On 01/25/12 20:04, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> * Code copied from linux kernel 3.0.0 from file include/linux/i2c/twl.h
>
> Do you need them?
>
> Also, as in other patches, I noticed you don't CC Tom Rini. Also, Ccing Igor
> Grinberg. Please keep the Cc in next inkarnation of the series!
>
> Guys, can
Hi,
>From where I can get the UBOOT code for SPEAr1310 evaluation board. I m
first time working on UBOOT thing. kindly direct me to the appropriate link
where I can download this for SPEAr1310.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Zeeshan Aslam
___
U-Boot mai
The u-boot loader is showing an incorrect size in the memory, and
passing the invalid information to the kernel.
> U-Boot SPL 2011.12-dirty (Jan 25 2012 - 19:07:19)
> Texas Instruments Revision detection unimplemented
> OMAP SD/MMC: 0
> reading u-boot.img
> reading u-boot.bin
> mkimage signature
Hi Stefano,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:27 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> On 20/01/2012 01:53, Joe Hershberger wrote:
>> Link-local support allows the bootloader to get a usable network address
>> regardless of network environment. Given that bootloaders may not always
>> have access to a DHCP server,
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Simon Glass wrote at Wednesday, January 25, 2012 1:14 PM:
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> > Document a binding for the Tegra20 CAR (Clock And Reset) Controller,
>> > add it to tegra20.dtsi, and co
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 22:55:25 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 22:28:38 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 21:55:53 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > > must can reuse? Anyway, that's nonsense, why won't u-boot be able to
> > > > > craft those atags?
> > > >
> On Wednesday 25 January 2012 22:28:17 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 21:51:38 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:12:51 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > > > > * if defined run env "premonitor" before Main Loop for Monitor
> > > > > > > Processing
> > >
> On Wednesday 25 January 2012 22:29:16 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 21:56:37 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:20:01 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > > > So why not just replace the bootloader right away?
> > > > >
> > > > > Booting process on n900:
>
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 22:28:17 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 21:51:38 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:12:51 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > > > * if defined run env "premonitor" before Main Loop for Monitor
> > > > > > Processing
> > > > >
> > >
> On Wednesday 25 January 2012 22:28:38 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 21:55:53 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > must can reuse? Anyway, that's nonsense, why won't u-boot be able to
> > > > craft those atags?
> > >
> > > Maemo 5 (default OS in Nokia N900) cannot work if kernel doe
> 2012/1/25 Marek Vasut :
> >> From: Marek Vasut
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
> >> Signed-off-by: Vasily Khoruzhick
> >> [vasily: adapted Marek's old version for newer u-boot,
> >> fixed multiple keypresses handling]
> >
> > Fine ... albert, can you comment on it?
> >
> > Vas
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 22:29:16 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 21:56:37 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:20:01 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > > So why not just replace the bootloader right away?
> > > >
> > > > Booting process on n900:
> > > > 1. Oma
2012/1/25 Marek Vasut :
>> From: Marek Vasut
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
>> Signed-off-by: Vasily Khoruzhick
>> [vasily: adapted Marek's old version for newer u-boot,
>> fixed multiple keypresses handling]
>
> Fine ... albert, can you comment on it?
>
> Vasily, do you think this co
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> last version of patchset has not received comments since a long time -
> Simon sends to me a confirm that tests on the devkit8000 are successful.
>
> Any chance to get the patchset merged soon or do you have any open points ?
I'v
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 22:28:38 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 21:55:53 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > must can reuse? Anyway, that's nonsense, why won't u-boot be able to
> > > craft those atags?
> >
> > Maemo 5 (default OS in Nokia N900) cannot work if kernel does not have
>
Hello,
The following changes since commit 5d250e52ffd5554834a45ac8d53762fbbf36933c:
Simon Glass (1):
tegra2: Enable data cache
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-ti.git master
Ben Gardiner (1):
arm, davinci: add PLL0 prediv to da850 lowlevel setup
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Yegor Yefremov
wrote:
> Am 18.07.2011 15:51, schrieb Yegor Yefremov:
>> From 53afd3a38abbaed8890ca1ba36439e0c93b69969 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Yegor Yefremov
>> Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:44:42 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] am3517evm: remove rootfstype kernel
> On Wednesday 25 January 2012 21:56:37 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:20:01 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > So why not just replace the bootloader right away?
