Giulio wrote…
Perfect, I suggest you to test it on a EVK before than going with your
custom board if you can, and after port your board, that should make it
easier.
I certainly will do! One supplementary question… what did you use U-Boot
to boot? I’m looking to get uClinux running on it. As a
Giulio wrote...
Is there a preferred / recommended toolchain for building U-Boot for the
i.MX RT10xx platforms or should any recent ARM cross compiler work?
It should compile fine with any recent ARM cross-compiler.
Please let me know if it builds correctly
I used the arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc v10
Hi Giulio,
Is there a preferred / recommended toolchain for building U-Boot for the
i.MX RT10xx platforms or should any recent ARM cross compiler work?
-Andy.
JH wrote...
gpmi-nand:1m(boot),1m(ubootenv),-(storage)
The saveenv does not take any parameters, how did it work to write to
the NAND 1m(ubootenv)?
=> saveenv
Saving Environment to NAND... Erasing NAND...
Erasing at 0x5e -- 100% complete.
Writing to NAND... OK
It looks like that saveen
JH wrote...
I added NAND and UBIFS support to my Yocto layer machine config file:
UBOOT_CONFIG = "nand"
UBOOT_CONFIG[nand] += "mx6ull_14x14_evk_config"
UBOOT_CONFIG[nand] += "mx6ull_14x14_evk_nand_config"
UBOOT_CONFIG[nand] += "ubi"
UBOOT_CONFIG[nand] += "ubifs"
But my u-boot.imx-nand still c
Hello!
Does anyone know if U-Boot for the Microchip (Atmel) SAMA5D2x devices
supports the Falcon (SPL -> Linux) boot mode?
-Andy.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
Robert wrote...
i'd never thought about it so, as a quick check, i just tried this
to see how many board files actually lived directly under
board// and got:
$ ls board/*/board.c
board/sunxi/board.c
$
i thought that was interesting -- all of one board
For most boards the primary source
Fabio wrote...
$ /bin/sh --version
/bin/sh: 0: Illegal option --
In my system /bin/sh points to bash:
$ ls -al /bin/sh
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 mai 2 2018 /bin/sh -> dash
Just to pick up on the obvious… /bin/sh is showing as linked to dash not
bash!
Using (( … )) for arithmetic expansion i
Michael wrote...
I have an awkward situation, short of it is we have a custom i.MX53
board, the nk.nb0 and eboot.nb0 files to boot into windows (with no
source code), and an Ubuntu VM with the source code and compiled files
of uboot from august 2009 (as well as some flavour of linux that I'm
Joe wrote...
Apologies in advance if this is answered somewhere else, but I had no
luck finding information about it.
I'm moving from an older version of u-boot (2016) to a current one.
Some of the patches I had against the old uboot included work in the
hwmon subdirectory. These patches now
Wenyou wrote...
> On 2017/7/31 14:57, Wenyou Yang wrote:
> > The SAMA5D27-SOM1-EK board embeds a SAMA5D27 SOM1 module, which includes
> > a SAMA5D27-SiP chip and QSPI flash, Phy and MAC EEPROM. The SAMA5D27 SiP
> > integrates the SAMA5D2 with 1Gbit DDR2-SDRAM in a single package.
> > It is based o
Hello Wenyou,
We are looking at using one of the SAMA5D2 family in an upcoming design and
I have a couple of questions...
In a recent U-Boot patch set you mentioned the SAMA5D27 SOM1 SiP module. Is
this something that is available yet as I can't find it on the Microchip
website?
If we choose to
Heiko wrote...
> > Thanks for the answer, I figured out what the problem is, in the fact I
> > was using a zImage, using an uImage format solve the problem :-)
> > It should maybe added to the documentation ;-)
>
> Patches are welcome!
I don't know that part of the code well enough to know wheth
Ayoub wrote...
> => run args_mmc
> => run loadimage
> 8942296 bytes read in 610 ms (14 MiB/s)
> => run loadfdt
> 58129 bytes read in 56 ms (1013.7 KiB/s)
> => spl export fdt ${loadaddr} - ${fdtaddr}
I have AM335x Falcon mode running with SPI flash (albeit an old 2014.xx U-Boot
version) and the c
Wenyou Yang wrote...
