Re: [PATCH v5 10/10] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62x-sk-common: Add bootph-all property in phy_gmii_sel node

2024-08-25 Thread Sumit Garg
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 at 07:22, Chintan Vankar wrote: > > > > On 13/08/24 18:17, Nishanth Menon wrote: > > On 16:24-20240813, Chintan Vankar wrote: > >> Add missing bootph-all property for CPSW MAC's PHY node > >> phy_gmii_sel. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Chintan Vankar > >> Link: https://lore.kernel.

Re: OF_UPSTREAM vs. additional dtbs

2024-08-25 Thread Jan Kiszka
On 26.08.24 08:44, Sumit Garg wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 at 22:14, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> >> On 14.08.24 11:41, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> On 13.08.24 14:52, Nishanth Menon wrote: On 11:16-20240813, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to migrate the TI AM65x IOT2050 boa

Re: OF_UPSTREAM vs. additional dtbs

2024-08-25 Thread Sumit Garg
Hi, On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 at 22:14, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > On 14.08.24 11:41, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > On 13.08.24 14:52, Nishanth Menon wrote: > >> On 11:16-20240813, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I'm trying to migrate the TI AM65x IOT2050 boards to OF_UPSTREAM but I'm > >>> facing issue

Re: [PATCH 1/2] bootm: adjust the print format

2024-08-25 Thread Mattijs Korpershoek
Hi Dario, Thank you for the patch. On dim., août 25, 2024 at 14:26, Dario Binacchi wrote: > All three addresses printed are in hexadecimal format, but only the > first two have the "0x" prefix. The patch aligns the format of the > "end" address with the other two by adding the "0x" prefix. > >

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mtd: rawnand: meson: refactor use of 'meson_nfc_cmd_access()'

2024-08-25 Thread Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
Hi On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 8:17 AM Arseniy Krasnov wrote: > > Move call 'meson_nfc_cmd_seed()' and check for 'NAND_NEED_SCRAMBLING' > to 'meson_nfc_cmd_access()', thus removing code duplication. > > Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov > --- > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c | 30 --

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mtd: rawnand: nand_base: support for 'NAND_IS_BOOT_MEDIUM' flag

2024-08-25 Thread Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
Hi On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 8:17 AM Arseniy Krasnov wrote: > > Based on Linux kernel: > commit f922bd798bb9 ("mtd: rawnand: add an option to specify NAND chip as a > boot device") > > Allow to define a NAND chip as a boot device. This can be helpful > for the selection of the ECC algorithm and st

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Meson: R/W support for pages used by boot ROM

2024-08-25 Thread Arseniy Krasnov
On 26.08.2024 09:15, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote: > Hi Aresenly > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 10:53 AM Neil Armstrong > wrote: >> >> On 23/08/2024 10:29, Arseniy Krasnov wrote: >>> Hi! Got it, thanks! >>> >>> On 23.08.2024 11:10, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote: Hi Arseniy

[PATCH v2 3/3] mtd: rawnand: meson: read/write access for boot ROM pages

2024-08-25 Thread Arseniy Krasnov
Boot ROM on Meson needs some pages to be read/written in a special mode: 384 byte ECC mode (so called "short" by Amlogic) and with scrambling enabled. Such pages are located on the chip in the following way (for example): [ p0 ][ p1 ][ p2 ][ p3 ][ p4 ][ p5 ][ p6 ][ p7 ] ... [ pN ] ^ ^

[PATCH v2 2/3] mtd: rawnand: meson: refactor use of 'meson_nfc_cmd_access()'

2024-08-25 Thread Arseniy Krasnov
Move call 'meson_nfc_cmd_seed()' and check for 'NAND_NEED_SCRAMBLING' to 'meson_nfc_cmd_access()', thus removing code duplication. Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov --- drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c | 30 -- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --g

[RESEND PATCH v2 0/3] Meson: R/W support for pages used by boot ROM

2024-08-25 Thread Arseniy Krasnov
Patchset is based on patchset for Linux (today merged to nand-next): https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20240507230903.3399594-1-avkras...@salutedevices.com/ Here is description from it: > Amlogic's boot ROM code needs that some pages on NAND must be written > in special "short" ECC mode with

