Hello,
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 06:44:12PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 12:20:01AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:09:10 -0500
> > > From: Tom Rini
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 11:42:56PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > > > Date: Wed, 21 De
Hello,
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 07:45:28PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 at 11:16, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 06:56:44PM +0600, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> >
> > > add external lwIP library as a git submodule.
> > > Use STABLE-2_2_0_RELEASE tag.
> > >
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 01:01:01PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> When debugging, one sometimes only gets partial output lines or
> nothing at all from the last printf, because the uart has a largish
> buffer, and the code after the printf() may cause the CPU to hang
> before the uart IP
follow suit in the am33xx code.
then there is the question what point is there in having a return value
in this function at all.
Anyway, it's fine to not check the return value in the caller if there
is no use for the error.
Reviewed-by: Michal Suchánek
>
> Do not cause the
Hello,
On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 08:31:56PM +0200, Massimo Pegorer wrote:
> Hi Harry,
>
> Il giorno lun 7 ago 2023 alle ore 11:02 Harry Waschkeit <
> harry.waschk...@conplement.de> ha scritto:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a RaspberryPi 4 where on one USB port a Sierra Wireless LTE
> > module (EM7455)
Hello,
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 06:49:57PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 at 11:03, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >
> > On 7/17/23 09:42, Michal Suchánek wrote:
...
> > > More generally, what is the overall vision for these functio
Hello,
On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 05:53:24PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> This function only ever returns 0, but may not assign the second
> parameter. Same thing for device_find_next_child(). Do not assign
> ret to stop proliferation of this misuse.
>
> Reported-by: Jonas Karlman
> Signed-off-by: M
On Sat, Mar 04, 2023 at 01:58:17PM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
> On 2/20/23 04:39, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 11:59:36PM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
> >> Do not return both NULL and error pointers. The function is only
> >> documented
On Sat, Mar 04, 2023 at 01:54:12PM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
> On 2/20/23 13:42, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 10:57:17AM -0500, Sean Anderson wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2/20/23 05:46, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at
On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 10:57:17AM -0500, Sean Anderson wrote:
>
> On 2/20/23 05:46, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 11:59:34PM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
> > > Some clk uclass functions, such as devm_clk_get() and clk_get_parent(),
> > > re
Hello,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 11:08:41AM -0500, Sean Anderson wrote:
> On 2/20/23 05:37, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 11:59:35PM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
> > > log_ret() cannot work with unsigned values, and the assignm
return -ENODEV;
>
> - ops = clk_dev_ops(pclk->dev);
> - if (!ops->get_rate)
> - return -ENOSYS;
> -
> /* Read the 'rate' if not already set or if proper flag set*/
> if (!pclk->rate || IS_ERR_VALUE(pclk->rate) ||
> pclk->flags & CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE)
Reviewed-by: Michal Suchánek
Thanks
Michal
On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 11:59:34PM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
> Some clk uclass functions, such as devm_clk_get() and clk_get_parent(),
> return error pointers. clk_valid() should not consider these pointers
> to be valid.
>
> Fixes: 8a1661f20e6c ("drivers: clk: Handle gracefully NULL pointers")
if (!pclk->rate || IS_ERR_VALUE(pclk->rate) ||
> + pclk->flags & CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE)
> pclk->rate = clk_get_rate(pclk);
>
> return pclk->rate;
With the current code that randomly returns one or the other this is the
correct thing to do.
Reviewed-by: Michal Suchánek
Thanks
Michal
On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 11:59:36PM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
> Do not return both NULL and error pointers. The function is only
> documented as returning error pointers.
>
> Fixes: 8a1661f20e6c ("drivers: clk: Handle gracefully NULL pointers")
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland
> ---
>
> driver
Hello,
On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 11:59:35PM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
> log_ret() cannot work with unsigned values, and the assignment to 'ret'
> incorrectly truncates the rate from long to int.