> The purpose of patch set is to convert the board to support device
> tree and driver model, and enable the early debug UART as well.
> It is based on the patch set:
> [PATCH v8 0/2] pinctrl: at91: Add pinctrl driver
> https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2017-M
Simon wrote...
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288-board-spl.c b/arch/arm/mach-
> rockchip/rk3288-board-spl.c
> index e51e19bb2d..f494843663 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288-board-spl.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288-board-spl.c
> @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ void board_init_f(u
Hello,
I am working on an update to a Linux configuration for a custom TI DM355
based hardware platform which uses a Micron MT29F4G08ABADAWP NAND flash
device and U-Boot 2013.07 (which I can't change). The boards have been
deployed in the field over a number of years using the NAND flash to store
Hi Tom,
> So, git commit 6761946f is what removed the board in question. Now,
> looking in mainline today (and also looking at 6761946f) I see that we
> had and have support for CONFIG_TARGET_OMAPL138_LCDK and that uses SPL
> which is a prerequisite for falcon mode. So there's nothing too low
>
Hello TI experts,
I appreciate that all of the TI DM355 support long since (August 2015)
landed in the great board scrap yard in the sky or wherever it is git
chooses to hide it!
I may have an upcoming project to reduce boot time on a pre-existing custom
platform using the DM355 and wondered if a
the .rom file for
Galileo with the latest master, so:
Tested-by: Andy Pont
Regards,
Andy.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Hi Bin,
> Please check http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/511333/ which should
> fix this issue.
The compilation of the .rom file for Galileo now succeeds with the application
of this patch. Not sure this is the official and proper way to do it but:
Tested-by: Andy Pont
Regards,
Hello,
Following the latest merges to the Master branch the ROM build now appears
to fail on Galileo (built with gcc v4.8.4).
The build output terminates with:
OBJCOPY u-boot.srec
OBJCOPY u-boot.bin
OBJCOPY u-boot-x86-16bit.bin
CAT u-boot-dtb.bin
IFDTOOL u-boot.rom
U-Boot image ove
Wolfgang wrote...
{snip}
> 2. For some time now, we provide not only the classic FTP server for
>download of the U-Boot release tarballs, but also a public
>directory in the Amazon Cloud Drive [1]. The ACD is supposed to
>provide much better connectivity (especially for non-european
Vignesh wrote...
[snip]
> +#define BIT(x) (1 << (x))
> +
Is this not something that would be better in a global header file somewhere
rather than it starting a trend of a per-driver, per-arch, etc. definitions?
Andy.
Hi Bin,
> I just found u-boot.rom created from u-boot-x86/testing branch does
> not have working network any more on QEMU. It is working on the
> u-boot-x86/master branch.
>
> => set serverip 10.10.0.100;set ipaddr 10.10.0.108;set netmask
> 255.255.255.0;set gatewayip 10.10.0.100
> => run ramboo
Hello,
[snip]
> >> #ifndef CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE
> >> -#define CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE 0x1780
> >> #endif
Doesn't this also leave an empty, and therefore meaningless #ifndef...#endif
that could be removed completely?
Regards,
Andy.
___
U-Boo
Hi Gabriel,
>
> soc_gpio_s5_0@0 {
> gpio-offset = <0x80 0>;
> pad-offset = <0x1d0>;
> mode-gpio;
> output-value = <0>;
> direction = ;
> };
>
> soc_gpio_s5_1@0 {
> gpio-offset = <0x80 1>;
>
Hi Bin,
> BTW, so you are working on this board?
> http://www.siliconmotion.com/EW_Pages/Osprey.html
> Looks like a quark based board with graphics support! Are you planning
> to submit patches to enable it?
It is indeed for one of those boards, as an off-radar task to get my head back
into x86
Hi Bin,
> > It is using the standard version of gcc that comes as part of the
> > CentOS 6.6 installation which is 4.4.7.
> >
>
> I have been using 4.6.1 and 4.7.2, and both work. Can you please try
> some newer gcc?