> > >
> > > Booting process on n900:
> > > 1. Omap bootrom
> > > 2. Nokia X-Loader
> > > 3. Nokia NOLO Bootloader
> >
> On Wednesday 25 January 2012 21:55:53 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > must can reuse? Anyway, that's nonsense, why won't u-boot be able to
> > craft those atags?
>
> Maemo 5 (default OS in Nokia N900) cannot work if kernel does not have
> proper atags from NOLO. So if U-Boot does not reuse it, then Maemo
> On Wednesday 25 January 2012 21:51:38 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:12:51 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > > * if defined run env "premonitor" before Main Loop for Monitor
> > > > > Processing
> > > >
> > > > What is this good for?
> > >
> > > before running monitor loop
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 21:51:38 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:12:51 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > * if defined run env "premonitor" before Main Loop for Monitor
> > > > Processing
> > >
> > > What is this good for?
> >
> > before running monitor loop I'd like write som
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 21:56:37 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:20:01 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > So why not just replace the bootloader right away?
> >
> > Booting process on n900:
> > 1. Omap bootrom
> > 2. Nokia X-Loader
> > 3. Nokia NOLO Bootloader
> > 4. Linux kernel
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 21:55:53 Marek Vasut wrote:
> must can reuse? Anyway, that's nonsense, why won't u-boot be able to craft
> those atags?
>
Maemo 5 (default OS in Nokia N900) cannot work if kernel does not have proper
atags from NOLO. So if U-Boot does not reuse it, then Maemo will not
> From: Marek Vasut
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
> Signed-off-by: Vasily Khoruzhick
> [vasily: adapted Marek's old version for newer u-boot,
> fixed multiple keypresses handling]
Fine ... albert, can you comment on it?
Vasily, do you think this code is good? I want an honest answer
> On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:20:01 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > So why not just replace the bootloader right away?
>
> Booting process on n900:
> 1. Omap bootrom
> 2. Nokia X-Loader
> 3. Nokia NOLO Bootloader
> 4. Linux kernel
> ...
To make it clear, I own N900 myself ;-)
>
> Nokia X-Loader and
> On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:02:45 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > This patch adapts the bootm command so that it can use an existing
> > > atags command set up by a previous bootloader.
> >
> > Why do you need it?
>
> Default Nokia kernel has patches which using non-standard atags for
> reporting
> On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:08:31 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > +static void console_clear(void)
> >
> > Do you use this function AT ALL?
>
> Yes, in patch which add ANSI terminal support to cfb_console.
Why do you even need the support for ANSI terminal in the first place?
> On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:10:03 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Do you seriously need a new command for such a simple operation?
>
> Yes, command clear is really usefull for debugging framebuffer output on
> n900.
Ok, let's see what the other people think, I'm opposed tho
_
> On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:12:29 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > So this is just to interrupt autoboot? Why not just report the "menukey"
> > as any other keypress and do it that way?
>
> Usefull for interrupt autoboot and run some menu (script/booting) only with
> specific key (for example with key
> On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:12:51 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > * if defined run env "premonitor" before Main Loop for Monitor
> > > Processing
> >
> > What is this good for?
>
> before running monitor loop I'd like write some info to console (specific
> board info, board commands, board macro
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:32 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> On 17/01/2012 07:14, Govindraj wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>>> On 16/01/2012 08:58, Govindraj wrote:
>>>
Th v2 patch series [1] posted is based on top of this patch.
>>>
>>> If I understand well, we n
Simon Glass wrote at Wednesday, January 25, 2012 1:14 PM:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > Document a binding for the Tegra20 CAR (Clock And Reset) Controller,
> > add it to tegra20.dtsi, and configure it for the board in tegra-
> > seaboard.dts.
...
> > v2:
...
> > *
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Document a binding for the Tegra20 CAR (Clock And Reset) Controller,
> add it to tegra20.dtsi, and configure it for the board in tegra-
> seaboard.dts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren
> ---
> v2:
> * Remove clock-names, cloc
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:06:51 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > * Use correct buffer size, do not damage screen output
>
> What are the symptoms, how does this fix the issue?
>
> Ccing Anatolij, I think he's the right one for this patch. Again, keep the
> correct CC!!!