>
> Fixes: 5c5992cb90cf ("clk: Add debugging for return values")
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland
> -
Hello,
On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 06:45:36PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 02:50:16PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 08:11:34PM +0100, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 01:25:50PM -0500,
Hello,
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 01:25:50PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 07:24:25PM +0100, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 08:54:55AM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 02:00:12PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > > > It is r
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 05:01:12PM +0100, Filip Žaludek wrote:
>
>
> Hi Michal,
>
> thanks for testing! Do you consider keyboard as working once it is detected
> without
> 'usb_kbd usb_kbd: Timeout poll on interrupt endpoint', or judging from
> subsequent
> typing? Note that issue is
Hello,
On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 01:49:47PM +0100, Filip Žaludek wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
> change seems to be unfriendly to RPi3B+, it allows to enter 'U-Boot>' shell
> but usb keyboard
> does not respond. Keyboard is detected by 'usb info' in v2023.01-rc3, not in
> v2022.10.
> When reverted, usb k
Hello,
On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 06:00:13PM +0800, Kever Yang wrote:
> Hi Quentin,
>
> I would prefer you to remove SPL_ATF_NO_PLATFORM_PARAM in those boards
> you have test,
then we will have no end of this problem.
>
> there may have some boards using legacy ATF binary but still want to us
On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 09:56:29AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 10/23/22 09:50, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 11:52:29PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Am 22. Oktober 2022 2
On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 11:52:29PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
>
> Am 22. Oktober 2022 23:22:01 MESZ schrieb Michal Suchanek :
> >SANDBOX_BITS_PER_LONG is the number of bits in long on the sandbox
> >platform.
>
> Please, explain in the commit message what this patch is good for.
For se
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 06:05:51PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2022 at 01:28, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 15, 2022 at 10:27:43PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > On 10/15/22 21:46, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > H
On Sat, Oct 15, 2022 at 10:27:43PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 10/15/22 21:46, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Heinrich,
> >
> > On Sat, 15 Oct 2022 at 13:29, Heinrich Schuchardt
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Am 15. Oktober 2022 21:24:36 MESZ schrieb Simon Glass :
> > > > Hi Heinric
> > On 10/16/22 10:40, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 10/16/22 16:19, Sean Anderson wrote:
> > > > > > On 10/16/22 07:46, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > &g
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 10:34:29PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> k210 is 64bit but the driver and tests are also built in sandbox, and
> that can be built 32bit.
>
> BIT(32) does not work on 32bit, shift before subtraction to fit into
> 32bit integer with BIT values.
Also see
https://patchwork
On Sat, Oct 15, 2022 at 09:05:53PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 10/15/22 20:39, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Heinrich,
> >
> > On Sat, 15 Oct 2022 at 12:31, Heinrich Schuchardt
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 10/15/22 19:53, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > Hi Michal,
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 14 Oct
Hello,
On Sat, Oct 15, 2022 at 10:39:19AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> To test the watchdog system reset we need to disable the default sandbox
> system reset.
>
> The following settings provide the reset command via watchdog on the
> sandbox:
>
> CONFIG_WDT_GPIO=n
> CONFIG_WDT_SA
On Sat, Oct 15, 2022 at 06:54:02AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 10/14/22 22:52, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > Currently sandbox configuration defautls to 64bit and there is no
> > automation for building 32bit sandbox on 32bit hosts.
> >
> > Use _LP64 macro as heuristic for detecting 64bit
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 01:33:33PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 10/14/22 10:33, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 08:40:52AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > From: Heinrich Schuchardt
> > >
> >
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 05:05:26AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 10/13/22 22:28, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > Currently sandbox configuration defautls to 64bit and there is no
> > automation for building 32bit sandbox on 32bit hosts.
> >
> > cpp does not know about target specification, cod
Hello,
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 08:40:52AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> From: Heinrich Schuchardt
>
> Building sandbox_defconfig on 32bit systems requires manual configuration.
> we should void this.
