[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: atmel: sama5d4 xplained: enable mmc power

Enable the power for MMC/SD port. Signed-off-by: Bo Shen --- board/atmel/sama5d4_xplained/sama5d4_xplained.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/board/atmel/sama5d4_xplained/sama5d4_xplained.c b/board/atmel/sama5d4_xplained/sama5d4_xplained.c index bc2aa38..e7f225a 100644 --

[U-Boot] [PATCH v1 2/3] fastboot: Correct fastboot_fail and fastboot_okay strings

If the string is copied without NULL termination using strncpy(), then strncat() on the next line, may concatenate the string after some stale (or random) data, if the response string was not zero-initialized. Signed-off-by: Dileep Katta --- common/fb_mmc.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions

[U-Boot] [PATCH v1 3/3] usb: gadget: fastboot: Set the Serial Number for Fastboot Gadget

Configure the serial number using the serial# environment variable during the fastboot bind. This enables "fastboot devices" to return the serial number for the attached devices. Signed-off-by: Dileep Katta --- drivers/usb/gadget/f_fastboot.c | 5 + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --g

[U-Boot] [PATCH v1 1/3] fastboot: OUT transaction length must be aligned to wMaxPacketSize

OUT transactions must be aligned to wMaxPacketSize for each transfer, or else transfer will not complete successfully. This patch modifies rx_bytes_expected to return a transfer length that is aligned to wMaxPacketSize. Note that the value of ep->desc->wMaxPacketSize and ep->maxpacket may not be t

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/8] lpc32xx: add GPIO support

Hi Simon, Le Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:06:51 -0700, Simon Glass a écrit : > Hi Albert, > > On 12 February 2015 at 10:37, Albert ARIBAUD (3ADEV) > wrote: > > This driver only supports Driver Model, not legacy model. > > > > Signed-off-by: Albert ARIBAUD (3ADEV) > > --- > > > > Changes in v2: > > - m

[U-Boot] please pull u-boot-arc master

Dear Tom, The following changes since commit bd2a4888b123713adec271d6c8040ca9f609aa2f: sunxi: configs/sunxi-common.h: Enable CONFIG_CMD_PART (2015-02-11 19:43:45 -0500) are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-arc.git for you to fetch changes up to f13606b77d32344d

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arc: introduce U-Boot port for ARCv2 ISA

On Tue, 2015-02-10 at 13:38 +0300, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > ARC HS and ARC EM are new cores based on ARCv2 ISA which is binary > incompatible with ISAv1 (AKA ARCompact). > > Significant difference between ISAv2 and v1 is implementation of > interrupt vector table. > > In v1 it is implemented in th

[U-Boot] MPC8541 / MPC8555E: DDR_SDRAM_CLK_CNLT[SS_EN] handling

Hello, I am curious about the setting of the SS_EN bit in the DDR_SDRAM_CLK_CNLT register: Source synchronous enable. This bit field must be set during initialization. See Section 9.6.1, “DDR SDRAM Initialization Sequence,” for details. 0 - Reserved 1 - The address and command are

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 7/8] lpc32xx: add lpc32xx-spl.bin boot image target

On 12 February 2015 at 10:37, Albert ARIBAUD (3ADEV) wrote: > Signed-off-by: Albert ARIBAUD (3ADEV) > --- > > Changes in v2: > - move boot image generation to mkimage framework > > common/image.c | 1 + > include/image.h | 1 + > scripts/Makefile.spl | 9 +++ > tools/Makefile

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] net: Add basic driver model support to Ethernet stack

Hi Joe, On 10 February 2015 at 23:25, Joe Hershberger wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:25 PM, Simon Glass wrote: >> >> Hi Joe, >> >> On 2 February 2015 at 17:38, Joe Hershberger >> wrote: >> > First just add support for MAC drivers. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Joe Hershberger >> > >> > --- >

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v3 01/14] dm: core: Allow seq numbers to be resolved before probe

Hi Joe, On 10 February 2015 at 23:08, Joe Hershberger wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Simon Glass wrote: >> >> Hi Joe, >> >> On 10 February 2015 at 18:30, Joe Hershberger >> wrote: >> > Before this patch, if the sequence numbers were resolved before probe, >> > this cod

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] arm: ls102xa: Fix interleaving issue on CCI400 slave interface S2