>
Output on n900 screen is dam
Signed-off-by: Vasily Khoruzhick
---
v2: mmcinfo is necessary to scan card for partitions
v3: replace mmcinfo with mmc rescan
v4: mmc rescan does not take extra argument in recent u-boot,
so remove it.
v5: remove spaces from CONFIG_BOOTCOMMAND
v6: no change
board/zipitz2/zipitz2.c |8 +
Signed-off-by: Vasily Khoruzhick
---
v2: remove usbtty stuff from EXTRA_ENV_SETTINGS
v3: shift+backspace should produce backspace code
v4: no change
v5: prettify CONFIG_PXA27X_MKP_KEYMAP
v6: no change
include/configs/zipitz2.h | 82 ++---
1 files changed
Document a binding for the Tegra20 CAR (Clock And Reset) Controller,
add it to tegra20.dtsi, and configure it for the board in tegra-
seaboard.dts.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren
---
v2:
* Remove clock-names, clock-output-names properties; Tegra will solely
use integer IDs for clocks in DT.
* Fi
This provides an example of how to use the Tegra CAR clock binding in a
board .dts file.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren
---
I think it makes sense to check the previous patch into the Linux kernel,
since it's mainly just defining what the binding is. However, this patch
is just an example and need
From: Marek Vasut
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
Signed-off-by: Vasily Khoruzhick
[vasily: adapted Marek's old version for newer u-boot,
fixed multiple keypresses handling]
---
v2: use struct-based access to regs, minor cleanup
v3: fix multiple keypresses handling, minor cleanup
v4: anothe
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:18:50 Marek Vasut wrote:
> Do you need this command if you already have common/menu.c?
>
I need menu which can work with ANSI terminal and framebuffer on device
screen. Something which can easy choose booting system...
I can look at menu.c if it can replace my boot
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:12:51 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > * if defined run env "premonitor" before Main Loop for Monitor Processing
>
> What is this good for?
>
before running monitor loop I'd like write some info to console (specific
board info, board commands, board macros). but if these inf
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:12:29 Marek Vasut wrote:
> So this is just to interrupt autoboot? Why not just report the "menukey" as
> any other keypress and do it that way?
>
Usefull for interrupt autoboot and run some menu (script/booting) only with
specific key (for example with key M on devi
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:10:03 Marek Vasut wrote:
> Do you seriously need a new command for such a simple operation?
>
Yes, command clear is really usefull for debugging framebuffer output on n900.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed me
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:08:31 Marek Vasut wrote:
> >
> > +static void console_clear(void)
>
> Do you use this function AT ALL?
>
Yes, in patch which add ANSI terminal support to cfb_console.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:04:37 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > * Code copied from linux kernel 3.0.0 from file include/linux/i2c/twl.h
>
> Do you need them?
>
Yes, needed for twl regulator for enabling eMMC.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed m
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:02:45 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > This patch adapts the bootm command so that it can use an existing atags
> > command set up by a previous bootloader.
>
> Why do you need it?
Default Nokia kernel has patches which using non-standard atags for reporting
bootmode, bootrea
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 10:10:18 Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> Can you also add a config option for the SPI bus number? I think these
> two need to handled in the same patch.
>
> So you could add this stuff:
>
> static int do_spi_flash_probe(int argc, char * const argv[])
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SF
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:20:01 Marek Vasut wrote:
> So why not just replace the bootloader right away?
>
Booting process on n900:
1. Omap bootrom
2. Nokia X-Loader
3. Nokia NOLO Bootloader
4. Linux kernel
...
Nokia X-Loader and NOLO are stored in first nand part. It has size 128kB.
Nokia X
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 01/25/2012 12:19 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> Maybe we should poke to nop out U_BOOT_CMD for
>> CONFIG_SPL_BUILD? OTOH, #ifndef'ing U_BOOT_CMD and the code itself
>> gets us a space savings we wouldn't get otherwise (I suspect giving
>> the MTD/
On 01/25/2012 12:19 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> Maybe we should poke to nop out U_BOOT_CMD for
> CONFIG_SPL_BUILD? OTOH, #ifndef'ing U_BOOT_CMD and the code itself
> gets us a space savings we wouldn't get otherwise (I suspect giving
> the MTD/NAND issue I've mentioned before)...
Commands should be st
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> * Hide function save_boot_params if CONFIG_SPL_BUILD is not defined
>> (function do nothing)
>
> What do you mean by this statement here ?
>>
>> * Same behaviour as in file arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap4/lowlevel_init.S
>
> Eh?
>
>> * This allow to
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> * Hide function save_boot_params if CONFIG_SPL_BUILD is not defined (function
> do nothing)
This is fine.
