The end-at-4gb property implies a value for skip-at-start so add it into
the output FDT so that U-Boot can read it.
Now that skip-at-start is implemented, we can drop the workarounds used
in the x86 code to obtain the correct image-pos value.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
arch/x86/cpu/intel_c
This value provides an offset for all image-pos values in the image.
Read it on startup so that we can take account of it when calculating
positions.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
lib/binman.c | 16 ++--
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/binman.c b/
With a recent Binman change, the skip-at-start property is now honoured,
meaning that all image-pos values in the affected section start from
the skip-at-start value.
The x86 code works around the old behaviour at present, so update it.
This fixes booting on coral
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
A recent series [1] adjusted how Binman handles the skip-at-start
property.
This first patch in this series fixes a bug in coral due to this change.
The remaining two patches remove work-arounds which are no-longer needed
on x86
[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=441782
On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 22:18:51 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Add empty weak assembler function armv8_switch_to_el2_prep() which is
> jumped to just before U-Boot determines which EL it is running in and
> decides which path to take to boot the Linux kernel. Add IH_TYPE_TFA_BL31
> into supported images
Hi,
I have managed to get output from the board using UART7 GPIO pins!
My USB-UART adapter is not reliable at 1.5M baud, therefore I had to reduce the
baudrate.
However while I get output from the board, my inputs are silently ignored, eg.
I can't type anything in the U-boot console. I suspect t
On 2/15/25 04:11, 1425075...@qq.com wrote:
From: Liya Huang <1425075...@qq.com>
Compiling with CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_DEBUG=y
without CONFIG_EFI_LOADER enabled will result in an
undefined reference to 'efi_add_memory_map_pg'.
Hello Liva,
Thank you for reporting the issue. It is reproducible w
Add empty weak assembler function armv8_switch_to_el2_prep() which is
jumped to just before U-Boot determines which EL it is running in and
decides which path to take to boot the Linux kernel. Add IH_TYPE_TFA_BL31
into supported images type, to allow implementation of board specific
U_BOOT_FIT_LOAD
On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 10:38:40 +0900, Hironori KIKUCHI wrote:
> Add support for SPI_3WIRE on soft_spi driver.
>
> v2:
> - Remove the wrong patch
> - Add `GPIOD_PULL_UP` to prevent the bus from floating
>
> Hironori KIKUCHI (1):
> spi: soft_spi: Add support for SPI_3WIRE
>
> [...]
A
On Tue, 04 Feb 2025 17:12:03 -0600, Tom Rini wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> A challenge we've run in to is making it easier for more people to use
> various python tools that we include in the tree. Part of the problem is
> that when we have a requirements.txt file, aside from the doc one we
> share with
On Wed, 05 Feb 2025 18:44:40 +0530, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> The CPSW3G instance of CPSW on AM62PX SoC provides Ethernet functionality.
> Currently, Ethernet is supported on Linux which runs on the A53 core on the
> SoC, by allocating all of the DMA resources associated with CPSW to A53_2.
>
On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 10:23:05AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 at 07:59, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 04:58:24AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 07:08, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 20
On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 10:24:50AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 at 08:01, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 05:11:45AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 at 05:06, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Tom,
> > > >
On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 10:24:08AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 at 07:46, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 05:06:42AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 at 12:18, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Dec 05, 20
сб, 15 лют. 2025 р. о 20:07 Simon Glass пише:
>
> Hi Svyatoslav,
>
> On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 at 10:42, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> >
> > сб, 15 лют. 2025 р. о 19:24 Simon Glass пише:
> > >
> > > Hi Svyatoslav,
> > >
> > > On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 at 08:52, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Add get_d
On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 10:21:16AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 at 07:41, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 04:59:40AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 09:25, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Feb 06, 20
сб, 15 лют. 2025 р. о 20:08 Simon Glass пише:
>
> Hi Svyatoslav,
>
> On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 at 10:55, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> >
> > Add a mostly complete list of ofnode analogs of of_graph
> > parsing helpers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel
> > ---
> > drivers/core/Makefile | 2
Hi Svyatoslav,
On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 at 10:55, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
>
> Add a mostly complete list of ofnode analogs of of_graph
> parsing helpers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel
> ---
> drivers/core/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/core/ofnode_graph.c | 217
Hi Svyatoslav,
On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 at 10:42, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
>
> сб, 15 лют. 2025 р. о 19:24 Simon Glass пише:
> >
> > Hi Svyatoslav,
> >
> > On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 at 08:52, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> > >
> > > Add get_display_timing ops for internal bridges linked to
> > > panels that do
Add a mostly complete list of ofnode analogs of of_graph
parsing helpers.
Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel
---
drivers/core/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/core/ofnode_graph.c | 217
include/dm/ofnode_graph.h | 90 +++
3 files changed, 308 inse
Add a mostly complete list of ofnode analogs of of_graph
parsing helpers.
Svyatoslav Ryhel (1):
core: ofnode: add of_graph parsing helpers
drivers/core/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/core/ofnode_graph.c | 217
include/dm/ofnode_graph.h | 90 +++
сб, 15 лют. 2025 р. о 19:24 Simon Glass пише:
>
> Hi Svyatoslav,
>
> On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 at 08:52, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> >
> > Add get_display_timing ops for internal bridges linked to
> > panels that do not support EDID (MIPI-DSI panels for example)
> > or have EDID not routed.
> >
> > Signe
On 2/14/25 06:12, Anshul Dalal wrote:
Hi all!
I was trying to implement falcon boot on TI AM62x EVM with the kernel image on
SD card's filesystem but the following check in `_spl_load` at
`include/spl_load.h:95` fails to -EIO as per the latest commit [89d]:
return read < spl_image->
Hi Svyatoslav,
On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 at 08:52, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
>
> Add get_display_timing ops for internal bridges linked to
> panels that do not support EDID (MIPI-DSI panels for example)
> or have EDID not routed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel
> ---
> drivers/video/bridge/video-br
Hi Tom,
On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 at 07:38, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 06:02:39AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Sat, 25 Jan 2025 at 16:01, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 03:56:02PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > Hi Tom,
> > > >
> > > > On Sat
Hi Tom,
On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 at 08:01, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 05:11:45AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 at 05:06, Simon Glass wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 06:59, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Feb 1
Hi Tom,
On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 at 07:46, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 05:06:42AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 at 12:18, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 07:35:39PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > >
> > > > This series implements r
Hi Heinrich,
On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 at 08:22, Heinrich Schuchardt
wrote:
>
> Up to now root has been the parent device for all block devices created via
> calling ConnectController(). This does not work well together with the
> implementation of bootstd.
>
> Add a dummy parent device for all EFI blo
Hi Tom,
On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 at 07:59, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 04:58:24AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 07:08, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 06:09:03AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > Hi Tom,
> > > >
> > > > On Mon
Hi Tom,
On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 at 07:41, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 04:59:40AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 09:25, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 03:38:55PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > >
> > > > This is a global default
Hi Tom,
On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 at 07:49, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 05:17:48AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 08:52, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Feb 09, 2025 at 09:07:18AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > >
> > > > It is sometimes tricky t
Hi Tom,
On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 at 07:52, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 06:38:27AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 at 13:34, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 12:43:29PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > Hi Tom,
> > > >
> > > > On Fri
On 15.02.25 16:54, Yao Zi wrote:
Structure jmp_buf_data provides the underlying format of jmp_buf, which
we actually don't care about. Clean up existing code to use the standard
jmp_buf type. This introduces no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Yao Zi
---
include/efi_loader.h | 4 ++-
Add get_display_timing ops for internal bridges linked to
panels that do not support EDID (MIPI-DSI panels for example)
or have EDID not routed.
Svyatoslav Ryhel (1):
video: bridge-uclass: add get_display_timing ops
drivers/video/bridge/video-bridge-uclass.c | 11 +++
include/video_bri
Structure jmp_buf_data provides the underlying format of jmp_buf, which
we actually don't care about. Clean up existing code to use the standard
jmp_buf type. This introduces no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Yao Zi
---
include/efi_loader.h | 4 ++--
lib/efi_loader/efi_boottime.c | 8
Add get_display_timing ops for internal bridges linked to
panels that do not support EDID (MIPI-DSI panels for example)
or have EDID not routed.
Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel
---
drivers/video/bridge/video-bridge-uclass.c | 11 +++
include/video_bridge.h | 18 ++
On 2/15/25 2:38 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Marek,
On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 at 14:27, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 2/7/25 1:49 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Marek,
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 at 13:52, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 2/6/25 1:42 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
FAILED (errors=1)
So where is the SRK_1_2_3_4_tab
Up to now root has been the parent device for all block devices created via
calling ConnectController(). This does not work well together with the
implementation of bootstd.
Add a dummy parent device for all EFI block devices.
With this change EFI block devices are also accessible via commands li
Hi Quentin,
On 10 February 2025 16:25:23 UTC, Quentin Schulz
wrote:
> [...]
>What I can say from glancing at the code is that for Rockchip they do the
>following:
>
>Register a bootsource type (e.g. MMC, SPI, I2C, USB, etc...), a bootsource
>instance of that type (e.g. MMC0, SPI3, I2C7, ...).
On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 05:11:45AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 at 05:06, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 06:59, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 06:10:54AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > Hi Tom,
> > > >
> > >
On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 04:58:24AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 07:08, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 06:09:03AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 07:33, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Feb 09, 20
On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 06:38:27AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 at 13:34, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 12:43:29PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 at 12:17, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jan 24, 20
On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 05:05:06AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Heinrich,
>
> On Sun, 9 Feb 2025 at 12:05, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >
> > Am 3. Februar 2025 18:42:00 MEZ schrieb Simon Glass :
> > >Provide a -A flag to select ARM instead of x86. For now, only the app
> > >is supported and on
On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 05:17:48AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 08:52, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 09, 2025 at 09:07:18AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > > It is sometimes tricky to figure out what modules test.py is loading
> > > when it starts up. The
On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 05:06:42AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 at 12:18, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 07:35:39PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > > This series implements read_all() so that it is possible to read all the
> > > files relating to
On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 06:02:39AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Sat, 25 Jan 2025 at 16:01, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 03:56:02PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > On Sat, 25 Jan 2025 at 15:50, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Jan 25, 20
On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 04:59:40AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 09:25, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 03:38:55PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > > This is a global default, so put it under 'default' like the tags.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sim
Hi Marek,
On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 at 14:27, Marek Vasut wrote:
>
> On 2/7/25 1:49 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Marek,
> >
> > On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 at 13:52, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2/6/25 1:42 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> > FAILED (errors=1)
> >
> > So where is the S
Hi Tom,
On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 at 13:34, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 12:43:29PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 at 12:17, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 11:57:28AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > Hi Tom,
> > > >
> > > > On Thu
Hi Heinrich,
On Sun, 9 Feb 2025 at 11:55, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
> Am 3. Februar 2025 18:41:54 MEZ schrieb Simon Glass :
> >Before this gets any longer, convert it to Python so it is easier to
> >maintain.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
> >---
> >
> > MAINTAINERS
Hi Quentin,
On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 at 06:54, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> Hi Quentin,
>
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 03:29, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> >
> > This gets rid of u-boot.rom generation as that was used only on Rockchip
> > Chromebooks and their maintainer (Simon) seems to agree[1] that
> > u-boot-roc
Please disregard the previous message, those are the actual CVE numbers:
- CVE-2025-26726 :SquashFS directory table parsing buffer overflow
- CVE-2025-26727: SquashFS inode parsing buffer overflow.
- CVE-2025-26728: SquashFS nested file reading buffer overflow.
- CVE-2025-26729: EroFS symlink reso
The original x86 EFI-app was written back in 2015, about a year before
the EFI-loader was introduced. At that point, ARM mostly used U-Boot and
FIT (Flat Image Tree).
Today, sadly, there are a few efforts to re-invent FIT poorly, to cater
to more primitive boot-environments than U-Boot. One justif
Hi folks.