>
> The compiler provides symbol __LP64__. This is enough to know if the host
> is a 64bi
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 10:16:56AM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> In file included from ../tools/imagetool.h:24,
> from ../tools/default_image.c:16:
> In function ‘image_set_name’,
> inlined from ‘image_set_header’ at ../tools/default_image.c:133:2:
> ../include/image.h:786:9:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 09:29:22AM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 12/10/2022 21.47, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > In file included from ../tools/imagetool.h:24,
> > from ../tools/default_image.c:16:
> > In function ‘image_set_name’,
> > inlined from ‘image_set_header’ at ../t
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 09:49:20PM +0200, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 07:10:40PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Michal,
> >
> > On Sun, 2 Oct 2022 at 13:34, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 04:00:26AM -060
On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 07:10:40PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On Sun, 2 Oct 2022 at 13:34, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 04:00:26AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi Michal,
> > >
> > > On Su
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 04:00:26AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On Sun, 25 Sept 2022 at 02:28, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> >
> > The description claims that the device is probed but it isn't.
> >
> > Add the device_probe() call.
> >
> > Also consolidate the iteration into one function.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 04:00:32AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On Tue, 27 Sept 2022 at 15:38, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> >
> > bootdev_list() uses uclass_*_device_err() to iterate devices.
> > However, the only value _err adds is returning an error when the device
> > pointer is null
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 04:00:42AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Sept 2022 at 15:38, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> >
> > There are a few commands that iterate uclass with
> > uclass_first_device/uclass_next_device or the _err variant.
> >
> > Use the _check class iterator variant to ge
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 10:26:35AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Sep 2022, Kever Yang wrote:
>
> > Hi Lee Jones,
> >
> > On 2022/9/8 15:44, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Thu, 11 Aug 2022, Lee Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > > This set fixes several issues found on the Rock Pi 4.
> > > >
> > > > For
On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 08:15:31AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On Sat, 24 Sept 2022 at 14:10, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 07:04:25PM +0200, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
&g
Hello,
On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 07:04:25PM +0200, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 09:02:53AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Michal,
> >
> > On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 11:44, Simon Glass wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Michal,
>
Hello,
On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 09:02:53AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 11:44, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > Hi Michal,
> >
> > On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 01:39, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> >
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 08:36:23PM +0800, Kever Yang wrote:
> Hi Quentin,
>
> I don't think we need to add regulators_enable_boot_on/off callback in
> SPL framework,
>
> the rk3399-puma/Qseven is the only board need to do this in the SPL right
> now.
>
> The hardware design for S
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 12:08:32PM +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On 8/30/22 12:11, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 12:01:55PM +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> > > Hi Michal,
> > >
> > > On 8/25/22 08:49, Michal
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 09:15:12PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 at 10:48, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 09:56:52AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi Michal,
> > >
> > > On T
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 09:56:52AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 at 04:23, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 07:52:27PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi Michal,
> > >
> > > On F
On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 07:52:27PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 at 14:23, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> >
> > When probing a device fails NULL pointer is returned, and other devices
> > cannot be iterated. Skip to next device on error instead.
> >
> > Fixes: 6494d708b
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 09:01:08AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 at 23:51, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> >
> > In some situations it may be needed to pass parameters to sudo or to use
> > a different tool to gain root access. Add SUDO variable to specify the
> > sudo t
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 12:01:55PM +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On 8/25/22 08:49, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > The coverage tool name varies across distributions.
> >
> > Add COVERAGE variable to specify the tool name.
> >
> > Also there is one place where prefix is prepended to t
Hello,
On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 08:27:05AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 8/4/22 22:30, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Michal,
> >
> > On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 at 13:42, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 01:22:53PM -060
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 11:49:53AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 at 02:28, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> >
> > When probing a device fails NULL pointer is returned, and other devices
> > cannot be iterated. Skip to next device on error instead.
