, r...@efn.org wrote:
>
> > Signed-off-by: Rick Bronson
> > ---
> > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/timer.c |2 +-
> > 1 files changed
Hi Alexander,
But I need to be able to do it right inside u-boot. That is, I want
to run USBNET within u-boot itself and not the kernel.
Thanks,
Rick
> Am 25.02.2011 00:06, schrieb Rick Bronson:
> >I've searched the mailing list archives and couldn't come up with
Hi All,
I've searched the mailing list archives and couldn't come up with an
answer so I thought I'd try here: Anyone know of any implementations
of USBNET in u-boot for OMAP? This feature allows the OMAP, as a USB
device (gadget), to do networking over a USB connection with a USB
host.
Than
Hi,
The good news is that MX51 Eval board Rev 2.5, CPU Rev 3 Ethernet is
working. The bad news is that it's not based on the latest u-boot
git. Hopefully that will change soon.
Here's how to get it going:
wget ftp://ftp.denx.de/pub/u-boot/u-boot-2009.08.tar.bz2
wget http://www.efn.org/~ric
Hi Stefano,
Not sure if this will help, but here is my startup with
#define DEBUG
in drivers/net/fec_mxc.c
http://www.efn.org/~rick/pub/minicom.cap
Rick
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
> You must take a look at the reason. However, I see a recent commit for
> this file that changed SYSCTL_CLOCK_MASK, as I did, too. Because I
> changed (in the same way) this mask, the patch cannot directly applied.
> However, you can easy fix it adding the defines I needed.
> There are still comme
> You cannot expect that patch works if you runs the previous ones with
> dry-run and the current patch modifies files already patched in the
> previous ones.
Very true ;-)
Number 10 still fails :(
/u-boot> cat ~/tlc/dqp1130/u-boot.imx51.10.patch | patch -p1
patching file cpu/arm_cortexa8/mx
Hi Stefano,
With
git clone git://git.denx.de/u-boot
I get:
/u-boot> cat ~/tlc/dqp1130/u-boot.imx51.1.patch | patch -p1 --dry-run ERROR
patching file Makefile
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] ^C
/u-boot> cat ~/tlc/dqp1130/u-boot.imx51.2.patch | patch -p1 --dr
Hi Stefano,
> You do not find at the moment mx51 support on the u-boot mainline. I
> sent my patches to u-boot ML with the goal to integrate the processor in
> u-boot and the patches are currently under review. If you want to give
> theses patches a try, you have to apply them to the current u-bo
Hi Stefano,
> Please send your questions to u-boot ML. It is the right place where we
> can exchange experience on u-boot.
Okay.
> If this is the u-boot you find in the ltib, the command could be
> correct. It depends how u-boot is built.
>
> The MX51 processor reads automatically the SD card
26 matches
Mail list logo