Hi Oliver, On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Julian Calaby <julian.cal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Oliver, > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 3:49 AM, Olliver Schinagl <oli...@schinagl.nl> wrote: >> From: Olliver Schinagl <o.schin...@ultimaker.com> >> >> Commit 6c739c5d added code to enable i2c bus 4 and 5 on the sun7i SoC >> but forgot to enable the clocks for these 2 i2c busses. >> >> This patch enables the clocks for i2c bus 4 and 5 on sun7i. >> >> Signed-off-by: Olliver Schinagl <o.schin...@ultimaker.com> >> --- >> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/clock_sun4i.c | 4 ++++ >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/clock_sun4i.c >> b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/clock_sun4i.c >> index 7c8eff9..ed910b1 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/clock_sun4i.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/clock_sun4i.c >> @@ -67,7 +67,11 @@ int clock_twi_onoff(int port, int state) >> struct sunxi_ccm_reg *const ccm = >> (struct sunxi_ccm_reg *)SUNXI_CCM_BASE; >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_MACH_SUN7I >> + if (port > 4) >> +#else >> if (port > 2) >> +#endif > > Should the number here be a #define somewhere, or even a parameter for > each version of this clock?
Wait, this is a u-boot patch, right? If so, ignore this and sorry for the noise. Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.cal...@gmail.com Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