> >
> > Fixes: 6494d708b
-by: YouMin Chen
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones
> Tested-by: Xavier Drudis Ferran
Also does not cause any regression on a Pinebook Pro
Tested-by: Michal Suchánek
Thanks
Michal
> Reviewed-by: Kever Yang
> ---
> drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3399.c | 36 +
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 05:17:56PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > I guess you are new to the netdev list :-)
> > >
> > > This is one of those FAQ sort of things, discussed every
> > > year. Anything like this is always NACKed. I don't see why this time
> > > should be any different.
> > >
> > >
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 03:11:48AM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > Is something like the following really that crazy of an idea?
> > diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> > index e0878a500aa9..a679c74a63c6 100644
> > --- a/net/core/dev.c
> > +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> > @@ -1151,6 +1151,15 @@ st
On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 02:38:35PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 23:09:45 +0200
> Michal Suchánek wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 03:57:55PM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
> > > Hi Tim,
> > >
> > > On 8/8/22 3:18
On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 03:57:55PM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> On 8/8/22 3:18 PM, Tim Harvey wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I'm trying to understand if there is any implication of 'ethernet'
> > aliases in Linux such as:
> > aliases {
> > ethernet0 = &eqos;
>
On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 01:26:23PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On Sat, 6 Aug 2022 at 13:54, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 06, 2022 at 12:21:29PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi Michal,
> > >
> > > On
https://www.rockchip.fr/Rockchip%20RK3399%20TRM%20V1.4%20Part1.pdf
>
> Link: [2] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=305766
>
> Signed-off-by: Xavier Drudis Ferran
The incorrect clock settings trigger an assert and prevent the board
from booting when clock debuggin
On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 04:28:33PM +0200, Xavier Drudis Ferran wrote:
> El Sun, Aug 07, 2022 at 04:44:04PM +0200, Michal Suchánek deia:
> > Hello,
> >
> > when compiled with clock debug rk3399 cannot be booted because memory
> > setup code triggers clock assertion:
On Sun, Aug 07, 2022 at 08:31:56PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 7, 2022 at 8:14 PM Michal Suchánek wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > when compiled with clock debug rk3399 cannot be booted because memory
> > setup code triggers clock assertion:
> >
&
Hello,
when compiled with clock debug rk3399 cannot be booted because memory
setup code triggers clock assertion:
U-Boot TPL 2022.07-00038-g61e11a8e9f-dirty (Aug 07 2022 - 16:13:17)
TPL PLL at ff76: fbdiv=50, refdiv=1, postdiv1=2, postdiv2=1, vco=120
khz, output=60 khz
TPL PLL at ff7
On Sat, Aug 06, 2022 at 12:21:29PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On Fri, 5 Aug 2022 at 14:07, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 10:48:26AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi Michal,
> > >
> > > On
On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 10:48:26AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On Fri, 5 Aug 2022 at 05:32, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> >
> > When the sysreset is added as child of the pmic the pmic is probed
> > before relocation. That probe fails, and subsequent attempts to probe
> > after reloacti
On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 01:22:53PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 at 11:58, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> >
> > Explain when devices should get activated.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek
> > ---
> > doc/develop/driver-model/design.rst | 22 --
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 01:22:57PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 at 11:59, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> >
> > When probing a device fails NULL pointer is returned, and other devices
> > cannot be iterated. Skip to next device on error instead.
> >
> > Fixes: 64
Hello,
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 10:42:36AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 at 11:32, Chris Morgan wrote:
> >
> > From: Chris Morgan
> >
> > This reverts commit ad607512f5757f4485968efd5bcf2c0245a8a235.
