Re: [U-Boot] [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 1/3] arm: sunxi: Allow per-platform DRAM ZQ configuration on sun8i

2019-03-14 Thread Julian Calaby
default 14779 if MACH_SUN8I_V3S > default 3881979 if MACH_SUN8I_R40 || MACH_SUN50I_H6 Would it work if these were just re-ordered so the more specific ones come first? Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.cal...@gmail.com Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.

Re: [U-Boot] [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 1/8] usb: musb-new: Fix improper musb host pointer

2018-07-17 Thread Julian Calaby
Hi, Sorry, please ignore this, I didn't realise this patch was for u-boot. On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:45 PM Julian Calaby wrote: > > Hi Jagan, > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 5:17 AM Jagan Teki wrote: > > > > When MUSB is operating in peripheral mode, probe re

Re: [U-Boot] [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 1/8] usb: musb-new: Fix improper musb host pointer

2018-07-17 Thread Julian Calaby
*musbp = musb_init_controller(plat, (struct device *)bdata, ctl_regs); > if (!*musbp) { > printf("Failed to init the controller\n"); > - return -EIO; > + return NULL; > } > > - return 0; > + return

Re: [U-Boot] [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/3] sunxi: sun8i-emac: Update DT bindings

2018-01-31 Thread Julian Calaby
Hi Maxime, On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 7:36 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi Julian, > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 07:29:13PM +1100, Julian Calaby wrote: >> Hi Maxime, >> >> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 7:21 PM, Maxime Ripard >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > &

Re: [U-Boot] [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/3] sunxi: sun8i-emac: Update DT bindings

2018-01-31 Thread Julian Calaby
special need, they can always disable the MMC env and >> enable stuff at their likings, it's just the standard "make >> .._defconfig; make" process that needs to be fixed with some band-aids >> for now. > > I really don't want to go down the "let's fix each defconfig when we > find out it broke", this is very likely to be broken with no-one > noticing. > > Is this issue happening when you sync the whole DT, and would it break > if you just convert the EMAC binding? > > Otherwise, we might try to revive the DTC garbage collection of unused > nodes patches. This would prevent us from using the overlays on such a > DT, but that doesn't like like an unfair tradeoff. Stupid question: As I understand it, the boot process is SPL => Full U-Boot => Linux. Would it therefore be possible to use a cut-down DT for the SPL (just the bits it cares about) then use a full one afterwards? I'm guessing that the SPL wants to patch the DT we pass to Linux, would we be able to handle that using overlays? Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.cal...@gmail.com Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/ ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 1/2] sunxi: twi: enable clocks on sun7i

2015-12-03 Thread Julian Calaby
MACH_SUN7I > + if (port > 4) > +#else > if (port > 2) > +#endif Should the number here be a #define somewhere, or even a parameter for each version of this clock? Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.cal...@gmail.com Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julia

Re: [U-Boot] [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 1/2] sunxi: twi: enable clocks on sun7i

2015-12-03 Thread Julian Calaby
Hi Oliver, On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Julian Calaby wrote: > Hi Oliver, > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 3:49 AM, Olliver Schinagl wrote: >> From: Olliver Schinagl >> >> Commit 6c739c5d added code to enable i2c bus 4 and 5 on the sun7i SoC >> but forgot to

Re: [U-Boot] [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 3/6] sunxi: Add the R8 DTSI

2015-09-18 Thread Julian Calaby
>>> >>> This is in essence a partial sync with the kernel tree wrt the dts >>> files, so no SPDX tags. >> >> >> Really? I'd have sworn that we were doing that even on kernel files, > > > I don't know. I'm fine either way, but

Re: [U-Boot] [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 5/9] sun4i: Rename dram files to dram_sun4i.x

2014-11-04 Thread Julian Calaby
_ZDONE (1 << 31) /* ZQ calibration completion flag */ > - > -#define DRAM_IOCR_ODT_EN(n) n) & 0x3) << 30) | ((n) & 0x3) << 0) > -#define DRAM_IOCR_ODT_EN_MASK DRAM_IOCR_ODT_EN(0x3) > - > -#define DRAM_MR_BURST_LENGTH(n) (((n) & 0x7) << 0) > -#define

Re: [U-Boot] [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 0/3] ARM: sunxi: Fix reset support on sun6i/sun8i

2014-10-05 Thread Julian Calaby
Hi, On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 1:12 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 11:02 PM, Julian Calaby > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 10:37 PM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> This series fixes support for th

Re: [U-Boot] [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 0/3] ARM: sunxi: Fix reset support on sun6i/sun8i

2014-10-05 Thread Julian Calaby
Doesn't this break building multi-sub-arch kernels that support both sun4i/sun5i/sun7i and sun6i/sun8i? Would it be possible to just add a new driver for the modified watchdog or put all the bits that changed into the device tree? Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.cal...@

Re: [U-Boot] [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/2] sunxi: Use Thumb2 and move stack to gain more SRAM space in FEL mode

2014-07-24 Thread Julian Calaby
ory > on github). Stupid question: why isn't this on the wiki? Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.cal...@gmail.com Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/ .Plan: http://sites.google.com/site/juliancalaby/ ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/2] sunxi: Use Thumb2 and move stack to gain more SRAM space in FEL mode

2014-07-24 Thread Julian Calaby
Hi, On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Julian Calaby wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Siarhei Siamashka > wrote: >> On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 19:31:45 +0100 >> Ian Campbell wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 20:09 +0300, Siarhe