On silicon VER1.0, there is an interleaving issue on CCI400 slave interface S2. The workaround is to enable regulation of outstanding read transactions for slave interface S2. Signed-off-by: Alison Wang --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/immap_ls102xa.h | 2 ++ board/freescale/ls1021aqds/ls10

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] arm: ls102xa: Add silicon version detection for QDS and TWR boards

For LS102xA, some workarounds are only used in VER1.0, so silicon version detection are added for QDS and TWR boards. Signed-off-by: Alison Wang --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/immap_ls102xa.h | 3 + board/freescale/ls1021aqds/ls1021aqds.c | 69 --- board/fre

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/8] lpc32xx: add GPIO support

Hi Albert, On 12 February 2015 at 10:37, Albert ARIBAUD (3ADEV) wrote: > This driver only supports Driver Model, not legacy model. > > Signed-off-by: Albert ARIBAUD (3ADEV) > --- > > Changes in v2: > - move from legacy to Driver Model support > > arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/lpc32xx/devices.c | 5 +

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot for Snow problem

Hi Michal, On 11 February 2015 at 10:16, Michal Suchanek wrote: > > Hello, > > I changed the SYS_START to work around the bug in the manufacturer > firmware, applied snow_defconfig, built u-boot.bin, packed it into > kernel uimage, signed it, copied it to a kernel partition, bumped > priority of

[U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-sh/rmolbile

Dear Tom Rini. Please pull u-boot-sh rmobile branch. The following changes since commit a4fb5df214c7e8d5bc949c1068d92252f105427a: Merge branch 'microblaze' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-microblaze (2015-02-09 11:44:46 -0500) are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-sh

[U-Boot] [PATCH V2 1/3] bcm2835/rpi: add SPDX license tags for some files

Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren --- V2: No changes. arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/bcm2835/Makefile | 12 ++-- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-bcm2835/sdhci.h | 12 +--- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-bcm2835/timer.h | 12 +--- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-bcm2835/wdog.h | 12 +--- bo

[U-Boot] [PATCH V2 3/3] rpi: add support for Raspberry Pi 2 model B

USB doesn't seem to work yet; the controller detects the on-board Hub/ Ethernet device but can't read the descriptors from it. I haven't investigated yet. Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren --- V2: Implement new board_rev decoding scheme, to avoid hard-coding the board revision onthe RPi 2. arch/arm

[U-Boot] [PATCH V2 2/3] bcm2836 SoC support (used in Raspberry Pi 2 model B)

The bcm2835 and bcm2836 are essentially identical, except: - The CPU is an ARM1176 v.s. a quad-core Cortex-A7. - The physical address of many IO controllers has moved. Rather than introducing a whole new bcm2836 value for $(SOC) or $(ARCH), update the existing bcm2835 code to handle the minor diff

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: HYP/non-sec: relocation before enable secondary cores

Hi, Albert and Tom On 2/4/2015 7:02 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote: On 04/02/15 10:15, Peng Fan wrote: If CONFIG_ARMV7_PSCI is not defined and CONFIG_ARMV7_SECURE_BASE is defined, smp_kicl_all_cpus may enable secondary cores and runs into secure_ram_addr( _smp_pen), before code is relocated to secure r

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 07/12] imx:mx6 Support LDO bypass

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Tim Harvey wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 2:49 AM, Robin Gong wrote: > >>> >>> This is very board dependent. Here you are referring to a board that >>> has a reset input to the PMIC's from the IMX6's watchdog output. In >>> this case, this reset routing/pinmux

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sandbox: Adjust the order of the NO_SDL check

Hello Simon, On 11-02-15 02:52, Simon Glass wrote: An option is provided to avoid using SDL in U-Boot sandbox (and drop support for the LCD). However the check in the Makefile is too late and warnings are printed even if NO_SDL=y is given. Adjust the order to avoid this warning. Signed-off-by:

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] dm: Add support for all targets which requires MANUAL_RELOC

On 10 February 2015 at 02:55, Michal Simek wrote: > > On 02/09/2015 11:14 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi MIchal, > > > > On 9 February 2015 at 03:27, Michal Simek wrote: > >> Hi Simon, > >> > >> On 02/06/2015 06:45 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > >>> > >>> With a heavy heart: > >>> > >>> Acked-by: Simon

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 3/3] dm:gpio:mxc add DT support