> * Same behaviour as in file arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap4/lowlevel_init.S
This isn't quite right. OMAP4/5 and AM33XX can re-use the same
> * Code copied from linux kernel 3.0.0 from file include/linux/i2c/twl.h
Do you need them?
Also, as in other patches, I noticed you don't CC Tom Rini. Also, Ccing Igor
Grinberg. Please keep the Cc in next inkarnation of the series!
Guys, can you also help review the rest of the series ?
>
>
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Andreas Müller
wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 11, 2012 04:34:05 PM Tom Rini wrote:
>> I ordered the same card Peter sees failure on and it arrived
>> yesterday. I'm formatting it now and will see if I can duplicate the
>> problem here today.
> ping?
I thought I
> On Wednesday 25 January 2012 04:48:00 Sergey Lapin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 03:27:57PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > This patch series add support for new board Nokia RX-51 (aka N900).
> > > Last two patches adding on screen bootmenu support.
> > >
> > > This series supersedes the las
> * Added some ANSI escape codes definitions in common.h
> * Configuration is done via env variables bootmenu_delay and
> bootmenu_:
>
> bootmenu_delay=
> bootmenu_="="
>
> (title and commands are separated by first char '=')
>
> is delay in seconds of autobooting first entry
> * if defined run env "premonitor" before Main Loop for Monitor Processing
What is this good for?
>
> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
> ---
> Changes since original version:
>- removed #ifdef CONFIG_PREMONITOR in main.c
>
> common/env_common.c |3 +++
> common/main.c |4
> 2
> * If not defined CONFIG_MENUCMD do nothing
>
> * If CONFIG_MENUKEY is 0 and was pressed any key run env "menu_cmd"
> * If pressed key was CONFIG_MENUKEY run env "menu_cmd"
> * If CONFIG_MENUKEY is not defined run env "menu_cmd" always
>
> * CONFIG_MENUKEY working if defined CONFIG_MENUCMD
> * Command can be enabled by CONFIG_CMD_CLEAR
> * Added some ANSI escape codes definitions in common.h
>
> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
> Cc: Marcel Mol
Do you seriously need a new command for such a simple operation?
M
> ---
> Changes since original version:
>- Renamed command clr to clea
> * console_clear - clear full console framebuffer output
> * console_clear_line - clear part of specified line (or full)
>
> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
> ---
> Changes since original version:
>- Fixed commit message
>
> drivers/video/cfb_console.c | 64
>
> * Use correct buffer size, do not damage screen output
What are the symptoms, how does this fix the issue?
Ccing Anatolij, I think he's the right one for this patch. Again, keep the
correct CC!!!
>
> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
> ---
> Changes since original version:
>- Fixed commit mess
> * Ignore ANSI escape codes for moving cursor, which are generated by
> keyboard
I think WD should comment on this one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
> ---
> Changes since original version:
>- Fixed commit message
>
> common/main.c | 51
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:43 AM, Christian Riesch
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Prabhakar Lad
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Christian Riesch <
>> christian.rie...@omicron.at> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Prabhakar Lad
>>> wrote:
> This patch adapts the bootm command so that it can use an existing atags
> command set up by a previous bootloader.
Why do you need it?
> If the environment variable
> "atagaddr" is unset, bootm behaves as normal. If "atagaddr" is set, bootm
> will use atags address from environment variable an
> * Hide function save_boot_params if CONFIG_SPL_BUILD is not defined
> (function do nothing)
What do you mean by this statement here ?
>
> * Same behaviour as in file arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap4/lowlevel_init.S
Eh?
> * This allow to implement board specified function save_boot_params in
> board c
> This patch series add support for new board Nokia RX-51 (aka N900).
> Last two patches adding on screen bootmenu support.
Isn't on-screen bootmenu already supported by common/menu.c stuff ?
>
> This series supersedes the last sent version.
So ... this is V2? What are the changes from previous
> On 01/25/2012 08:43 AM, Peter Meerwald wrote:
> > Hello Tom,
> >
> >>> MLO/SPL + current u-boot breaks the USB ethernet patches (i.e. booting
> >>> via tftp)
> >>
> >> Even with 'dc off' before you start usb?
> >
> > I was not aware of the u-boot command 'dc off' -- yes, it solve my USB
> > et
> Dear Wilson Perez,
>
> In message you wrote:
> > I am currently using u-boot-2009.11 on an Atmel at91sam9g45 and would
> > like to add support for the SMSC9514 to be able to run tcp/ip over usb.
