On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 10:21:16AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 at 07:41, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 04:59:40AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 09:25, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 03:38:55PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > > > > > This is a global default, so put it under 'default' like the tags. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > > > > Suggested-by: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> > > > > > Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> > > > > > > > > Please make v4 include the way you redid the second patch and be on top > > > > of mainline, thanks. > > > > > > That's enough versions for me, so I'll let you do that, if you'd like. > > > It probably doesn't affect your tree as not as much is done in > > > parallel. > > > > I am disappointed. > > I'm sorry to disappoint you. > > The background is that I looked at the difference between our trees > and the gitlab files are quite different. My CI runs take about 35 > mins and it seems that yours is around 90 mins. I would like to reduce > / remove the delta (for time and patch diff), but I'm not sure how. > > My goal is to get CI runs to below 20 minutes, best case.
I'm sure CI could be quicker still with a number of faster runners. But if you can't be bothered to make changes against mainline, what is the point? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