On 10 February 2015 at 17:37, Simon Glass wrote: > On 10 February 2015 at 00:46, Igor Grinberg wrote: >> On 02/10/15 08:46, Peng Fan wrote: >>> This patch add DT support for mxc gpio driver. >>> >>> There are one place using CONFIG_OF_CONTROL macro. >>> 1. The U_BOOT_DEVICES and mxc_plat array ar

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 4/4] dm: Drop unused driver model config_defaults

On 11 February 2015 at 16:33, Simon Glass wrote: > These are now in Kconfig so we can drop them from the header file. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass > --- > > Changes in v3: None > Changes in v2: None > > include/config_defaults.h | 12 > 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-) Applied to

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 2/3] dm:gpio:mxc add a bank_index entry in platdata

On 10 February 2015 at 17:37, Simon Glass wrote: > On 9 February 2015 at 23:46, Peng Fan wrote: >> Add a new entry in platdata structure and intialize >> bank_index in mxc_plat array. >> This new entry can avoid using `plat - mxc_plat` by using >> `plat->bank_index`. >> >> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/3] dm: introduce dev_get_addr interface

On 10 February 2015 at 17:37, Simon Glass wrote: > On 9 February 2015 at 23:46, Peng Fan wrote: >> Abstracting dev_get_addr can improve drivers that want to >> get device's address. >> >> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan >> Acked-by: Igor Grinberg >> --- >> drivers/core/device.c | 12 >> i

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/4] dm: Kconfig: Move CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN to Kconfig

On 11 February 2015 at 16:32, Simon Glass wrote: > Move this option to Kconfig and update all boards. > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass > --- > > Changes in v3: None > Changes in v2: > - Add CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F as well as CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN Applied to u-boot-dm. _

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/4] dm: at91: snapper: Move driver model CONFIGs to Kconfig

On 11 February 2015 at 16:32, Simon Glass wrote: > Remove driver model CONFIGs from the board config headers and use Kconfig > instead. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass > --- > > Changes in v3: > - Split out the ATMEL_PIO_PORTS change into its own patch > > Changes in v2: None > > configs/snapper9

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/4] dm: at91: Drop use of ATMEL_PIO_PORTS in the header file

On 12 February 2015 at 02:14, Andreas Bießmann wrote: > On 02/12/2015 12:32 AM, Simon Glass wrote: >> With driver model the number of PIO ports is defined by platform data, so >> remove it from the header file. >> >> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass > > Acked-by: Andreas Bießmann Applied to u-boot-dm

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] dm: sh: serial: Add support driver model

On 12 February 2015 at 15:14, Simon Glass wrote: > On 11 February 2015 at 21:48, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu > wrote: >> This adds driver model support with this driver. This was tested by Koelsch >> board and Gose board. >> >> Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu >> --- >> V5: Fix build with SH7723 and mor

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] dm: sh: serial: Add support driver model

On 11 February 2015 at 21:48, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > This adds driver model support with this driver. This was tested by Koelsch > board and Gose board. > > Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu > --- > V5: Fix build with SH7723 and more. > V4: Fix build with SH. > V3: Add function of checki

[U-Boot] [sunxi] [RFC/RFH] Adding mainline u-boot support for the Olimex A20-SOM-EVB

Hello, I am working on adding support for the Olimex A20-SOM-EVB development board to mainline u-boot (and to the mainline Linux kernel, but that is a topic for a different thread). The board package actually consists of two parts, the A20-SOM-EVB baseboard providing I/O and power supply, and the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 08/10] arm: socfpga: Add Altera Arria V DK support

On Thursday, February 12, 2015 at 09:29:47 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I think we can improve this later. In the end, the structure should be > > either the way DTs are structured in kernel OR we should have just one > > single config for all SoCFPGA boards. The later is of course pref

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 08/10] arm: socfpga: Add Altera Arria V DK support

> Hi! > > I think we can improve this later. In the end, the structure should be either > the way DTs are structured in kernel OR we should have just one single config > for all SoCFPGA boards. The later is of course preferred. > > For now, I'm tempted to apply this as-is so we at least have the

Re: [U-Boot] moderated list?

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 08:13:40PM +0100, Marco Cavallini wrote: > "Your mail to 'U-Boot' is being held until the list moderator can > review it for approval." > > Is this list moderated ? For some long time, yes, you must be subscribed and certain emails (large size, large # of recipients)

[U-Boot] moderated list?