> > The
>
> U-Boot has only a minimal network stack; we can do some UDP, but we
> cannot do TCP/IP
> Hi list,
>
> Someone know what is the last U-boot non-broken version for AT91RM9200-DK
> Board?
Hello,
if it's broken, please fix it and send patch (TM).
> I need the boot from compact flash feature, is that available on that
> version?
No idea, the code is GPL, you have the source.
> I can
> > Robert ... do you really want to cooperate and help fix stuff mainline or
> > do you want to keep everyone in blind, make them guess/help you and when
> > you fix something, never come back and have the fix only for yourself?
>
> Well, given my very verbose thread start, including oscillograph
> Robert ... do you really want to cooperate and help fix stuff mainline or do
> you
> want to keep everyone in blind, make them guess/help you and when you fix
> something, never come back and have the fix only for yourself?
Well, given my very verbose thread start, including oscillographs, it i
On 01/25/2012 08:43 AM, Peter Meerwald wrote:
> Hello Tom,
>
>>> MLO/SPL + current u-boot breaks the USB ethernet patches (i.e. booting via
>>> tftp)
>
>> Even with 'dc off' before you start usb?
>
> I was not aware of the u-boot command 'dc off' -- yes, it solve my USB
> ethernet problem
>
>
> It updates the missing gpio configuration of UART port.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap
> Cc: HeungJun, Kim
> ---
> board/samsung/trats/trats.c |4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/board/samsung/trats/trats.c b/board/samsung/trats/trats.c
> inde
> hi.. i am new to u-boot .
> for my practice my team leader asked me to
> cross compile arm720t modnet50 board with arm-none-linux compiler and now
> asking me to compile the same source code with abacus-anurag-linux compiler
> . will it be useful for me? and i am
> > From your previous email, it looked like that was proper solution. You
> > can still send a patch so we can test and proceed further in sync.
>
> I will send it in, as soon as I have a solution that enables instruction
> stepping through this code.
>
> > What do you mean?
>
> If my 'solution
> From your previous email, it looked like that was proper solution. You can
> still
> send a patch so we can test and proceed further in sync.
I will send it in, as soon as I have a solution that enables instruction
stepping through
this code.
> What do you mean?
If my 'solution' doesn't enab
> Hi Fabio,
>
> > Could you please post a patch with your proposed change so that we can
> > test it?
>
> I was hoping for a suggestion from you, as you know this SoC far better
> than me. Currently I am trying different solutions. Even though they
> prevent the system from hanging up, they still
Hi Fabio,
> Could you please post a patch with your proposed change so that we can test
> it?
I was hoping for a suggestion from you, as you know this SoC far better than me.
Currently I am trying different solutions. Even though they prevent the system
from
hanging up, they still don't enable
In message <1327404627.60813.yahoomail...@web120202.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
> For now i got around this problem with a negative test
> set x
>
> if test $x != 1 then echo "No"; else echo "Yes"; fi
>
> with this if x is not present i get No, even in the case when x is
> present and set any other value
Hello Tom,
> > MLO/SPL + current u-boot breaks the USB ethernet patches (i.e. booting via
> > tftp)
> Even with 'dc off' before you start usb?
I was not aware of the u-boot command 'dc off' -- yes, it solve my USB
ethernet problem
here is my story (from bisecting):
v2011.06 + Koen et al. pat
Hi Robert,
On 1/25/12, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> Shouldn't we configure clkctrl_frac0 - or at least disable CPU clock
>> gating - before disabling PLL bypass?
>
> This seems reasonable. Fabio, can you comment?
Could you please post a patch with your proposed change so that we can test it?
Regards,
On 01/25/2012 03:03 AM, Peter Meerwald wrote:
> Hello Tom,
>
>>> I can boot u-boot built from git commit
>>> b609009801b8a00644926f49b7d0d0cc0d3d8797 successfully, but it fails with
>>> git commit ee08a8260a3a7f6ef2001cfa3e7b6137b485f40a:
>
>> The current implementation (after poking some of the
Hi Eric,
please see my comments below.
On 24.01.2012 17:18, Eric Nelson wrote:
> This patch allows a board configuration file to provide a default
> chip-select for serial flash so that first argument to the 'sf' command
> is optional.
>
> On boards that use the mxc_spi driver and a GPIO for ch
> Hi Marek/Fabio,
>
> I think there's an error in code setting up the CPU clock in the
> SPL for the i.MX28. When instruction stepping through
> mx28_power_clock2pll in spl_power_init.c, the processor drops dead
> right after PLL bypass has been disabled.