> >
> > It was found during extensive testing that this causes p
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 05:37:18PM -0500, Chris Morgan wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 03:39:43PM +0200, Jan Palus wrote:
> > u-boot 2022.07 successfully finds and loads kernel (5.18.3) on my
> > Pinebook Pro however boot process fails when loading rk808 module:
> >
> > rk3x-i2c ff3c000
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 03:14:33PM +0200, Xavier Drudis Ferran wrote:
> El Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 01:00:03PM +0200, Michal Suchánek deia:
>
> > mmc@fe31: 3
> > mmc@fe32: 1 (SD)
> > mmc@fe33: 0 (eMMC)
> >
> > This is not consistent with any of the
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 03:01:25PM +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On 7/18/22 13:00, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 11:09:56AM +0200, Xavier Drudis Ferran wrote:
> > > El Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 10:33:18AM +0200, Quentin Schulz
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 11:09:56AM +0200, Xavier Drudis Ferran wrote:
> El Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 10:33:18AM +0200, Quentin Schulz deia:
> > Hi Xavier,
> >
> > On 7/15/22 18:30, Xavier Drudis Ferran wrote:
> > > Spi0 is not needed in SPL and SPL could be a little smaller without it,
> > > but then t
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 10:33:18AM +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> Hi Xavier,
>
> On 7/15/22 18:30, Xavier Drudis Ferran wrote:
> > Spi0 is not needed in SPL and SPL could be a little smaller without it,
> > but then the SF_DEFAULT_BOOT would have to be 0 to refer to spi1, and
> > that's confusing,
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 07:18:07PM +0200, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 12:10:47PM -0500, Chris Morgan wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 10:41:34AM +0200, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > this causes regression on
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 12:10:47PM -0500, Chris Morgan wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 10:41:34AM +0200, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > this causes regression on pinebook pro:
> >
> > resetting ...
> > System reset not supported on this plat
read error
Trying to boot from SPI
Trying to boot from MMC2
Sending CMD16
Sending CMD17
mmc_load_image_raw_sector: mmc block read error
SPL: failed to boot from all boot devices
### ERROR ### Please RESET the board ###
On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 01:59:15PM +0200, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> He
Hello,
this causes regression on pinebook pro:
resetting ...
System reset not supported on this platform
### ERROR ### Please RESET the board ###
Is there something missing in the DT for this board?
Or perhaps a fallback should be provided in absence of the PMIC?
Thanks
Michal
On Fri, May 27
On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 06:26:22PM -0500, Samuel Holland wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On 7/3/22 2:20 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > many ARM SoCs have a mask rom feature that provides interface for
> > downloading firmware over USB.
> >
> > Downstream rockchip u-boot has 'brom' or
On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 11:22:51PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jul 2022 21:20:20 +0200
> Michal Suchanek wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > many ARM SoCs have a mask rom feature that provides interface for
> > downloading firmware over USB.
> >
> > Downstream rockchip u-boot has 'brom' or 'rbro
Hello,
On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 11:23:26PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jul 2022 21:20:22 +0200
> Michal Suchanek wrote:
>
> Hi Michal,
>
> > p-boot uses RTC GPR 1 value 0xb0010fe1 to flag FEL boot on A64
> >
> > Default to the same.
>
> Please don't add any more #ifdef's to U-Boo
Hello,
after rebooting rk3399 Pinebook Pro mmc1 is no longer accessible from
u-boot, and video is not working, only cold boot works.
This is not a problem anymore when Linux is loaded from another device.
Any idea how to debug this?
Thanks
Michal
U-Boot TPL 2022.07-rc5 (May 16 2022 - 12:00:00
Hello,
On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 09:40:00PM +1100, Anthony Davies wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am having an issue where it seems after u-boot has booted an EFI it
> doesnt seem to "release" the serial console input.
>
> I have had this happen using the iPXE efi similar to
> https://lists.denx.de/piperma
Hello,
I would suggest to use --thread with format-patch when sending patches.
Thanks
Michal
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 03:35:01PM +0800, Weijie Gao wrote:
> This series will add support for MediaTek MT7620 SoC with two reference boards
> and related drivers.
>
> The MediaTek MT7620 is a 2x2 802.
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 10:35:30PM +0200, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When I enable SPI support I do not get a SPI bus.
>
> Config:
> --- a/configs/orangepi_zero_defconfig
> +++ b/configs/orangepi_zero_defconfig
> @@ -11,3 +11,21 @@ CONFIG_CONSOLE_MUX=
Hello,
When I enable SPI support I do not get a SPI bus.