"Your mail to 'U-Boot' is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval." Is this list moderated ? ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 7/8] lpc32xx: add lpc32xx-spl.bin boot image target

Signed-off-by: Albert ARIBAUD (3ADEV) --- Changes in v2: - move boot image generation to mkimage framework common/image.c | 1 + include/image.h | 1 + scripts/Makefile.spl | 9 +++ tools/Makefile | 1 + tools/lpc32xximage.c | 178 +++

[U-Boot] i.MX28 u-boot SPL fail

Hi, On a custom i.MX28 board I am using u-boot-2015.01. The debug port DUART is not the same as i.MX28, so I changed these settings in iomux.c: const iomux_cfg_t iomux_setup[] = { /* DUART */ // MX28_PAD_PWM0__DUART_RX, // MX28_PAD_PWM1__DUART_TX, /* DUART */ /* Unconfigure BOOT ROM default

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/8] Extend LPC32xx functionality and add LPC32xx-based work_92015 board

This series extends functionality for the LPC32xx platform and introduces the WORK Microwave work_92105 board which makes use of the extended functionality. NOTES: The series is not entirely checkpatch-clean. The following warnings and checks were not fixed: 1. "warning: arch/arm/Kconfig,241: pl

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 8/8] lpc32xx: add support for board work_92105

Work_92105 from Work Microwave is an LPC3250- based board with the following features: - 64MB SDR DRAM - 1 GB SLC NAND, managed through MLC controller. - Ethernet - Ethernet + PHY SMSC8710 - I2C: - EEPROM (24M01-compatible) - RTC (DS1374-compatible) - Temperature sensor (DS620) - DACs (2 x

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 6/8] dtt: add ds620 support

Signed-off-by: Albert ARIBAUD (3ADEV) --- Changes in v2: - cosmetic: added a blank line before copyright drivers/hwmon/Makefile | 1 + drivers/hwmon/ds620.c | 65 ++ include/dtt.h | 15 ++-- 3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 7

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 5/8] lpc32xx: add LPC32xx SSP support (SPI mode)

Signed-off-by: Albert ARIBAUD (3ADEV) --- Changes in v2: - added MUX setting for SSP0 arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/lpc32xx/devices.c | 14 +++ arch/arm/include/asm/arch-lpc32xx/clk.h | 3 + arch/arm/include/asm/arch-lpc32xx/sys_proto.h | 1 + drivers/spi/Makefile

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/8] lpc32xx: add GPIO support

This driver only supports Driver Model, not legacy model. Signed-off-by: Albert ARIBAUD (3ADEV) --- Changes in v2: - move from legacy to Driver Model support arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/lpc32xx/devices.c | 5 + arch/arm/include/asm/arch-lpc32xx/gpio.h | 43 + drivers/gpio/Makefile

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/8] lpc32xx: i2c: add LPC32xx I2C interface support

Signed-off-by: Albert ARIBAUD (3ADEV) --- Changes in v2: None arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/lpc32xx/devices.c | 11 ++ arch/arm/include/asm/arch-lpc32xx/clk.h | 4 + arch/arm/include/asm/arch-lpc32xx/cpu.h | 2 + arch/arm/include/asm/arch-lpc32xx/sys_proto.h | 1 + drivers/i2c/

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/8] lpc32xx: add Ethernet support

Signed-off-by: Albert ARIBAUD (3ADEV) --- Changes in v2: None arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/lpc32xx/cpu.c | 9 + arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/lpc32xx/devices.c | 7 + arch/arm/include/asm/arch-lpc32xx/config.h| 3 + arch/arm/include/asm/arch-lpc32xx/sys_proto.h | 1 + drivers/net/M

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/8] lpc32xx: mtd: nand: add MLC NAND controller

The controller's Reed-Solomon ECC hardware is used except of course for raw reads and writes. It covers in- and out-of-band data together. The SPL framework is supported. Signed-off-by: Albert ARIBAUD (3ADEV) --- Changes in v2: None arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/lpc32xx/devices.c | 6 + arch/

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v1 1/1] usb: gadget: fastboot: Add fastboot erase

On 15-02-12 01:21 AM, Dileep Katta wrote: Hi Rob, On 12 February 2015 at 14:35, Rob Herring wrote: On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 2:49 AM, Dileep Katta wrote: Adds the fastboot erase functionality, to erase a partition specified by name. The erase is performed based on erase group size, to avoid