Good call. Having found a gcc version 4.8.4 then it has all compiled
success
Hi Bin,
> >> Can you post your full configuration here?
> >
> > I have attached the autoconf.mk and U-Boot .config files. Hopefully they
> > tell you what you need.
> >
>
> Looks OK. What gcc version are you using? It seems that your compiler
> does not understand the macro DOWNTO8 and DOWNTO16
Hi Simon,
> >> I am using xterm, not sure if this helps.
> >>
> >> $ echo $TERM
> >> xterm
> >
> > That is what I have too. I guess it might be down to the way
> SecureCRT is interpreting what it is being sent rather than the Linux
> machine itself.
>
> You might be able to set that terminal pro
Hi Bin,
> Can you post your full configuration here?
I have attached the autoconf.mk and U-Boot .config files. Hopefully they tell
you what you need.
> > Also, if anyone can tell me what $TERM setting I need to get the rogue "b"
> > characters to actually display bold/bright then that would be
Hello,
I am trying to create a configuration for the Silicon Motion Osprey board
which is a Quark SoC and their SM750 graphics controller.
I have cloned the Intel Galileo files and changed them accordingly and have
defined the options for the VBIOS for the graphics controller but when I try
to co
Hi Bin,
> + "pci": IRQ routing is controlled by PCI configuraiton registers
^^^
One small typo to correct.
Andy.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/li
Hi David,
> for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> /* wait till TX register is empty (TXS == 1) */
> + start = get_timer(0);
> while (!(readl(&ds->regs->channel[ds->slave.cs].chstat) &
>OMAP3_MCSPI_CHSTAT_TXS)) {
> -
Dev wrote...
> I am new to U-boot development. We are using U-Boot 1.1.4 on a MIPS
> 74Kc QCA 9557 processor, which is running Linux Kernel 2.6.32.27.
Is there a reason why you have to be running a kernel from 2010 and a
version of bootloader that is even older? It makes life much easier to
pro
Hello,
The documentation [1] for the AM335x defines a manual process for UART
booting as including the steps...
When '' appear select XMODEM -> Send "u-boot-spl.bin", and then...
When '' appear select YMODEM -> Send "u-boot.img"
Is there a pre-existing tool or script around that will au
Hi Nikita,
> CONFIG_EXYNOS_PWM_BL
> CONFIG_L5F31188
> CONFIG_SED156X
> CONFIG_VIDEO_COREBOOT
> CONFIG_VIDEO_IMX25LCDC
> CONFIG_VIDEO_SED13806
> CONFIG_VIDEO_SMI_LYNXEM
> CONFIG_AM335X_LCD
I believe that Hannes Petermaier recently posted some board updates that use
the CONFIG_AM335X_LCD option and
Hello (and a belated happy new year to all),
I am working on a custom hardware platform where I need to pull the Linux
kernel from a Spansion SPI NOR flash device connected to a 600MHz TI AM3354
processor. The McSPI is configured to run at its maximum speed with a 48MHz
clock and the datasheet fo
Hi Tom,
> I suspect that this might be related to the general problem on these
> part families where SPL isn't as fast as we expect it to be, perhaps
> cache related.
I did a bit of digging around following this line of thought and found an
old discussion on the mailing list
(http://lists.denx.de
Hi Tom,
Following the experiment that yielded the following results:
> U-Boot> time sf read ${loadaddr} 0x20 ${loadsize}
>
> I get the following back:
>
> SF: 2541352 bytes @ 0x20 Read: OK
> time: 2.447 seconds
I have done some reading and poking around and have added the
OMAP3_MCSPI_C
Hi Tom,
> eMMC is likely to be faster, yes. You may also want to see what can be
> trimmed from the kernel binary, in either case, and if going with an
> uncompressed kernel ends up being quicker.
There are I think two issues going on here one with decompression time
which, as you say, I can res
Hi Tom,
> How big is the args file? We default to placing the args at 0x8800
> in ti_am335x_common.h (see CONFIG_SYS_SPL_ARGS_ADDR) to make sure that
> we don't have an overlap between the DT and the kernel which is quite
> possible with a reasonably sized DT and placing it at 0x8100.