Config:
--- a/configs/orangepi_zero_defconfig
+++ b/configs/orangepi_zero_defconfig
@@ -11,3 +11,21 @@ CONFIG_CONSOLE_MUX=y
CONFIG_SUN8I_EMAC=y
CONFIG_USB_EHCI_HCD=y
CONFIG_USB_OHCI_HCD=y
+CONFIG_SPI=y
+CONFIG_DM_SPI=y
+CONFIG_DM_SPI_FLA
On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 23:11:44 +0200
Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 8/23/19 10:41 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/musb/musb_hcd.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Can you squash this to [4/5] or do you want to respin
On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 06:28:01 +0200
Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 7/12/19 4:24 PM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 06:05:45 +0200
> > Marek Vasut wrote:
> >
> >> On 7/10/19 5:47 PM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 5 Jul 20
On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 06:05:45 +0200
Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 7/10/19 5:47 PM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Jul 2019 14:12:36 +0200
> > Marek Vasut wrote:
> >
> >> On 7/5/19 12:44 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> >>> Causes unbound key repeat on
On Fri, 5 Jul 2019 14:13:50 +0200
Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 7/5/19 12:44 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > Variant of the int_msg wrapper that does not introduce excessive retry
> > delay on error.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek
> > ---
> > v2: usb_submit_int_msg -> usb_int_msg
> > ---
> >
On Fri, 5 Jul 2019 21:51:43 +0800
Bin Meng wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 6:44 PM Michal Suchanek wrote:
> >
> > This aligns naming with usb_bulk_msg and usb_control_msg.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek
> > ---
> > v2: new patch
> > ---
> > common/usb.c | 2 +-
> > common/usb_kbd.c
On Fri, 5 Jul 2019 14:12:36 +0200
Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 7/5/19 12:44 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > Causes unbound key repeat on error otherwise.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek
> > ---
> > v2: fix indentation
>
> What changed in V3 ?
>
> > ---
> > common/usb_kbd.c | 7 +++
> >
On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 21:05:26 +0200
Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 7/4/19 8:54 PM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 18:19:20 +0200
> > Marek Vasut wrote:
> >
> >> On 7/4/19 6:00 PM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2 Jul 20
On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 18:19:20 +0200
Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 7/4/19 6:00 PM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 23:20:52 +0200
> > Marek Vasut wrote:
> >
> >> On 7/2/19 9:35 PM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2 Jul 20
On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 09:39:10 +0800
Bin Meng wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 1:57 AM Michal Suchanek wrote:
> >
> > Use the wrapper because the unwrapped function prototype will be changed
> > in the following patch.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek
> > ---
> > v2: usb_submit_int_msg -> usb
On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 23:20:52 +0200
Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 7/2/19 9:35 PM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 20:41:04 +0200
> > Marek Vasut wrote:
> >
> >> On 7/2/19 7:55 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> >>
> >> Commit message is stil
On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 13:48:00 +0200
Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 7/3/19 1:43 PM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 13:26:50 +0200
> > Marek Vasut wrote:
> >
> >> On 7/3/19 11:46 AM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2 Jul 20
On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 13:26:50 +0200
Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 7/3/19 11:46 AM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 23:20:28 +0200
> > Marek Vasut wrote:
> >
> >> On 7/2/19 9:31 PM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2 Jul 20
On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 23:20:28 +0200
Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 7/2/19 9:31 PM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 20:38:27 +0200
> > Marek Vasut wrote:
> >
> >> On 7/2/19 7:50 PM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2 Jul 20
On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 09:37:42 +0800
Bin Meng wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 1:57 AM Michal Suchanek wrote:
> >
> > On error the data buffer does not contain valid data so do not submit it
> > for processing. Usually it will contain the last data recieved so the
> > last pressed ke
On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 20:41:04 +0200
Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 7/2/19 7:55 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>
> Commit message is still missing ...
>
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek
> [...]
It says "usb: sl811-hcd: return -ENOTSUPP from unimplemented
submit_int_msg"
Thanks
Michal
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