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] imx6: Added DEK blob generator command

From: Raul Cardenas Freescale's SEC block has built-in Data Encryption Key(DEK) Blob Protocol which provides a method for protecting a DEK for non-secure memory storage. SEC block protects data in a data structure called a Secret Key Blob, which provides both confidentiality and integrity protect

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3] arm: reduce .bss section clear time

On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:51:00AM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > Hi Simon, > > > Hi Lukasz, > > > > On 2 February 2015 at 01:46, Lukasz Majewski > > wrote: > > > Dear All, > > > > > >> And the next is interesting. > > >> odroid_defconfig has more than 80MB for malloc (we need about > > >> 64

[U-Boot] [PATCH] misc: Call calloc() not malloc() to ensure buffer is zeroed

- mpc512x_fec.c: 'fec' was not being memset while dev was, just call calloc() instead for both. 'bd' was being memset afterwards but given that it's an awkward looking call, just calloc() it directly. - bzlib.c: Some fields to 'bzf' are being set to NULL later but for clarity calloc() the st

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] ARM: Merge v7 and v8 outer cache operations

On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 03:08:54AM +, feng...@phytium.com.cn wrote: > From: David Feng > > Armv7 and Armv8 allow outer cache exist, it is outside of the architecture > defined cache hierarchy and can not be manipulated by architecture defined > instructions. It's processor specific. > This pa

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] arm: relocation: clear .bss section with arch memset if defined

On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 03:38:42AM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hello Przemyslaw, > > On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 13:55:42 +0100, Przemyslaw Marczak > wrote: > > For ARM architecture, enable the CONFIG_USE_ARCH_MEMSET/MEMCPY, > > will highly increase the memset/memcpy performance. This is able > > than

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] ARM: Merge v7 and v8 outer cache operations

On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 11:08:54AM +0800, feng...@phytium.com.cn wrote: > From: David Feng > > Armv7 and Armv8 allow outer cache exist, it is outside of the architecture > defined cache hierarchy and can not be manipulated by architecture defined > instructions. It's processor specific. > This p

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 07/10] ARM: remove cm4008 and cm41xx board support

Hi Masahiro, On 12/02/15 11:17, Masahiro Yamada wrote: Hi Greg, On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:12:25 +1000 Greg Ungerer wrote: Hi Masahiro, On 10/02/15 17:00, Masahiro Yamada wrote: These are still non-generic boards. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada Cc: Greg Ungerer I have only seen this one p

[U-Boot] [PATCH] add example for file on VFAT filesystem usage

For example on a raspberry pi the u-boot environment can be saved in a file on the first VFAT partition. This example illustrates how to use it with fw_printenv/fw_setenv. Signed-off-by: Waldemar Brodkorb --- tools/env/fw_env.config | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/en

[U-Boot] bootvx command: flush cache not working properly

Hello all, I have a board with CPU powerpc-p1015 and DDR RAM. I am using VxWorks application executed in the following way: 1. The application load is saved on NOR flash. 2. The application is copied to RAM with: "cp.l $source_address $dest_address $size" 3. Then the applica

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/3] imx: mx6slevk add pmic support

Hi Peng, On 12/02/2015 02:36, Peng Fan wrote: > This patch set is extracted from the previous "imx:mx6 add ldo bypass" > patch set, with only one return value change. > > patch 1/3 is add pad settings for I2C1 > patch 2/3 is add I2C and PMIC support in board header file > patch 3/3 is to add pmic

[U-Boot] [PATCH] m68k: Add generic board support for MCF547X/8X and MCF5445X

This patch adds generic board support for MCF547X/8X and MCF5445X. It is based on the patch about common generic board support for M68K architecture sent by Angelo. Signed-off-by: Alison Wang --- common/board_f.c | 8 common/board_r.c | 2 +- include/asm-generic/

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Documentation: gpio: fix bindings document

[ imported from Linux Kernel, commit 74981fb81d83 ] Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij --- doc/device-tree-bindings/gpio/gpio.txt | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/device-tree-bindings/gpio/gpio.txt

[U-Boot] [PATCH][v5] crypto/fsl - Add progressive hashing support using hardware acceleration.

