Hello,
I think this segfault below is not wanted?
$ ./MAKEALL sandbox
Configuring for sandbox board...
textdata bss dec hex filename
1314976048 28488 166033 28891 ./u-boot
- SUMMARY
Boards compiled: 1
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Doubling it is kind of aggressive strategy. You know exactly how much
> free room needs to be guaranteed, so why don't you auto-adjust the
> size?
>
>> -#define CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_LEN (128 * 1024) /* Reserved for malloc
>> */
>> +
Dear Timur Tabi,
In message <1332024240-23286-1-git-send-email-ti...@freescale.com> you wrote:
> The malloc buffer is not large enough to hold a flash sector (0x2 bytes)
> in addition to whatever else it normally holds, so double its size. This
> fixes a failure trying to save the environment
The malloc buffer is not large enough to hold a flash sector (0x2 bytes)
in addition to whatever else it normally holds, so double its size. This
fixes a failure trying to save the environment:
=> save
Saving Environment to Flash...
Unable to save the rest of sector (122880)
. done
Protected
Dear Aneesh V,
In message <4f153c83.20...@ti.com> you wrote:
>
> What is your final call on this? The above arguments sound convincing
> to me, but I have to admit that I am no legal expert. Either way, it
> will be great to have a closure on this. Lack of fastboot support was
> the greatest impe
Dear Sebastian,
In message <2023100316.ga6...@linutronix.de> you wrote:
>
> >No, it's the "Redistributions in binary form must reproduce..."
> >clause.
...
> So right now, I don't see why those two should not be compatible. Plus
> the FSF claims that they are [1].
Sorry, my fault. I confuse
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <1331010031-11171-1-git-send-email-vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
> All the global flag defines are the same across all arches. So unify them
> in one place, and add a simple way for arches to extend for their needs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger
> ---
> v2
>
Dear "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_Bie=DFmann?=",
In message <4f5f61c1.5090...@gmail.com> you wrote:
> The following changes since commit 6751b05f855bbe56005d5b88d4eb58bcd52170d2:
>
> Revert "post/Makefile: Only build FP post tests if enabled via
> CONFIG_SYS_POST_FPU" (2012-03-12 15:00:23 +0100)
>
>
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <1331565069-17804-1-git-send-email-vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
> The following changes since commit e37ae40e9dec9af417c19de72f76becebf160730:
>
> image: Support FDTs already loaded at their load address (2012-03-06
> 22:18:48 +0100)
>
> are available in the g
Dear Nobuhiro Iwamatsu,
In message
you wrote:
> Dear Wolfgang Denk.
>
> Please pull u-boot-sh/master.
>
> The following changes since commit e37ae40e9dec9af417c19de72f76becebf160730=
> :
>
> image: Support FDTs already loaded at their load address (2012-03-06
> 22:18:48 +0100)
>
> are avai
Dear Otavio Salvador,
In message <1332011810-8-1-git-send-email-ota...@ossystems.com.br> you
wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
> ---
> tools/mxsboot.c |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engin
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
---
tools/mxsboot.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/mxsboot.c b/tools/mxsboot.c
index 8246831..6c05aa4 100644
--- a/tools/mxsboot.c
+++ b/tools/mxsboot.c
@@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ static int mx28_nand_write_firmware(struct m
Dear Tom Rini,
In message
you wrote:
>
> > See "arch/arm/config.mk", search for "For EABI, make sure to provide
> > raise()".
> >
> > Check why arch/arm/lib/eabi_compat.c does not get compiled / linked.
>
> Even if ELDK5.1 is totally fine? And other modern toolchains as well..
Yes, this probl
From: David Purdy
This patch adds support for Cloud Engines Pogoplug E02
Information regarding the CE Pogoplug E02 board can be found at:
http://archlinuxarm.org/platforms/armv5/pogoplug-v2-pinkgray
Signed-off-by: David Purdy
Cc: prafu...@marvell.com
Cc: albert.u.b...@aribaud.net
---
Changes f
On 17/03/2012 16:24, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Dear Tom Rini,
>>
Hi Tom,
>> In message <20120316212442.GE31661@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>>>
>>> OK. But now we add to the ELDK 4.2 saga. This series adds not just a
>>> warning (well, 5 for CONFIG_
Am 17/03/2012 15:30, schrieb Fabio Estevam:
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 5:23 AM, stefano babic wrote:
>
Hi Fabio,
>> I do not see pmic_dialog.c and where the constants for dialog are
>> definded. Have I missed another patch ?
>
> Sorry, I missed to do "git add" for these files. On this RFC I am
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Tom Rini,
>
> In message <20120316212442.GE31661@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>>
>> OK. But now we add to the ELDK 4.2 saga. This series adds not just a
>> warning (well, 5 for CONFIG_OMAP I guess, 1 for everything else) for
>> everything
Dear Tom Rini,
In message <20120316212442.GE31661@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>
> OK. But now we add to the ELDK 4.2 saga. This series adds not just a
> warning (well, 5 for CONFIG_OMAP I guess, 1 for everything else) for
> everything ARM but also breaks everything else over undefined reference
> t
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 5:23 AM, stefano babic wrote:
> I do not see pmic_dialog.c and where the constants for dialog are
> definded. Have I missed another patch ?
Sorry, I missed to do "git add" for these files. On this RFC I am
mainly interested in getting feedback about the reported CPU
frequ
On 17/03/2012 10:33, Dirk Behme wrote:
> Hmm, I'm unsure about this. Looking at the 3 referenced Freescale
> patches and at the way the Freescale commits look, I was under the
> impression that the first patch was improved by Freescale two times to
> the then 'final' state.
>
> At least the first
On 03/03/2012 23:37, Eric Nelson wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson
> ---
Hi Eric,
I have added Andy in CC as MMC Maintainer
> drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c | 12 +++-
> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c b/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c
>
On 15.03.2012 10:56, Stefano Babic wrote:
On 08/03/2012 13:36, Dirk Behme wrote:
This patch imports three patches from the Freescale U-Boot with the following
commit messages:
ENGR00156405 ESDHC: Add workaround for auto-clock gate errata ENGcm03648
http://git.freescale.com/git/cgit.cgi/imx/uboo
Hello
Our linux boxes with Uboot and frescale mpc5200B are set at production with
software and that is no problem.
But then when the need to update software afterwards in the field is today
only so simple that if uboot finds a usb stick with a file uImage then it
will start that and do all the upd
Am 16/03/2012 22:01, schrieb Fabio Estevam:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>
>> I would be glad to receive some suggestion in order to get the 1GHz frequency
>> printed during the initial boot log.
>
> If I print the frequency inside board_late_init() then I see the
> co
Am 17/03/2012 05:34, schrieb Thomas Weber:
> Hello,
> On 03/15/2012 03:01 PM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
Hi Thomas,
>> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
> It applies on TI-u-boot, but TI-u-boot is still broken for Devkit8000
> (SOFT_ECC).
Yes, I have the same problem, too. The com
Hi,
>> Just to understand, are we now required to
>> introduce #error macro in OMAP4 to get this through ?
>
> No, I just need to post the patches I have that introduce a gcc
> version check prior to building. It's lifted in part from the kernel,
> but our Makefiles are too different for the ke
26 matches
Mail list logo