Here are the CVEs assigned by MITRE:
- CVE-2025-26721: buffer overflow in the persistent storage for file creation
- CVE-2025-26722: buffer overflow in SquashFS symlink resolution
- CVE-2025-26723: buffer overflow in EXT4 symlink resolution
- CVE-2025-26724: buffer overflow in CramFS sym
Hi Mark,
On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 at 05:47, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>
> > From: Simon Glass
> > Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 04:59:06 -0700
>
> Hi Siomon, Quentin,
>
> > Hi Quentin,
> >
> > On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 09:25, Quentin Schulz
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Simon,
> > >
> > > On 2/9/25 3:28 PM, Simon Gla
Hi Tom,
On Sat, 25 Jan 2025 at 16:01, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 03:56:02PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Sat, 25 Jan 2025 at 15:50, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 03:47:26PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > Hi Tom,
> > > >
> > > > On Sat
Hi Fiona,
I'll review and test this the coming week and provide feedback.
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 13:58, Fiona Klute wrote:
> Both the Raspberry Pi downstream kernel [1] and some userspace tools
> [2] use the revision property to identify the board, and the latter
> fails if it is absent. The fi
> From: Simon Glass
> Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 04:59:06 -0700
Hi Siomon, Quentin,
> Hi Quentin,
>
> On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 09:25, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> >
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > On 2/9/25 3:28 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi Quentin,
> > >
> > > On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 at 08:46, Quentin Schulz
> >
Hi Tom,
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 08:52, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 09, 2025 at 09:07:18AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> > It is sometimes tricky to figure out what modules test.py is loading
> > when it starts up. The result can be a silent failure with no clue as to
> > what when wrong.
> >
>
Hi Jonas,
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 15:11, Jonas Karlman wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 2025-02-09 22:14, Simon Glass wrote:
> > At present simple-bin-spi relies on the u-boot.itb file created by the
> > simple-bin image. Use the template to avoid this, since Binman may
> > change to process images in
Hi Jonas,
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 14:52, Jonas Karlman wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 2025-02-09 22:14, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Move the FIT description into a template so that it can (later) be used
> > in multiple places in the image.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
> > ---
> >
> > (no changes s
Hi Tom,
On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 at 05:06, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 06:59, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 06:10:54AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 07:33, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Feb 09, 202
Hi Tom,
On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 at 12:18, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 07:35:39PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> > This series implements read_all() so that it is possible to read all the
> > files relating to a bootflow, make adjustments and then boot.
> >
> > Unfortunately quite a few
Hi Tom,
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 06:59, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 06:10:54AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 07:33, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Feb 09, 2025 at 02:14:54PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > >
> > > > The logic of this has be
Hi Fiona,
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 07:56, Fiona Klute wrote:
>
> Both the Raspberry Pi downstream kernel [1] and some userspace tools
> [2] use the revision property to identify the board, and the latter
> fails if it is absent. The firmware creates the /system node, so we
> need to do the same.
>
Hi Heinrich,
On Sun, 9 Feb 2025 at 12:05, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
> Am 3. Februar 2025 18:42:00 MEZ schrieb Simon Glass :
> >Provide a -A flag to select ARM instead of x86. For now, only the app
> >is supported and only for 64-bit ARM.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
> >---
> >
> > script
Hi Paul,
On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 at 03:53, Paul HENRYS
wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 20/11/2024 14:35, Simon Glass wrote:
> > This Mail comes from Outside of SoftAtHome: Do not answer, click links or
> > open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> > safe.
> >
> > Hi Pau
Hi Tom,
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 09:25, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 03:38:55PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> > This is a global default, so put it under 'default' like the tags.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
> > Suggested-by: Tom Rini
> > Reviewed-by: Tom Rini
>
> Please mak
Hi Quentin,
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 09:25, Quentin Schulz wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 2/9/25 3:28 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Quentin,
> >
> > On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 at 08:46, Quentin Schulz
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Simon,
> >>
> >> On 2/6/25 1:33 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> >>> Hi Quentin,
> >>>
> >>
Hi Tom,
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 07:08, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 06:09:03AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 07:33, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Feb 09, 2025 at 02:14:56PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > >
> > > > Where the bloblist is lo
70 matches
Mail list logo