Ch
Hi Tom,
> So first, take a look at drivers/mtd/spi/spi_spl_load.c as that's what
> will be doing falcon mode work on your SPI flash.
>
> Second, take a look at board/ti/am335x/README, you're looking for the
> lines that read like:
> Using Device Tree in place at 80f8, end 80f85928
I have man
Hello,
I am currently setting up the Falcon mode support for a custom AM3354 based
platform that has U-Boot and the Linux kernel in an SPI NOR flash.
Following the instructions I have loaded the kernel to ${loadaddr} and
device tree to ${fdtaddr} from the SPI flash device and then have run:
U-Bo
Hello,
Is there, or is anyone working on, code for controlling the write protect
pin of SPI flash devices using a GPIO? In effect an "sf protect "
command? I have had a look in 2014.07 which is on the platform we are using
but can't see anything.
Thanks,
Andy.
Hi Simon (and Bin),
> I've applied the remaining x86 patches to u-boot-x86. It runs on
> chromebook_link (Pixel) with support for most hardware relevant to a
> boot loader: SDRAM, SPI, PCI, USB (and USB Ethernet), SATA (internal
> 32GB SSD), SD card, LCD, UART, keyboard, EC.
>
> Bin this should b
Hello Mugunthan,
> There is no relation between pinmux and phy attached to the slave.
> Is your cpsw slave structures are populated with proper phy ids?
Thanks for giving me the steer on this. I hadn't updated the slave
structure. Having updated the slave structure it is now correctly detecting
Hello,
I am working on porting U-Boot 2014.07 to a custom TI AM3354 based hardware
platform and am confused trying to set the pin mux for the two Ethernet
interfaces that are on the board.
RGMII1_ pins are connected to an ATHEROS AR8031 PHY (PHY ADDR 04) and the
pins GPMC_A0 .. GPMC_A11 are con
Hello,
I am trying to build U-Boot SPL (2014.07) for a custom TI AM3354 based board
with MMC support. Mostly I have cloned the settings from the am335x_evm.h
config file but am getting linker errors with SPL...
common/spl/built-in.o: In function `spl_register_fat_device':
.../common/spl/spl_fat.
This isn't strictly a U-Boot issue but I am hoping that there are
appropriately knowledgeable people here who will be able to help!
I am working on a Linux driver for an I2C RTC device and need to add the
correct definitions into the device tree for the SAMA5D31 to be passed to
the kernel at boot
Hello Rene,
> Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 2/3] usb: eth: add ASIX AX88179 DRIVER
>
> changes in v3:
> -added all compatible devices from linux driver
> -fixed issues from review
>
> changes in v2:
> -added usb_ether.h to change list
> -added 2nd patch to enable driver
Hello Heiko,
> > What says flinfo ? It seems you have protected sectors on
> > your nor flash ... you must unprotect them before using it ...
>
> flinfo says that all sectors are read only as the flash device supports
> block locking and powers up with all sectors in their locked state.
>
> The
Hello Heiko,
> What says flinfo ? It seems you have protected sectors on
> your nor flash ... you must unprotect them before using it ...
flinfo says that all sectors are read only as the flash device supports
block locking and powers up with all sectors in their locked state.
The board configur
Hello Heiko,
> > UBI error: vtbl_check: reserved_pebs 81, ubi->good_peb_count 80
> > UBI error: vtbl_check: too large reserved_pebs, good PEBs 80
> >
> > Use of UBI is new to me so where are the PEBs configured?
>
> Good question ... looking into vtbl_check(), the "reserved_pebs" value
> is read
Hello Heiko,
> Hmm.. I thought to see something like this:
>
> "too large reserved_pebs %d, good PEBs %d"
>
> I am not familiar with this HW ... I think, you have to debug into it
Changing the dbg_err() to ubi_err() and also adding a bit more output then I
get:
UBI error: vtbl_check: reserved_
Hello Heiko,
> > Using the patches from Bo Shen to support the NOR flash on the Atmel
>
> which patches?
