Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc: p1_p2_rdb_pc: rename to P2020RDB_PC

2016-07-19 Thread Bryan Hundven
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 2:50 PM, york sun wrote: > On 01/05/2016 01:57 PM, york@nxp.com wrote: >> On 01/05/2016 01:38 PM, York Sun wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 01/05/2016 10:40 AM, Bryan Hundven wrote: >>>> On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 09:01:17AM -0800, Yo

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc: p1_p2_rdb_pc: rename to P2020RDB_PC

2016-01-05 Thread Bryan Hundven
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 09:01:17AM -0800, York Sun wrote: > > > On 12/23/2015 07:40 AM, Bryan Hundven wrote: > > York, > > > > Just checking if you had seen this patch? > > > > Yes, I noticed. You rename P2020RDB to P2020RDB_PC. Do you have ano

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc: p1_p2_rdb_pc: rename to P2020RDB_PC

2015-12-23 Thread Bryan Hundven
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Sinan, List, On December 23, 2015 10:26:28 AM PST, Sinan Akman wrote: > > Hi Bryan > >On 23/12/15 10:40 AM, Bryan Hundven wrote: >> York, >> >> Just checking if you had seen this patch? >> >> Cheers, &g

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc: p1_p2_rdb_pc: rename to P2020RDB_PC

2015-12-23 Thread Bryan Hundven
York, Just checking if you had seen this patch? Cheers, -Bryan On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Bryan Hundven wrote: > As I work to re-add p1_p2_rdb, CONFIG_P2020RDB conflicts with > p1_p2_rdb's CONFIG_P2020RDB. > > Rename p1_p2_rdb_pc's CONFIG_P2020RDB to CONFIG_P2020

[U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc: p1_p2_rdb_pc: rename to P2020RDB_PC

2015-12-18 Thread Bryan Hundven
As I work to re-add p1_p2_rdb, CONFIG_P2020RDB conflicts with p1_p2_rdb's CONFIG_P2020RDB. Rename p1_p2_rdb_pc's CONFIG_P2020RDB to CONFIG_P2020RDB_PC. Signed-off-by: Bryan Hundven Cc: Andy Fleming Cc: York Sun --- board/freescale/p1_p2_rdb_pc/ddr.c | 2 +- config

[U-Boot] p1020rdb/p2020rdb-pa

2015-12-16 Thread Bryan Hundven
Hello, I was digging through my garage and found my freescale p1020rdb-pa board. I noticed in commit: http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=commit;h=743d48151d2df4215b90310dc422db84d45e8002 ...that these boards were removed because were not generic, and possibly no longer maintained by freescale.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/6] IXP: Make IXP compile with arm-linux-gnueabi- and fix it

2012-03-05 Thread Bryan Hundven
++ >  include/configs/actux3.h                 |    2 ++ >  include/configs/actux4.h                 |    2 ++ >  include/configs/dvlhost.h                |    2 ++ >  include/configs/pdnb3.h                  |    2 ++ >  20 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) > > Cc:

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot/IXP

2012-03-05 Thread Bryan Hundven
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Bryan Hundven, > >> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: >> > Dear Bryan Hundven, >> > >> >> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: >> >> > Dear M

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot/IXP

2012-03-05 Thread Bryan Hundven
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Bryan Hundven, > >> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: >> > Dear Michael Schwingen, >> > >> >> Am 03/05/2012 12:54 PM, schrieb Marek Vasut: >> >> > Dear Michael

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot/IXP

2012-03-05 Thread Bryan Hundven
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Michael Schwingen, > >> Am 03/05/2012 12:54 PM, schrieb Marek Vasut: >> > Dear Michael Schwingen, >> > >> >> On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 02:14:56AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: >> >>> Dear Michael Schwingen, >> >>> >> >>> do you still intend to m

Re: [U-Boot] toolchains toolchains toolchains

2011-11-18 Thread Bryan Hundven
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > if you're like me, getting toolchains known to work has always been > problematic for the arches you don't care about.  yes, there's the ELDK, but > that doesn't cover all the arches that u-boot supports, and imo, they're > "fatter" than ne

[U-Boot] ubifs on p1_p2_rdb issue

2011-07-08 Thread Bryan Hundven
I would like to use my nor as a raw flash, but I would like ubi/ubifs on my nand. I have both a custom p1020 and p2020 board, and I have the p1020rdb and p2020rdb eval boards. I tried to add ubifs support on 2011.06: 8<-- diff --

Re: [U-Boot] P1011RDB & P1020RDB: NAND bootstrap too big

2010-09-03 Thread Bryan Hundven
es. I also know that there are updates to the current factory. Let me build a new one and compare the output and see what happens. -Bryan From: Kumar Gala [ga...@kernel.crashing.org] Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 9:29 AM To: Bryan Hundven Cc: u-boot@lis

Re: [U-Boot] P1011RDB & P1020RDB: NAND bootstrap too big

2010-09-03 Thread Bryan Hundven
Ah. Ok. Thanks Kumar, I will get with timesys. From: Kumar Gala [ga...@kernel.crashing.org] Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 7:25 AM To: Bryan Hundven Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [U-Boot] P1011RDB & P1020RDB: NAND bootstrap too big > >

Re: [U-Boot] P1011RDB & P1020RDB: NAND bootstrap too big

2010-09-02 Thread Bryan Hundven
This was a git clone from today. Built with a pretty standard e500v2 gnuspe timesys toolchain. I was able to build and run P1020RDB_config on the freescale demo board. --- From: Bryan Hundven Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 2:42 PM

[U-Boot] P1011RDB & P1020RDB: NAND bootstrap too big

2010-09-02 Thread Bryan Hundven
When I build either P1011RDB_NAND_config or P1020RDB_NAND_config, I get: make[1]: Entering directory `/home/bryan/Source/u-boot/nand_spl/board/freescale/p1_p2_rdb' /opt/WG/ppc-linux26-glibc211/bin/ppc-gcc -D__ASSEMBLY__ -g -Os -mrelocatable -fPIC -meabi -D__KERNEL__ -DTEXT_BASE=0xfff0