Stepping through the code is not recommen
On 24/01/2012 17:23, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> When running Linux on a mx28evk and issuing a 'reboot'command the following
> behaviour is observed:
>
Hi Fabio,
>
> Calling mx28_power_init() prior to mxs_iomux_setup_multiple_pads() fixes the
> problem and
> make U-boot to re-start succesfully.
T
On 24.01.2012 17:23, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> When running Linux on a mx28evk and issuing a 'reboot'command the following
> behaviour is observed:
>
> root@freescale /$ reboot
>
> starting pid 329, tty '': '/etc/rc.d/rcS stop'
Hi Govindraj,
On 01/25/12 11:04, Govindraj wrote:
> Hi Igor,
>
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Igor Grinberg
> wrote:
>> On 01/19/12 10:15, Govindraj wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Igor Grinberg
>>> wrote:
Hi Govindraj,
On 01/17/12 08:10, Govindraj wrote:
>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski
---
board/esd/otc570/otc570.c |8
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/esd/otc570/otc570.c b/board/esd/otc570/otc570.c
index 5dded41..0c12b66 100644
--- a/board/esd/otc570/otc570.c
+++ b/board/esd/otc570/otc570.c
@@ -8
Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski
---
board/esd/meesc/meesc.c |8
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/esd/meesc/meesc.c b/board/esd/meesc/meesc.c
index 4882ffc..9dd4375 100644
--- a/board/esd/meesc/meesc.c
+++ b/board/esd/meesc/meesc.c
@@ -73,20 +73,2
This patch adds support for USB EHCI driver for Armada100 SOCs.
Signed-off-by: Ajay Bhargav
---
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-armada100/armada100.h |1 +
drivers/usb/host/Makefile |1 +
drivers/usb/host/ehci-armada100.c | 62 +++
3 fi
This patch adds USB host controller's UTMI PHY interface driver for
Armada100 SOCs.
Signed-off-by: Ajay Bhargav
---
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-armada100/armada100.h |7 ++
drivers/usb/host/utmi-armada100.c | 87 +++
drivers/usb/host/utmi-armada100.h
This patch adds support for USB commands and USB storage device for
Marvell gplugD
Signed-off-by: Ajay Bhargav
---
include/configs/gplugd.h | 17 +
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/gplugd.h b/include/configs/gplugd.h
index 9813309.
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 04:48:00 Sergey Lapin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 03:27:57PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > This patch series add support for new board Nokia RX-51 (aka N900).
> > Last two patches adding on screen bootmenu support.
> >
> > This series supersedes the last sent versio
Hi Tom,
last version of patchset has not received comments since a long time -
Simon sends to me a confirm that tests on the devkit8000 are successful.
Any chance to get the patchset merged soon or do you have any open points ?
Thanks,
Stefano
--
===
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Prabhakar Lad
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Christian Riesch <
> christian.rie...@omicron.at> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Prabhakar Lad
>> wrote:
>> > *I want to add a command using U_BOOT_CMD in uboot, where SPL_BUILD
On 20/01/2012 01:53, Joe Hershberger wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Joe Hershberger
> Cc: Joe Hershberger
> Cc: Wolfgang Denk
> ---
Hi Joe,
as far as I understand this patch has nothing to do with the main
feature (link-local addressing). Maybe is it worth to remove it from
this patchset and send it
Hi Christian,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Christian Riesch <
christian.rie...@omicron.at> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Prabhakar Lad
> wrote:
> > *I want to add a command using U_BOOT_CMD in uboot, where SPL_BUILD is
> > enabled for example for da850evm in spl frame w
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message
> you
> wrote:
>> *is there a support yet* to be added for printf?
>
> This makes also no sense to me - printf is available in the SPL.
As long as CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT is defined.
Regards, Christian
___
Dear Prabhakar Lad,
In message
you wrote:
>
> *I want to add a command using U_BOOT_CMD in uboot, where SPL_BUILD is
> enabled for example for da850evm in spl frame work how can i do that *
This makes no sense. Commands can only be executed when we have full
U-Boot running (actually even only
On Wednesday, January 11, 2012 04:34:05 PM Tom Rini wrote:
> I ordered the same card Peter sees failure on and it arrived
> yesterday. I'm formatting it now and will see if I can duplicate the
> problem here today.
ping?
Andreas
___
U-Boot mailing list
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