I can't find the references in Patchman but they were sent to the mailing
list on 18th July 2014 in a series called "ARM: atmel: sama5d3xek: enable
NOR flash support". The patches basically
Hello,
Using the patches from Bo Shen to support the NOR flash on the Atmel
SAMA5D31EK hardware platform I am trying to get a UBI root file system
within the NOR flash, at offset 0x1000 in the memory map, to work but
get errors from the "ubi part" command using U-Boot 2014.04:
U-Boot> mtdpart
Hello,
I am doing some work with the TI AM3358 Starter Kit and a Spansion S25FL164K
SPI NOR flash.
Trying both U-Boot 2013.10, which ships with the TI kit, and 2014.04 I have
made the changes to board configuration file to enable SPI0 and disable I2C1
in the board pin mux, have included Spansion
Hello,
I am working on a port of U-Boot to a custom hardware platform based on the
TI AM3354. According to the schematics from the hardware design company,
the AM3354 has a 4bit MMC interface (MMC0) which has been connected to a uSD
card connector.
There is a second interface (8bit) connected to
Hello,
Does Falcon boot mode only support raw NAND devices as described in the
README.falcon file will it also work with SPI NOR devices and eMMC NAND, SDC
card as well?
Thanks,
Andy.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/
Hello!
We are currently working on the specification for a project using the TI
AM335x where the overall system boot time has to be reduced as far as
possible. In order to achieve that I am proposing that we implement a board
specific spl_start_uboot() function which under normal circumstances U-
Hi Bo,
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_CMD_FLASH
> >> +#define CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_CFI
> >> +#define CONFIG_FLASH_CFI_DRIVER
> >> +#define CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_BASE 0x1000
> >> +#define CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_SECT 0x2
Is this the correct value for CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_SECT? Shouldn't it be
127 (i
Hi Bo,
> -/* No NOR flash */
> +/* NOR flash */
> +#define CONFIG_CMD_FLASH
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CMD_FLASH
> +#define CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_CFI
> +#define CONFIG_FLASH_CFI_DRIVER
> +#define CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_BASE0x1000
> +#define CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_SECT0x2
> +#define CONFIG
Hi Bo,
> I think you should check more detail in section 12 "Standard Boot
> Strategies". It needs more things to do. I will give a picture in
> following answer.
>
> As the code execute on NOR flash, so, the SPL configure the CPU clock
> will cause SMC access abortion. So, a brief guide as fol
Hello!
I am currently working on an implementation of NOR boot support for the
Atmel SAMA5D31-EK reference platform as a precursor to a custom hardware
platform. When tested and working I will push the support back to the
community but what I have at the moment doesn't appear to do anything so I
Hello Stefan,
I am looking at porting U-Boot to a board that is being designed with a
Micron PC28D00AP30 NOR flash device and can't work out whether this is
something that is already supported by U-Boot or whether it is work that I
will need to undertake.
I have had a good grep through the code
Wolfgang wrote...
> > A revised version of the spec (sorry, I would have used reply-to but
> > something went amiss with gmail and I've lost the original)
>
> http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/ToolsPatchTracking updated.
I have been and had a look at the specification that you have posted and am
Marek wrote loads of stuff then wrote...
> But then, how shall we go about it? Any python gurus around?
I wouldn't class myself as a "guru" as that should be a title that is
bestowed on you by others but I know a fair amount of Python and might be
able to have a go at implementing some of this st
Hi Graeme,
> Graeme Russ (5):
> x86: Fix compilation on 64-built built machines
Shouldn't this be 64-bit build machines?
Regards,
Andy.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Gary wrote...
> I'm trying to update U-boot on my board from v2011.06 to v2011.12
> It's an OMAP 3530, much like the BeagleBoard, with SMSC911x networking.
So not a BeagleBoard then but something different.
Is the board you are using one of the boards supported in the mainline
U-Boot tree or i
Hi Simon,
> >> arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc5xxx/usb_ohci.c | 79
> >> --
> arch/powerpc/cpu/ppc4xx/usb_ohci.c |
> >> 81 -- arch/powerpc/lib/board.c
> The two PowerPC ones apparently only happen with the 4.4 toolchain, so
> I think we
David wrote...