[PATCH v2 1/3] mtd: rawnand: nand_base: support for 'NAND_IS_BOOT_MEDIUM' flag

2024-08-25 Thread Arseniy Krasnov
Based on Linux kernel: commit f922bd798bb9 ("mtd: rawnand: add an option to specify NAND chip as a boot device") Allow to define a NAND chip as a boot device. This can be helpful for the selection of the ECC algorithm and strength in case the boot ROM supports only a subset of controller provided

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Meson: R/W support for pages used by boot ROM

2024-08-25 Thread Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
Hi Aresenly On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 10:53 AM Neil Armstrong wrote: > > On 23/08/2024 10:29, Arseniy Krasnov wrote: > > Hi! Got it, thanks! > > > > On 23.08.2024 11:10, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote: > >> Hi Arseniy > >> > >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 9:04 AM Arseniy Krasnov > >> wrote: > >>> >

Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] soc: ti: k3-navss-ringacc: Fix reset ring API

2024-08-25 Thread Sverdlin, Alexander
Hi Chintan, On Mon, 2024-08-26 at 09:24 +0530, Chintan Vankar wrote: > > > > > From: Vignesh Raghavendra > > > > > > > > > > Expectation of k3_ringacc_ring_reset_raw() is to reset the ring to > > > > > requested size and not to 0. Fix this. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra

Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] soc: ti: k3-navss-ringacc: Fix reset ring API

2024-08-25 Thread Chintan Vankar
On 23/08/24 16:03, Sverdlin, Alexander wrote: Hi Chintan, On Fri, 2024-08-23 at 15:22 +0530, Chintan Vankar wrote: On 16/08/24 17:58, Sverdlin, Alexander wrote: Hi Chintan, Vignesh, On Fri, 2024-07-05 at 10:20 +0530, Chintan Vankar wrote: From: Vignesh Raghavendra Expectation of k3_ring

RE: [PATCH v9 36/37] [TESTING] configs: set CONFIG_NET=y for FTGMAC100

2024-08-25 Thread ChiaWei Wang
Reviewed-by: Chia-Wei Wang > -Original Message- > From: Jerome Forissier > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2024 9:49 PM > To: u-boot@lists.denx.de > Cc: Ilias Apalodimas ; Javier Tia > ; Raymond Mao ; Maxim > Uvarov ; Tim Harvey ; > Anton Antonov ; Jerome Forissier > ; Maxim Sloyko ; Tom > Rini

Re: [PATCH 1/2] bootm: adjust the print format

2024-08-25 Thread E Shattow
On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 5:26 AM Dario Binacchi wrote: > > All three addresses printed are in hexadecimal format, but only the > first two have the "0x" prefix. The patch aligns the format of the > "end" address with the other two by adding the "0x" prefix. > > Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi > ---

Re: xPL terminology

2024-08-25 Thread E Shattow
Hi Simon, On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 6:07 AM Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi, > > We have the term 'SPL', which has a dual meaning. It is both a > particular phase of U-Boot (the one that loads U-Boot proper) and a > generic name for any pre-proper phase. ZBL or ZSBL: Zeroth Stage Boot Loader (usually in

xPL terminology

2024-08-25 Thread Simon Glass
Hi, We have the term 'SPL', which has a dual meaning. It is both a particular phase of U-Boot (the one that loads U-Boot proper) and a generic name for any pre-proper phase. You can see that in a few areas, but for example CONFIG_SPL_BUILD is enabled for TPL and VPL builds, not just SPL. I propo

[PATCH 2/2] cmd: booti: adjust the print format

2024-08-25 Thread Dario Binacchi
All three addresses printed are in hexadecimal format, but only the first two have the "0x" prefix. The patch aligns the format of the "end" address with the other two by adding the "0x" prefix. Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi --- cmd/booti.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

[PATCH 1/2] bootm: adjust the print format

2024-08-25 Thread Dario Binacchi
All three addresses printed are in hexadecimal format, but only the first two have the "0x" prefix. The patch aligns the format of the "end" address with the other two by adding the "0x" prefix. Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi --- boot/bootm.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)