Currently only normal hashing is supported using hardware acceleration. Added support for progressive hashing using hardware. Signed-off-by: Ruchika Gupta Signed-off-by: Gaurav Rana CC: Simon Glass --- Changes in v5: Modify description for CONFIG_SHA256, CONFIG_SHA256. Changes in v4: Add CONFI

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v1 1/1] usb: gadget: fastboot: Add fastboot erase

Hi Rob, On 12 February 2015 at 14:35, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 2:49 AM, Dileep Katta wrote: >> Adds the fastboot erase functionality, to erase a partition >> specified by name. The erase is performed based on erase group size, >> to avoid erasing other partitions. The start a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/4] dm: at91: Drop use of ATMEL_PIO_PORTS in the header file

On 02/12/2015 12:32 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > With driver model the number of PIO ports is defined by platform data, so > remove it from the header file. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass Acked-by: Andreas Bießmann > --- > > Changes in v3: > - Split out the ATMEL_PIO_PORTS change into its own pat

[U-Boot] [PATCH] crypto/fsl: Make function names consistent for blob encapsulation/decapsulation.

This patch does the following: 1. The function names for encapsulation and decapsulation were inconsistent in freescale's implementation and cmd_blob file. This patch corrects the issue. 2. The function prototype is also modified to change the length parameter from u8 to u32 to allow encapsulation

[U-Boot] [PATCH][v4] crypto/fsl - Add progressive hashing support using hardware acceleration.

Currently only normal hashing is supported using hardware acceleration. Added support for progressive hashing using hardware. Signed-off-by: Ruchika Gupta Signed-off-by: Gaurav Rana CC: Simon Glass --- Changes in v4: Add CONFIG_SHA256, CONFIG_SHA256, CONFIG_SHA_PROG_HW_ACCEL, CONFIG_SHA_HW_ACCE

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/9] ARM: remove non-generic boards

Based on Tom's announce mail (http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2015-February/203606.html), let's start removing non-generic ARM boards. No conversion patches have been posted for these boards. Changes in v3: - Do not remove devkit3250 because Vladimir has post a patch to convert it i

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 8/9] ARM: remove tnetv107x board support

This is still a non-generic board. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada Cc: Chan-Taek Park --- Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: None arch/arm/Kconfig | 5 - arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/Makefile | 1 - arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/start.S | 22

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 6/9] ARM: remove cm4008 and cm41xx board support

These are still non-generic boards. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada Cc: Greg Ungerer --- Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: None arch/arm/Kconfig| 10 - arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/Makefile | 1 - arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/ks8695/Makefile| 9 - arch/a

[U-Boot] [Q] Why does SPL use uImage load address as entry point?

Hi, I'm doing some work with U-Boot SPL, and noticed the following code in the spl_parse_image_header function (common/spl/spl.c): if (image_get_magic(header) == IH_MAGIC) { if (spl_image.flags & SPL_COPY_PAYLOAD_ONLY) { ... } else {

Re: [U-Boot] Can I load uEnv.txt conditionally, based on the boot source?

Hello, That would be the most obvious thing, wouldn't it. I thought of that, but am not sure of the answer in u-boot. Thanks, Brian On 2/11/2015 12:09 AM, Joe Hershberger wrote: On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Brian Smucker > wrote: > > Hello, > > I was wonde

Re: [U-Boot] [MinnowBoard] Mainline U-Boot for MinnowBoard MAX

Hi Simon, great to hear! Currently I'm a little bit busy (bringing up of a E3800 board arriving yesterday from production), but as soon as possible I'll give it a try! Thank you very much for your work! Best Regards, Martin > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: elinux-MinnowBoard [mailto:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 07/12] imx:mx6 Support LDO bypass

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 06:33:38AM -0800, Tim Harvey wrote: > On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Peng Fan wrote: > > The basic graph for voltage input is: > >VDDARM_IN ---> LDO_DIG(ARM) ---> VDD_ARM_CAP > >VDDSOC_IN ---> LDO_DIG(SOC) ---> VDD_SOC_CAP > > > > Hi Peng, > > Glad to see someon

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v1 1/1] usb: gadget: fastboot: Add fastboot erase

Hi Steve, On 11 February 2015 at 05:25, Steve Rae wrote: > > Hi, Dileep > > > On 15-02-10 12:49 AM, Dileep Katta wrote: >> >> Adds the fastboot erase functionality, to erase a partition >> specified by name. The erase is performed based on erase group size, >> to avoid erasing other partitions. T