> I have a Freescale MPC8313E and want to boot with u.-boot 1.3.0 (there is no
> newer version avaiable, see also other thread).
Version 1.3.0 is only a month away from celebrating its 4th birthday and it is
highly unlikely that anyone here has the inclination to support it.
Ha
Angelo wrote...
> > > U-Boot 1.1.6 (May 27 2011 - 00:09:24)
> >
> > I suggest that you have two options:
> >
> > 1. Create a time machine and set it for November 2006 when 1.1.6 was
> > current.
> >
> > 2. Try the latest code base for U-Boot. :-)
>
> the "current" sourceforge link of u-boot o
Hello Angelo,
> U-Boot 1.1.6 (May 27 2011 - 00:09:24)
I suggest that you have two options:
1. Create a time machine and set it for November 2006 when 1.1.6 was
current.
2. Try the latest code base for U-Boot. :-)
Andy.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Bo
Hi Wolfgang,
> this is a * W A R N I N G * message to maintainers / users / owners
> of ARM boards. If your board fails to build in the current release,
> it will be subject to a big cleanup action which is going to remove
> all old, unmaintained and broken boards in the next merge window.
> Acco
Wolfgang wrote...
> - The cleanup after the reorganization of the ARM code has not been
> completed yet. At the moment, some 100+ RM boards are *broken* and
> *do not compile*.
Do you have an easily accessible list of these boards that are currently
still broken? If there is anything in the
Zvi wrote...
> On my next project, the target is Core2Duo (AMPRO's COM840).
>
> Is it a wise decision to use u-boot on this target ?
Probably not!
Ampro will already have invested a lot of time and effort in porting the
BIOS to that board and are giving you a device that works out of the box.
Michael wrote...
> > If they were rewritten to fit in with the ethos and licensing of U- Boot
is
> > it something that would be a worthwhile addition?
>
> I have rewritten them, but they are lack of same part. Physical, Virtual
mapping
> and parameter passing
Are you prepared to share them and I
Graeme wrote...
> > Did they get included and have subsequently been removed from U-Boot or
did
> > they never make it into the mainline code?
> >
>
> I doubt it. The fact that it used the GPL incompatible BSD license (the
one
> with 'obnoxious advertising' clause) probably didn't help ;)
If the
Hello!
Does anyone know what happened to the patches for loading and booting
Windows CE image suggested here:
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2008-August/039202.html
Did they get included and have subsequently been removed from U-Boot or did
they never make it into the mainline code?
Than
Loic wrote...
> diff --git a/common/cmd_usb.c b/common/cmd_usb.c
> index b04a8df..7fcc61a 100644
> --- a/common/cmd_usb.c
> +++ b/common/cmd_usb.c
> @@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ int do_usb(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc,
> char * const argv[])
> break;
>
Joakim wrote...
> Sure, but until freescale or someone else with eq. and motivation
> researches it, we are stuck. I am not sure anyone else has tried
> 83xx based boards yet. If someone has please report. Also
> include weather booted from NAND or NOR, CPU type(e300cX) and
> what reset vector is
Hi Graeme,
> One quick question - Since I am currently the only x86 developer, how do
> you want to handle the SOB + Ack'd for x86 patches? I feel that to date be
> applying my patches you have implied your own Ack'd By. Should I wait for
> you (or somebody else) to Ack them before I apply them to
Dear Wolfgang,
> > What version of host gcc is needed for building the tools such as
> > mkimage.exe? My embedded Linux development environment is Cygwin
(1.3.22)
> > based and includes gcc 3.4.4 which gives compiler errors for versions of
> > U-Boot 1.3.3 and later.
>
> Do you also get these er
Hello,
What version of host gcc is needed for building the tools such as
mkimage.exe? My embedded Linux development environment is Cygwin (1.3.22)
based and includes gcc 3.4.4 which gives compiler errors for versions of
U-Boot 1.3.3 and later.
make[1]: Entering directory
`/home/andy/bootloaders/
86 matches
Mail list logo
